Sup. Ct. R. D.C. 53
COMMENT TO 2018 AMENDMENTS
This rule has been amended consistent with the stylistic changes to the civil rules. Subsection (e)(2)(C) was modified to provide that the court must review, de novo, an objection to a finding of fact.
This rule also applies to parenting coordinators. In Jordan v. Jordan , 14 A.3d 1136, 1152 (D.C. 2011), the District of Columbia Court of Appeals held that "Rule 53 of the Superior Court Rules Governing Domestic Relations Proceedings authorize[s] the trial court both to appoint a parenting coordinator under [ ] exceptional circumstances... and to delegate decision-making authority to the parenting coordinator over day-to-day issues that do not implicate the court's exclusive responsibility to adjudicate the parties' rights to custody and visitation."