Section NR 466.07 - Standards: product and packaging rotogravure and wide-web flexographic printing(1) COMPLIANCE DATES. Each owner or operator of any product and packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic printing affected source that is subject to the requirements of this chapter shall comply with this section on and after the compliance dates as specified in s. NR 466.08.(2) EMISSION LIMITATIONS. The owner or operator of each product and packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic printing affected source shall limit organic HAP emissions to no more than any one of the following: (a) Five percent of the organic HAP applied for the month.(b) Four percent of the mass of inks, coatings, varnishes, adhesives, primers, solvents, reducers, thinners and other materials applied for the month.(c) Twenty percent of the mass of solids applied for the month.(d) A calculated equivalent allowable mass based on the organic HAP and solids contents of the inks, coatings, varnishes, adhesives, primers, solvents, reducers, thinners and other materials applied for the month.(3) COMPLIANCE METHODS. The owner or operator of each product and packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic printing affected source shall demonstrate compliance with sub. (2) according to one of the following procedures:(a) Demonstrate that each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive, primer, solvent, diluent, reducer, thinner and other material applied during the month contains no more than 0.04 weight-fraction organic HAP, on an as-purchased basis, as determined in accordance with s. NR 466.09(2) (b).(b) Demonstrate that each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive, primer and other solids-containing material applied during the month contains no more than 0.04 weight-fraction organic HAP, on a monthly average as-applied basis, as determined in accordance with the following procedures:1. Determine the organic HAP content of each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive, primer, solvent, diluent, reducer, thinner and other material applied on an as-purchased basis in accordance with s. NR 466.09(2) (b).2. Calculate the monthly average as-applied organic HAP content (Cahi) of each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive, primer and other solids-containing material using Equation 3. See Image
(c) Demonstrate that each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive, primer and other solids-containing material applied, contains no more than one of the following:1. 0.04 weight-fraction organic HAP on a monthly average as-applied basis, when determined in accordance with par. (b).2. 0.20 kg (0.20 lb) of organic HAP per kg (lb) of solids applied, on a monthly average as-applied basis, when determined in accordance with the following procedures: a. Determine the as-applied solids content following the procedure in s. NR 466.09(3) (b) of all materials which do not meet the requirements of subd.1.b. Calculate the monthly average as-applied solids content of materials which are reduced, thinned or diluted prior to application, using Equation 4. See Image
c. Calculate the as-applied organic HAP to solids ratio, Hsi, for all materials which do not meet the requirements of subd. 1., using Equation 5. See Image
(d) Demonstrate that the monthly average as-applied organic HAP content, HL, of all materials applied is less than 0.04 kg (0.04 lb) HAP per kg (lb) of material applied, using Equation 6. See Image
(e) Demonstrate that the monthly average as-applied organic HAP content, HS, is less than 0.20 kg (0.20 lb) HAP per kg (lb) solids applied using Equation 7. See Image
(f) Demonstrate that the total monthly organic HAP applied, H, as determined using Equation 8, is less than the calculated equivalent allowable organic HAP, Ha, as determined under sub. (6). See Image
(g) Operate a capture system and control device and demonstrate an overall organic HAP control efficiency of at least 95% for each month. If the affected source operates more than one capture system or more than one control device, and has only always-controlled work stations, the owner or operator shall demonstrate compliance in accordance with the provisions of sub. (7) or (9). If the affected source operates one or more never-controlled work stations or one or more intermittently-controllable work stations, the owner or operator shall demonstrate compliance in accordance with the provisions of sub. (7). Otherwise, the owner or operator shall demonstrate compliance in accordance with the procedure in sub. (4) when emissions from the affected source are controlled by a solvent recovery device or the procedure in sub. (5) when emissions are controlled by an oxidizer.(h) Operate a capture system and control device and limit the organic HAP emission rate to no more than 0.20 kg (0.20 lb) organic HAP emitted per kg (lb) solids applied as determined on a monthly average as-applied basis. If the affected source operates more than one capture system, more than one control device, one or more never-controlled work stations, or one or more intermittently-controllable work stations, the owner or operator shall demonstrate compliance in accordance with the provisions of sub. (7). Otherwise, the owner or operator shall demonstrate compliance following the procedure in sub. (4) when emissions from the affected source are controlled by a solvent recovery device or the procedure in sub. (5) when emissions are controlled by an oxidizer.(i) Operate a capture system and control device and limit the organic HAP emission rate to no more than 0.04 kg (0.04 lb) organic HAP emitted per kg (lb) material applied as determined on a monthly average as-applied basis. If the affected source operates more than one capture system, more than one control device, one or more never-controlled work stations, or one or more intermittently-controllable work stations, then the owner or operator shall demonstrate compliance in accordance with the provisions of sub. (7). Otherwise, the owner or operator shall demonstrate compliance following the procedure in sub. (4) when emissions from the affected source are controlled by a solvent recovery device or the procedure in sub. (5) when emissions are controlled by an oxidizer.(j) Operate a capture system and control device and limit the monthly organic HAP emissions to less than the allowable emissions as calculated in accordance with sub. (6). If the affected source operates more than one capture system, more than one control device, one or more never-controlled work stations, or one or more intermittently-controllable work stations, the owner or operator shall demonstrate compliance in accordance with the provisions of sub. (7). Otherwise, the owner or operator shall demonstrate compliance following the procedure in sub. (4) when emissions from the affected source are controlled by a solvent recovery device or the procedure in sub. (5) when emissions are controlled by an oxidizer.(4) COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION FOR A SOLVENT RECOVERY DEVICE.(a) To demonstrate the overall organic HAP control efficiency required under sub. (3) (g), or the organic HAP emission limitation requirements in sub. (3) (h) to (j), each owner or operator using a solvent recovery device to control emissions shall do one of the following:1. Perform a liquid-liquid material balance for each month according to the following procedures: a. Measure the mass of each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive, primer, solvent and other material applied on the press or group of presses controlled by a common solvent recovery device during the month.b. If demonstrating compliance with sub. (2) (b), (c) or (d), determine the organic HAP content of each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive, primer, solvent and other material applied during the month following the procedure in s. NR 466.09(2) (b).c. Determine the volatile matter content of each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive, primer, solvent and other material applied during the month following the procedure in s. NR 466.09(3) (b).d. If demonstrating compliance with sub. (2) (c) or (d), determine the solids content of each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive, primer, solvent and other material applied during the month following the procedure in s. NR 466.09(3) (b).e. Install, calibrate, maintain and operate according to the manufacturer's specifications, a device that indicates the cumulative amount of volatile matter recovered by the solvent recovery device on a monthly basis. The device shall be initially certified by the manufacturer to be accurate to within + 2.0%.f. Measure the amount of volatile matter recovered for the month.g. Calculate the volatile matter collection and recovery efficiency, Rv, using Equation 9. See Image
h. If demonstrating compliance with sub. (2) (b), (c) or (d), calculate the organic HAP emitted during the month, H, using Equation 10. See Image
i. If demonstrating compliance with sub. (2) (c), calculate the organic HAP emission rate based on solids applied, L, using Equation 11. See Image
j. If demonstrating compliance with sub. (2) (b), calculate the organic HAP emission rate based on material applied, S, using Equation 12. See Image
2. Conduct continuous emission monitoring of the control device, conduct an initial performance test of capture efficiency, and continuously monitor a site specific operating parameter to assure capture efficiency according to the following procedures: a. If demonstrating compliance with sub. (2) (b), (c) or (d), measure the mass of each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive, primer, solvent and other material applied on the press or group of presses controlled by a common control device during the month.b. If demonstrating compliance with sub. (2) (b), (c) or (d), determine the organic HAP content of each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive, primer, solvent and other material applied during the month following the procedure in s. NR 466.09(2) (b).c. Install continuous emission monitors to determine the total organic volatile matter mass flow rate at both the inlet to and the outlet from the control device, and calculate the percent efficiency (E) of the control device for each month.d. If demonstrating compliance with sub. (2) (c) or (d), determine the solids content of each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive, primer, solvent and other material applied during the month following the procedure in s. NR 466.09(3) (b).e. Install, calibrate, operate and maintain the instrumentation necessary to measure continuously the site-specific operating parameter established in accordance with s. NR 466.10(6) whenever a product and packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic printing press is operated.f. Determine the capture efficiency (F) in accordance with s. NR 466.09(5) and (6).g. Calculate the overall organic HAP control efficiency, (R), achieved for each month using Equation 13. See Image
h. If demonstrating compliance with sub. (2) (b), (c) or (d), calculate the organic HAP emitted during the month, H, for each month using Equation 14. See Image
i. If demonstrating compliance with sub. (2) (c), calculate the organic HAP emission rate based on solids applied, L, using Equation 15. See Image
j. If demonstrating compliance with sub. (2) (b), calculate the organic HAP emission rate based on material applied, S, using Equation 16. See Image
(b)1. Under par. (a) 1., the affected source is in compliance with an emission limitation if one of the following is satisfied:a. The organic volatile matter collection and recovery efficiency, Rv, is 95% or greater.b. The organic HAP emission rate based on solids applied, L, is 0.20 kg (0.20 lb) organic HAP per kg (lb) solids applied or less.c. The organic HAP emission rate based on material applied, S, is 0.04 kg (0.04 lb) organic HAP per kg (lb) material applied or less.d. The organic HAP emitted during the month, H, is less than the calculated allowable organic HAP, Ha, as determined using sub. (6).2. Under par. (a) 2., the affected source is in compliance with an emission limitation if the capture system operating parameter is operated at an average value greater than or less than, as appropriate, the operating parameter value established in accordance with s. NR 466.10(6) for each 3 hour period, and one of the following is satisfied:a. The organic volatile matter collection and recovery efficiency, Rv, is 95% or greater.b. The organic HAP emission rate based on solids applied, L, is 0.20 kg (0.20 lb) organic HAP per kg (lb) solids applied or less.c. The organic HAP emission rate based on material applied, S, is 0.04 kg (0.04 lb) organic HAP per kg (lb) material applied or less.d. The organic HAP emitted during the month, H, is less than the calculated allowable organic HAP, Ha, as determined using sub. (6).(5) COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION FOR AN OXIDIZER. (a) To demonstrate the overall organic HAP control efficiency required under sub. (3) (g) or the organic HAP emission limitation requirements in sub. (3) (h) to (j), each owner or operator using an oxidizer to control emissions shall do one of the following: 1. Conduct initial performance tests of capture efficiency and control device efficiency and continuously monitor capture system and control device operating parameters according to the following procedures: a. Determine the oxidizer destruction efficiency (E) using the procedure in s. NR 466.09(4).b. Determine the capture system capture efficiency (F) in accordance with s. NR 466.09(5) and (6).c. Calculate the overall organic HAP control efficiency, (R), achieved using Equation 13 in sub. (4) (a) 2. g.d. If demonstrating compliance with sub. (2) (b), (c) or (d), measure the mass of each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive, primer, solvent and other material applied on the press or group of presses controlled by a common solvent recovery device during the month.e. If demonstrating compliance with sub. (2) (b), (c) or (d), determine the organic HAP content of each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive, primer, solvent and other material applied during the month following the procedure in s. NR 466.09(2) (b).f. If demonstrating compliance with sub. (2) (c) or (d), determine the solids content of each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive, primer, solvent and other material applied during the month following the procedure in s. NR 466.09(3) (b).g. If demonstrating compliance with sub. (2) (b), (c) or (d), calculate the organic HAP emitted during the month, H, for each month using Equation 14 in sub. (4) (a) 2. h.h. If demonstrating compliance with sub. (2) (c), calculate the organic HAP emission rate based on solids applied, L, for each month using Equation 15 in sub. (4) (a) 2. i.i. If demonstrating compliance with sub. (2) (b), calculate the organic HAP emission rate based on material applied, S, using Equation 16 in sub. (4) (a) 2. j.j. Install, calibrate, operate and maintain the instrumentation necessary to measure continuously the site-specific operating parameters established in accordance with s. NR 466.10(5) and (6) whenever a product and packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic press is operating.2. Conduct continuous emission monitoring of the control device, conduct an initial performance test of capture efficiency, and continuously monitor a site specific operating parameter to assure capture efficiency in accordance with the requirements in sub. (4) (a) 2.(b)1. Under par. (a) 1., the affected source is in compliance with an emission limitation if the oxidizer is operated such that the average operating parameter value is greater than the operating parameter value established in accordance with s. NR 466.10(5) for each 3-hour period, and the capture system operating parameter is operated at an average value greater than or less than, as appropriate, the operating parameter value established in accordance with s. NR 466.10(6) for each 3-hour period, and one of the following is satisfied: a. The overall organic HAP control efficiency, R, is 95% or greater.b. The organic HAP emission rate based on solids applied, L, is 0.20 kg (0.20 lb) organic HAP per kg (lb) solids applied or less.c. The organic HAP emission rate based on material applied, S, is 0.04 kg (0.04 lb) organic HAP per kg (lb) material applied or less.d. The organic HAP emitted during the month, H, is less than the calculated allowable organic HAP, Ha, as determined using sub. (6).2. Under par. (a) 2., the affected source is in compliance with an emission limitation if sub. (4) (b) 2. is satisfied. (6) CALCULATING MONTHLY ALLOWABLE HAP EMISSIONS (HA). Owners or operators shall calculate the monthly allowable HAP emissions, Ha, as required under sub. (3) (f), (4) (b) 1. d. or 2. d., or (5) (b) 1. d., according to the following procedures: (a) Determine the as-purchased mass of each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive, primer and other solids-containing material applied each month, Mi.(b) Determine the as-purchased solids content of each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive, primer and other solids-containing material applied each month, in accordance with s. NR 466.09(3) (b), Csi.(c) Determine the as-purchased mass fraction of each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive, primer and other solids-containing material which was applied at 20% by weight or greater solids content, on an as-applied basis, Gi.(d) Determine the total mass of each solvent, diluent, thinner or reducer added to materials which were applied at less than 20% by weight solids content, on an as-applied basis, each month, MLj.(e) Calculate the monthly allowable HAP emissions, Ha, using Equation 17. See Image
(7) OPERATING MORE THAN ONE CAPTURE SYSTEM OR CONTROL DEVICE, OR ONE OR MORE NEVER-CONTROLLED OR INTERMITTENTLY-CONTROLLABLE WORK STATIONS. This subsection applies to owners or operators of product and packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic printing presses operating more than one capture system, more than one control device, one or more never-controlled work stations, or one or more intermittently-controllable work stations.(a) The owner or operator of each solvent recovery system used to control one or more product and packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic presses for which the owner or operator chooses to perform a liquid-liquid material balance under sub. (4) (a) 1. shall determine the organic HAP emissions for those presses controlled by that solvent recovery system according to one of the following: 1. In accordance with sub. (4) (a) 1. a. to c. and e. to h., if the presses controlled by that solvent recovery system have only always-controlled work stations. 2. In accordance with subs. (4) (a) 1. b., c., e. and f. and (8), if the presses controlled by that solvent recovery system have one or more never-controlled or intermittently-controllable work stations.(b) The owner or operator of each solvent recovery system used to control one or more product and packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic presses, for which the owner or operator chooses to conduct continuous emission monitoring of the control device, conduct an initial test of capture efficiency, and continuously monitor a site specific operating parameter to assure capture efficiency under sub. (4) (a) 2., shall do both of the following:1. For each capture system delivering emissions to that solvent recovery system, monitor an operating parameter established in accordance with s. NR 466.10(6) to assure capture system efficiency.2. Determine the organic HAP emissions for those presses served by each capture system delivering emissions to that solvent recovery system according to one of the following: a. In accordance with sub. (4) (a) 2. a. to c. and e. to h., if the presses served by that capture system have only always-controlled work stations.b. In accordance with subs. (4) (a) 2. b., c. and e. to g. and (8), if the presses served by that capture system have one or more never-controlled or intermittently-controllable work stations.(c) The owner or operator of each oxidizer used to control emissions from one or more product and packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic presses, for which the owner or operator chooses to conduct performance tests of capture efficiency and control device efficiency and continuously monitor capture system and control device operating parameters under sub. (5) (a) 1., shall do all of the following: 1. Monitor an operating parameter established in accordance with s. NR 466.10(5) to assure control device efficiency.2. For each capture system delivering emissions to that oxidizer, monitor an operating parameter established in accordance with s. NR 466.10(6) to assure capture efficiency.3. Determine the organic HAP emissions for those presses served by each capture system delivering emissions to that oxidizer according to one of the following: a. In accordance with sub. (5) (a) 1. a. to e. and g., if the presses served by that capture system have only always-controlled work stations.b. In accordance with subs. (5) (a) 1. a. to c. and e. and (8), if the presses served by that capture system have one or more never-controlled or intermittently-controllable work stations. (d) The owner or operator of each oxidizer used to control emissions from one or more product and packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic presses, for which the owner or operator chooses to conduct continuous emission monitoring of the control device, conduct an initial performance test of capture efficiency and continuously monitor a site specific operating parameter to assure capture efficiency under sub. (5) (a) 2., shall do both of the following: 1. For each capture system delivering emissions to that oxidizer, monitor an operating parameter established in accordance with s. NR 466.10(6) to assure capture efficiency.2. Determine the organic HAP emissions for those presses served by each capture system delivering emissions to that oxidizer according to one of the following: a. In accordance with sub. (4) (a) 2. a. to c. and e. to h., if the presses served by that capture system have only always-controlled work stations.b. In accordance with subs. (4) (a) 2. b., c., e. to g. and (8), if the presses served by that capture system have one or more never-controlled or intermittently-controllable work stations.(e) The owner or operator of one or more uncontrolled product and packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic printing presses shall determine the organic HAP applied on those presses using Equation 8 in sub. (3) (f). For the purpose of a determination under this paragraph, the organic HAP emitted from an uncontrolled press shall be considered equal to the organic HAP applied on that press.(f) If demonstrating compliance with sub. (2) (c) or (d), the owner or operator shall determine the solids content of each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive, primer, solvent and other material applied during the month following the procedure in s. NR 466.09(3) (b).(g) The owner or operator shall determine the organic HAP emissions for the affected source for the month by summing all organic HAP emissions calculated according to pars. (a), (b) 2., (c) 3., (d) 2. and (e). (h) Under this subsection, the affected source is in compliance for the month with an emission limitation, if all operating parameters required to be monitored under pars. (b) to (d), were maintained at the appropriate values, and one of the following is satisfied: 1. The total mass of organic HAP emitted by the affected source was not more than 4% of the total mass of inks, coatings, varnishes, adhesives, primers, solvents, diluents, reducers, thinners and other materials applied by the affected source.2. The total mass of organic HAP emitted by the affected source was not more than 20% of the total mass of solids applied by the affected source.3. The total mass of organic HAP emitted by the affected source was not more than the equivalent allowable organic HAP emissions for the affected source, Ha, calculated in accordance with sub. (6).4. The total mass of organic HAP emitted by the affected source was not more than 5% of the total mass of organic HAP applied by the affected source. The total mass of organic HAP applied by the affected source in the month shall be determined by the owner or operator using Equation 8 in sub. (3) (f).(8) OPERATING NEVER-CONTROLLED OR INTERMITTENTLY CONTROLLABLE WORK STATIONS. Owners or operators determining organic HAP emissions from a press or group of presses having one or more never-controlled or intermittently-controllable work stations and using the procedures specified in sub. (7) (a) 2., (b) 2. b., (c) 3. b. or (d) 2. b., shall do the following for that press or group of presses: (a) Determine the sum of the mass of all inks, coatings, varnishes, adhesives, primers and other solids-containing materials which are applied on intermittently-controllable work stations in bypass mode and the mass of all inks, coatings, varnishes, adhesives, primers and other solids-containing materials which are applied on never-controlled work stations during the month, MBi.(b) Determine the sum of the mass of all solvents, reducers, thinners and other diluents which are applied on intermittently-controllable work stations in bypass mode and the mass of all solvents, reducers, thinners and other diluents which are applied on never-controlled work stations during the month, MBj.(c) Determine the sum of the mass of all inks, coatings, varnishes, adhesives, primers and other solids-containing materials which are applied on intermittently-controllable work stations in controlled mode and the mass of all inks, coatings, varnishes, adhesives, primers and other solids-containing materials which are applied on always-controlled work stations during the month, Mci.(d) Determine the sum of the mass of all solvents, reducers, thinners and other diluents which are applied on intermittently-controllable work stations in controlled mode and the mass of all solvents, reducers, thinners and other diluents which are applied on always-controlled work stations during the month, MCj.(e) For each press or group of presses for which the owner or operator uses the provisions of sub. (7) (a) 2., calculate the organic HAP emitted during the month using Equation 18. See Image
(f) For each press or group of presses for which the owner or operator uses the provisions of sub. (7) (b) 2. b., (c) 3. b. or (d) 2. b., the owner or operator shall calculate the organic HAP emitted during the month using Equation 19. See Image
(9) OPERATING MORE THAN ONE CAPTURE SYSTEM OR CONTROL DEVICE AND NO NEVER-CONTROLLED AND NO INTERMITTENTLY CONTROLLABLE WORK STATIONS. If the owner or operator of an affected source operates more than one capture system or more than one control device, and has no never-controlled work stations and no intermittently-controllable work stations, the affected source is in compliance with the 95% overall organic HAP control efficiency requirement for the month if for each press or group of presses controlled by a common control device one of the following is satisfied: (a) The organic volatile matter collection and recovery efficiency, Rv, as determined by sub. (4) (a) 1. a., c. and e. to g., is equal to or greater than 95%.(b) The overall organic HAP control efficiency as determined by sub. (4) (a) 2. c. and e. to g., for each press or group of presses served by that control device and a common capture system, is equal to or greater than 95% and the average capture system operating parameter value for each capture system serving that control device is greater than or less than, as appropriate, the operating parameter value established for that capture system in accordance with s. NR 466.10(6) for each 3-hour period.(c) The overall organic HAP control efficiency as determined by sub. (5) (a) 1. a. to c. and j., for each press or group of presses served by that control device and a common capture system, is equal to or greater than 95%, the oxidizer is operated such that the average operating parameter value is greater than the operating parameter value established in accordance with s. NR 466.10(5) for each 3-hour period, and the average capture system operating parameter value for each capture system serving that control device is greater than or less than, as appropriate, the operating parameter value established for that capture system in accordance with s. NR 466.10(6) for each 3-hour period. Wis. Admin. Code Department of Natural Resources NR 466.07
Cr. Register, March, 2000, No. 531, eff. 4-1-00.