Sup. Ct. R. D.C. 13
COMMENT TO 2018 AMENDMENTS
This rule has been amended to closely conform to the civil rule. In conformance with the civil rule, the provision regarding omitted counterclaims has been deleted. Section (e), formerly section (f), was retained from the previous domestic relations rule. The provision for requesting a name change in a pleading does not affect the court's authority to grant an oral request for a name change.
COMMENT
Paragraph (d) provides that when a claim which would otherwise be a compulsory counterclaim either matures or is acquired by a party after serving a responsive pleading but before trial, it must be pleaded. An example of such a claim is one for absolute divorce where the ground of one year separation had not been reached until after the party filed an answer in a suit for legal separation. If, upon motion, the Court determines that litigation of the counterclaim in the instant proceeding would result in substantial prejudice to any party, it may either continue the trial date to allow the parties to prepare to litigate all claims, or it may order the separate trial of the counterclaim. This deviation from SCR-Civil 13 accommodates the unique nature of actions in the Domestic Relations Branch, and furthers the purpose of the rule by promoting complete litigation of all claims between the parties in one action. Paragraph (f) makes it clear that a party need not file a counterclaim for a change of name upon divorce. The request may be included in the party's responsive pleading.