Sup. Ct. R. D.C. 17
COMMENT TO 2017 AMENDMENTS
This rule is substantially similar to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17, as amended in 2007, but maintains the following local distinctions: 1) subsection (a)(2) includes suits in the name of the District of Columbia for the use or benefit of another; 2) "District of Columbia" is substituted for "state where the court is located" in subsection (b)(3); 3) "District of Columbia's laws" is substituted for "that state's law" in subsection (b)(3)(A); and 4) "in a United States court" is struck from subsection (b)(3)(B) to indicate that a federally appointed receiver can properly sue or be sued in the Superior Court in accordance with 28 U.S.C § 959.
In accordance with the 2007 federal amendments, former Rule 25(d)(2) has been moved to section (d) of this rule.
COMMENT
Identical to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17 except for 4 changes: (1) Revision of the 2nd sentence in section (a) thereof to comprehend statutes authorizing suits by the District of Columbia for the use or benefit of another; (2) substitution of "District of Columbia" for "state in which the district court is held" in section (b); (3) substitution of "District of Columbia" for "such state" in the 1st exception clause of section (b); and (4) deletion of the limiting phrase "in a court of the United States" from the 2nd exception clause in section (b). This last modification was effected so as to insure that the suing or suable capacity of federally appointed receivers, who may sue and be sued in state courts, shall be determined as nearly as possible in conformity with applicable federal law under 28 U.S.C. §§ 754 and 959(a).