L. R. Prac. Sup. Ct. 17
COMMENT TO 2002 AMENDMENT TO RULE 18 [RENUMBERED AS RULE 17 ]
Parties are cautioned that the 2001 amendment to Rule 18 must be read in light of Martinez V. Binsfield, 196Ariz. 466 (2000), which held that Uniform Rule V(e) [now Rule 38.1(d) ] applies to cases assigned to mandatory arbitration, and repeated continuances granted by the arbitrator did not provide good cause for continuing the case on the Inactive Calendar.
HISTORICAL NOTES
The order dated May 31, 2002, provided in part:
"IT IS ORDERED that experimental Rule 18 of the Local Rules of Practice for the Coconino County Superior Court be discontinued and the attachment hereto be inserted in its place as the permanent text of Rule 18, effective December 1, 2002.
Former Rule 17 was renumbered as Rule 16 on Nov. 1, 2007, effective Oct. 22, 2007.