Any statement made by a respondent to a law enforcement officer pursuant to this subparagraph (e)(2) shall not be admissible for any purpose, except for impeachment, at any proceeding brought against the respondent.
Sup. Ct. R. D.C. 105
COMMENT
Paragraph (a) of this Rule makes it clear that the procedures set forth in the Rule apply to all cases where children are taken into custody. Paragraphs (b) and (c) implement D.C. Code § 16-2311(b). Paragraph (d) provides for notice to the parent, guardian, or custodian by the Director of Social Services or the Director's delegate in addition to the notice by the person taking the respondent into custody required under D.C. Code § 16-2311(a). Paragraph (e) is designed to prevent interviews of a respondent in detention by the police and others, about the offense for which the respondent is in custody without the presence or consent of the respondent's parent, guardian, custodian, or attorney. Subparagraph (e)(2) permits a law enforcement officer to interview a respondent, with the respondent's consent, about an offense committed in or on route to or from the detention facility and with which the respondent has not been charged. Statements obtained pursuant to subparagraph (e)(2) are not admissible, except for impeachment, at any proceeding brought against the respondent. See Harris v. New York, 401 U.S. 222, 91 S. Ct. 643, 28 L. Ed. 2d 1 (1971).