W. Va. Code R. § 77-8-14

Current through Register Vol. XLI, No. 50, December 13, 2024
Section 77-8-14 - Dismissals and Decisions
14.1. Dismissal.
14.1.1. Election of judicial determination

If the complainant, the respondent, or the aggrieved person on whose behalf a complaint was filed makes a timely election to have the claims asserted in the charge decided in a civil action under W. Va. Code '5-11A-13(o), the administrative law judge shall dismiss the administrative proceeding.

14.1.2. Effect of a civil action on administrative proceeding.

An administrative law judge may not continue an administrative proceeding under this part regarding an alleged discriminatory housing practice after the beginning of the trial of a civil action commenced by the aggrieved person under-state or federal law seeking relief with respect to that discriminatory housing practice. If such a trial is commenced, the administrative law judge shall dismiss the administrative proceeding. The commencement and maintenance of a civil action for appropriate temporary or preliminary relief under W. Va. Code '5-11A-13(j), or proceedings for such relief under W. Va. Code '5-11A-14 does not affect administrative proceedings under these regulations.

14.2. Initial decision of administrative law judge.
14.2.1. In general.

Within the time period set forth in section 14.2.4, the administrative law judge shall issue an initial decision including findings of fact and conclusions of law upon each material issue of fact or law presented on the record. The initial decision of the administrative law judge shall be based on the record of the proceeding.

14.2.2. Finding against respondent.

If the administrative law judge finds that a respondent has engaged, or is about to engage, in a discriminatory housing practice, the administrative law judge shall issue an initial decision against the respondent and order such relief as may be appropriate. The relief may include, but is not limited to, the following:

14.2.2.a. The administrative law judge may order the respondent to pay damages to the aggrieved person, including damages caused by humiliation and embarrassment. Special damages shall be subject to prejudgment interest. Pursuant to the holding in Bishop Coal Co. v. Salyers, 380 S.E.2d 238 (W. Va. 1989), there shall be a cap on damages awarded for humiliation and embarrassment. With regard to each unlawful discriminatory practice committed by each respondent against each aggrieved person, damages for humiliation and embarrassment may not be in excess of this cap. The cap shall be in an amount to be periodically established by the commission, which amount shall be based upon a figure of two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,50O), adjusted in accordance with the Consumer Price Index since 1989.
14.2.2.b. The administrative law judge may provide for injunctive or such other equitable relief as may be appropriate. No such order may affect any contract, sale, encumbrance or lease consummated before the issuance of the initial decision that involved a bona fide purchaser, encumbrancer or tenant without actual knowledge of the charge.
14.2.2.c. To vindicate the public interest, the administrative law judge may assess a civil penalty against the respondent.
14.2.2.c.1. The amount of the civil penalty may not exceed:
(A) Ten thousand dollars ($10,000), if the respondent has not been adjudged to have committed any prior discriminatory housing practice in any administrative hearing or civil action permitted under the West Virginia Fair Housing Act or any state, federal or local fair housing law, or in any licensing or regulatory proceeding conducted by a Federal, State or local governmental agency.
(B) Twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000), if the respondent has been adjudged to have committed one other discriminatory housing practice in any administrative hearing or civil action permitted under the West Virginia Fair Housing Act, or any state, federal or local fair housing law, or in any licensing or regulatory proceeding conducted by a federal, state, or local government agency, and the adjudication was made during the five year period preceding the date of filing of the charge.
(C) Fifty thousand dollars ($50,000), if the respondent has been adjudged to have committed two or more discriminatory housing practices in any administrative hearings or civil actions permitted under the West Virginia Fair Housing Act or any state, federal or local fair housing law, or in any licensing or regulatory proceeding conducted by a federal, state, or local government agency, and the adjudications were made during the seven-year period preceding the date of the filing of the charge.
14.2.2.c.2. If the acts constituting the discriminatory housing practice that is the subject of the charge were committed by the same natural person who has previously been adjudged, in any administrative proceeding or civil action, to have committed acts constituting a discriminatory housing practice, the time periods set forth in section 14.2.2.c.1.(B) and (C) do not apply.
14.2.2.c.3. In a proceeding involving two or more respondents, the administrative law judge may assess a civil penalty as provided under section 14.2.2.c against each respondent that the administrative law judge determines has been engaged or is about to engage in a discriminatory housing practice.
14.2.3. Finding in favor of respondent.

If the administrative law judge finds that a respondent has not engaged, and is not about to engage, in a discriminatory housing practice, the administrative law judge shall make an initial decision dismissing the charge.

14.2.4. Date of issuance.

The administrative law judge shall issue an initial decision within sixty (60) days after the end of the hearing, unless it is impracticable to do so. If the administrative law judge is unable to issue the initial decision within this time period (or within any succeeding sixty-day (60) period following the initial sixty day (60) period), the administrative law judge shall notify in writing all parties, the aggrieved person on whose behalf the charge was filed, and the deputy attorney general of the civil rights division, of the reasons for the delay. In no event shall the initial decision be issued more than twenty-five (25) or less than ten (10) days before the next regularly scheduled meeting of the commissioners.

14.3. Service of initial decision.

Simultaneously with the issuance of the initial decision, the administrative law judge shall serve the initial decision on all parties, the aggrieved person on whose behalf the charge was filed, the attorney general, the executive director of the West Virginia Human Rights Commission, and upon each duly appointed commissioner of the West Virginia Human Rights Commission. The initial decision will include a notice stating that the initial decision will become the final decision of the commission unless the commission issues a final decision under 14.6. within thirty (30) days of the date of issuance of the initial decision.

14.4. Resolution of charge.

At any time before the issuance of a final decision under 14.6., the parties may submit an agreement resolving the charge. The agreement must be signed by the deputy attorney general for civil rights or his/her designee, the respondent, and the aggrieved person upon whose behalf the charge was issued. The administrative law judge shall accept the agreement by issuing an initial decision based on the agreed findings. The submission of an agreement resolving the charge constitutes a waiver of any right to challenge or contest the validity of a decision entered in accordance with the agreement.

14.5. Appeals to the West Virginia Human Rights Commission.
14.5.1. Any party aggrieved by the initial decision of the administrative law judge may petition the commissioners for review of said decision, provided that the original and nine copies of a petition for review must be filed with the commission no later than five (5) days after the issuance of an initial decision.
14.5.2. A petition for review shall concisely describe any alleged error in the initial decision and state the grounds for the reversal or modification of the initial decision.
14.6. Final decision.
14.6.1. Issuance of final decision by the commission.

The commissioners of the West Virginia Human Rights Commission may review any finding of fact, conclusion of law, or order contained in the initial decision of the administrative law judge and issue a final decision in the proceeding. The commissioners may affirm, modify or set aside, in whole or in part, the initial decision or remand the initial decision for further proceedings. The commission shall serve the final decision on all parties no later than thirty (30) days from the date of issuance of the initial decision of the administrative law judge. The final decision shall be served on all parties, the aggrieved person on whose behalf the charge was filed and the attorney general.

14.6.2. No final decision by the commission.

If the commission does not serve a final decision within the time period described above, the initial decision of the administrative law judge will become the final decision of the commission. For the purposes of this part, such a final decision will be considered to have been issued thirty (30) days following the date of issuance of the initial decision.

14.6.3. Public disclosure.

The commission shall make public disclosure of each final decision.

14.6.4. Decisions on remand.

If the commission remands the decision for further proceedings, the administrative law judge shall issue an initial decision on remand within sixty (60) days of the date of issuance of the commission's decision, unless it is impractical to do so. If the administrative law judge is unable to issue the initial decision within this time period (or within any succeeding sixty-day (60) period following the initial sixty-day (60) period), the administrative law judge shall notify in writing the parties, the aggrieved person on whose behalf the charge was filed, and the executive director, of the reasons for the delay.

14.7. Action upon issuance of a final decision.
14.7.1. Licensed or regulated businesses.
14.7.1.a. If a final decision includes a finding that a respondent has engaged or is about to engage in a discriminatory housing practice in the course of a business that is subject to licensing or regulation by a federal, state or local governmental agency the executive director will notify the governmental agency of the decision by:
14.7.1.a.1. Sending copies of the findings of fact, conclusions of law and the final decision to the governmental agency by certified mail; and
14.7.1.a.2. Recommending appropriate disciplinary action to the governmental agency, including, where appropriate, the suspension or revocation of the license of the respondent.
14.7.1.b. The executive director will notify the appropriate governmental agencies within thirty (30) days after the date of issuance of the final decision, unless a petition for judicial review of the final decision as described in 15.1 has been filed before the issuance of the notification of the agency. If such a petition has been filed, the executive director will provide the notification to the governmental agency within thirty (30) days of the date that the final decision is affirmed upon review. If a petition for judicial review is timely filed following the notification of the governmental agency, the executive director will promptly notify the governmental agency of the petition and withdraw his or her recommendation.
14.7.2. Notification to the attorney general.

If a final decision includes a finding that a respondent has engaged or is about to engage in a discriminatory housing practice and another final decision including such a finding was issued under this part within the five (5) years preceding the date of issuance of the final decision, the executive director will notify the attorney general of the decisions by sending a copy of the final decisions in each administrative proceeding.

14.8. Attorney fees and costs.

Following the issuance of the final decision under 14.6. finding that one or more respondents has engaged in an unlawful practice under the West Virginia Fair Housing Act, a prevailing complainant, aggrieved party or intervenor may apply for attorney's fees and costs. The administrative law judge will issue an initial decision awarding or denying such fees and costs. The initial decision will become the final decision of the commission unless the commission reviews the initial decision and issues a final decision on fees and costs within thirty (30) days. The recovery of reasonable attorney's fees and costs will be permitted as follows:

14.8.1. The respondent will be liable for the reasonable attorney fees of an aggrieved person for the services of such person's private counsel.
14.8.2. Where the case on behalf of the aggrieved person has been presented at hearing by the attorney general, the respondent will be liable for the reasonable attorney fees of the attorney general incurred in the preparation and presentation of the aggrieved person's case.
14.8.3. To the extent that an intervenor is a prevailing party, the respondent will be liable for reasonable attorney's fees unless special circumstances make the recovery of such fees and costs unjust.

W. Va. Code R. § 77-8-14