1-2 Violation is of an administrative nature resulting in no harm or danger to the environment or public; or the standard is violated to such a minor degree that environmental harm or public danger will not result.
3-4 Violation results in potential or actual harm or danger remaining in the permit area; or in the case where the impact extends beyond the permit area; can be demonstrated that potential danger or harm or will not result.
5-6 Violation extends beyond the permit area and results in a minor degree of potential or actual harm or impact on the public.
7-8 Violation can reasonably be expected to result in an imminent and substantial harm to the environment public safety or public health. A violation which initially has a seriousness rating of seven (7) or higher is one which must be a cessation order, as set forth in subdivision 16.5 of this rule.
9-10 Violation extends beyond the permit area and results in a significant degree of environmental harm or danger to the public.
Rating | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Dollar Amount | - | 100 | 200 | 400 | 600 | 900 |
Rating | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
Dollar Amount | 1200 | 1600 | 2100 | 2700 | 3500 |
0 This violation is considered beyond the control of the operator or his employees, and no negligence can be attributed to this violation.
1-2 This violation was a result of an oversight on the part of the operator, and may have been avoided if more conscientious effort and/or reasonable care were given.
3-4 This violation was obvious, and/or no action was taken by the operator to prevent the problem.
5-6 The operator failed to adequately respond to previous written instructions of the inspector to prevent this event.
7-8 The operator had been officially notified, in writing, of this problem, and did not make any effort at correcting the problem.
Rating | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
Dollar Amount | 0 | 100 | 225 | 350 | 475 |
Rating | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
Dollar Amount | 600 | 725 | 875 | 1000 |
Good faith percentage shall not include a history of non-compliances in the amount. Good faith percentage shall be rounded to the nearest dollar amount.
0 Operator failed to take appropriate remedial action. Notice of non-compliance has been modified to a cessation order.
1-2 Operator took prompt, but insufficient remedial action to fully abate the violation within the required abatement period. Abatement period was extended for just cause. Remedial action was completed prior to the end of the extended abatement period.
3-4 Operator took prompt remedial action and worked diligently to abate the violation. Conditions beyond the operator's control prevented full abatement, and required that the abatement period be extended for just cause. Abatement of the violation was accomplished before the end of the extended abatement period.
5-6 Operator initiated remedial action immediately and expended all reasonable efforts to abate the violation. Violation was abated before the end of the original abatement period.
7-8 Operator was already taking remedial action at the time the violation was noted, and expended exemplary effort in abating the violation before the end of the original abatement period.
Rating | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
% | 0% | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% |
Rating | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
% | 25% | 30% | 35% | 40% |
Seriousness of Violations $_________
Operator Negligence + $_________
Subtotal $_________
Less Good Faith % - $_________
Sub Total $_________
History of Violations + $_________
Total $_________
W. Va. Code R. § 38-3-16