Sup. Ct. R. D.C. 102
COMMENT
Paragraph (c) of this Rule has been amended to clarify and narrow the former prohibition on use of a respondent's and parents' statements at an intake interview. Under former SCR-Juvenile 102(f), there was disagreement about whether statements made by the respondent or the respondent's parent, guardian or custodian to the intake unit or to the Corporation Counsel prior to the filing of a petition could be admitted at any hearing (evidentiary or otherwise) prior to the disposition hearing, or in a criminal proceeding, at any time prior to conviction. Paragraph (c) as revised bars only the admission of the respondent's statements, but not the parent's, at a factfinding hearing or a criminal trial based on the allegations of the juvenile complaint. This amendment permits use of the respondent's and parent's intake interview statements at an initial hearing. There is no statute that precludes use of such statements at the initial hearing, and the additional information provided by the statements will permit a more informed determination at the initial hearing. Paragraph (e) ensures that although the Corporation Counsel will normally conduct an interview with the complainant in a juvenile case at the same time the intake interview is being conducted, no petition will be filed by the Corporation Counsel until the intake unit's recommendation has been considered.