(Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2016; previously amended effective January 1, 2014.)
(Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2024; Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2016; previously amended effective January 1, 2014.)
(Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2014.)
(Subd (d) amended effective January 1, 2018; previously amended effective March 1, 2014, and January 1, 2017.)
Notwithstanding any dispute that may arise over the estimated or billed costs of a reporter's transcript, a designating party must timely comply with the requirements under this rule regarding deposits for transcripts. If a designating party believes that a reporter's estimate or bill is excessive, the designating party may file a complaint with the Court Reporters Board.
(Subd (e) adopted effective January 1, 2014.)
(Subd (f) amended effective January 1, 2016; adopted as subd (e); previously relettered as subd (f) effective January 1, 2014; previously amended effective March 1, 2014.)
Cal. R. Ct. 8.834
Advisory Committee Comment
Subdivision (b). Sometimes a party in a trial court proceeding will purchase a reporter's transcript of all or part of the proceedings before any appeal is filed. In recognition of the fact that such transcripts may already have been purchased, this rule allows an appellant, in lieu of depositing funds for a reporter's transcript, to deposit with the trial court a certified transcript of the proceedings necessary for the appeal. Subdivision (b)(2)(D) makes clear that the certified transcript may be filed in lieu of a deposit for a reporter's transcript only where the certified transcript contains all of the proceedings designated, and the transcript complies with the format requirements of rule 8.838 (e.g., cover information, renumbered pages, required indexes). Parties using this alternative to a deposit are responsible for ensuring that such transcripts are in the proper format. Parties may arrange with a court reporter to do the necessary formatting of the transcript or may do the formatting themselves.