The parties agree under 10 Del. C. § 351 that the Report of the Magistrate in Chancery shall be final and binding and not subject to appeal.
Del. R. Ch. Ct. 144
Comment
In 2024, Rule 144 was revised to align its structure and language with other provisions of the Court of Chancery Rules. In addition, certain revisions were made to the procedures provided for in the rules.
The revision makes the following changes:
Rules 144(a)(1)-(2) clarify that the Chancellor may assign to a Magistrate in Chancery a civil action or a specific dispute within a civil action.
Rule 144(a)(3) clarifies that when an action or dispute is referred to a Magistrate in Chancery, the Court of Chancery Rules, as modified by Rule 144, apply in such proceeding.
Rules 144(b)(1)-(3) clarify the nomenclature used when a Magistrate in Chancery issues rulings.
Rule 144(c)(1)(A) authorizes Magistrates in Chancery to hear and decide exceptions to a Draft Report.
Rule 144(c)(1)(B) prohibits parties from taking exceptions to a Report where that party failed to take timely exceptions to a draft form of that Report.
Rule 144(c)(2)(A) provides that in a civil action other than those on the civil miscellaneous docket, a party may take exceptions only after entry of a Final Report. Rule 144(c)(2)(A) also establishes a deadline for filing such exceptions.
Rule 144(c)(2)(B) provides that in an action on the civil miscellaneous docket, a party may take exceptions to any Report without waiting for a Final Report to be issued.
Rule 144(c)(2)(B) also establishes a deadline for filing such exceptions.
Rule 144(c)(3) codifies the Court's current procedure for reviewing exceptions to a Report to determine whether the exceptions comply with Rule 144.
Rule 144(c)(3)(A) establishes the authority of a Reviewing Judge to order a procedural review of exceptions to a Report by a Magistrate in Chancery.
Rule 144(c)(3)(B) was added to authorize a Magistrate in Chancery to conduct a procedural review and to issue a Report recommending whether the exceptions comply with Rule 144.
Rule 144(c)(3)(C) clarifies that parties may take exceptions to a Magistrate in Chancery's Report addressing procedural review.
Rule 144(c)(3)(D) clarifies that the Reviewing Judge may hear exceptions even if the Magistrate in Chancery has concluded that the exceptions should be dismissed for failure to comply with Rule 144.
Rules 144(d)(1)-(2) provide that, for civil actions other than those on the civil miscellaneous docket, the time for taking exceptions does not begin until after the Magistrate in Chancery has issued a Final Report that concludes a referred action or dispute. Under the prior Rule 144, parties could file exceptions to any non-draft Report in a non-expedited matter within 11 days of entry of the Report and could file exceptions to any non-draft Report in an expedited matter within three days of entry of the Report, unless the exceptions period was stayed. The combined effect of the revisions to Rule 144(b)(2) and Rule 144(d)(1)-(2) is to stay the period for filing exceptions until the matter before the Magistrate in Chancery has concluded, at which point any party may file exceptions to any Report previously issued by the Magistrate in Chancery. If no party timely files exceptions, the Chancellor will adopt the Final Report and all prior Reports as orders of the court.
Rule 144(d)(3) clarifies that parties that fail to file timely opening briefs in support of filed exceptions are deemed to have withdrawn the exceptions.
Rule 144(d)(4) establishes the period for filing exceptions in an action on the civil miscellaneous docket.
Rule 144(e) clarifies that the Reviewing Judge hears exceptions based on the record established before the Magistrate in Chancery and that the Reviewing Judge may permit expansion of the record for good cause.
Rule 144(f) confirms that any party may move for reargument or clarification of a Magistrate in Chancery's Report under Rule 59(f).
Rule 144(g)(1) provides litigants with proposed language to stipulate to a final adjudication of any action or dispute before a Magistrate in Chancery.
Rule 144(g)(2) provides litigants with proposed language to stipulate that the decision of the Magistrate in Chancery shall be final and binding and not subject to appeal.
Otherwise, no substantive change in the interpretation of the rule is intended, and prior Delaware authorities interpreting the rule remain applicable.