This rule is adopted in accordance with RCW 34.05.482 through 34.05.494. Brief adjudicative proceedings shall be used, unless provided otherwise by another rule or determined otherwise in a particular case by the president, or a designee, in regard to:
(2) Outstanding debts owed by students or employees.(3) Use of college facilities.(4) Residency determinations.(5) Use of library - Fines.(6) Challenges to contents of education records.(7) Loss of eligibility for participation in institution sponsored athletic events.(8) Student conduct appeals involving the following disciplinary actions: (a) Suspensions of ten instructional days or less;(b) Disciplinary probation;(d) Any conditions or terms imposed in conjunction with one of the foregoing disciplinary actions; and(e) Appeals by a complainant in student disciplinary proceedings involving allegations of sexual misconduct in which the student conduct officer:(i) Dismisses disciplinary proceedings based upon a finding that the allegations of sexual misconduct have no merit; or(ii) Issues a verbal warning to respondent.(9) Appeals of decisions regarding mandatory tuition and fee waivers. Brief adjudicative proceedings are informal hearings and shall be conducted in a manner, which will bring about a prompt fair resolution of the matter.
1 Subsections (1) through (7) and (9) of this section are the types of issues that colleges typically use a brief adjudicative proceeding to resolve and are included here merely for illustrative purposes.
Wash. Admin. Code § 132A-125-050
Adopted by WSR 14-15-008, Filed 7/2/2014, effective 8/2/2014