Sup. Ct. R. D.C. 14
COMMENT TO 2017 AMENDMENTS
Formerly Rule 12, this rule has been renumbered as Rule 14. The rule has been reorganized to better distinguish between civil and criminal contempt procedures. The process for criminal contempt proceedings has also been modified consistent with the holdings in In re Robertson, 19 A.3d 751 (D.C. 2011) (determining that criminal contempt actions "had to be brought in the name and pursuant to the sovereign power of the United States") and In re Jackson, 51 A.3d 529 (D.C. 2012) (applying In re Robertson in context of show cause).
Finally, while subsection (a)(2)(C) now indicates that a motion for civil contempt may be filed within a reasonable time after the order expires, a motion for civil contempt to force a party to obey a protection order must be filed prior to the expiration of the protection order that the party is seeking to enforce. If the order will expire before the motion for civil contempt is resolved and the party wishes to proceed with the motion for civil contempt, the party must also file a motion to extend the protection order.
COMMENT
Enforcement by contempt is expressly authorized by D.C. Code § 16-1005(f). The party alleged to be in contempt has no right to a jury trial under either the Constitution or the law of the District of Columbia as long as the penalty for such offense is not more than six months. Therefore, contempt proceedings may be heard by a single judge within the Domestic Violence Unit or Family Division, or may be certified to the Criminal Division for proceedings consistent with the above statute and this rule. The penalties prescribed for criminal contempt are set forth in D.C. Code § 16-705.