Section 3.3507 - Rules for COB and Order of Benefits(a) Coverage by two or more plans. When a person is covered by two or more plans, the rules for determining the order of benefit payments will be determined as provided in paragraphs (1) - (5) of this subsection. (1) The primary plan must pay or provide its benefits as if the secondary plan or plans did not exist.(2) A plan may take into consideration the benefits paid or provided by another plan only when, under this subchapter, it is secondary to that other plan.(3) If the primary plan is a closed panel plan and the secondary plan is not, the secondary plan must pay or provide benefits as if it were the primary plan when a covered person uses a noncontracted health care provider or physician, except for emergency services or authorized referrals that are paid or provided by the primary plan.(4) When multiple contracts providing coordinated coverage are treated as a single plan under this subchapter, this section applies only to the plan as a whole, and coordination among the component contracts is governed by the terms of the contracts. If more than one carrier pays or provides benefits under the plan, the carrier designated as primary within the plan must be responsible for the plan's compliance with this subchapter.(5) If a person is covered by more than one secondary plan, the order of benefit determination rules of this subchapter decide the order in which secondary plans' benefits are determined in relation to each other. Each secondary plan must take into consideration the benefits of the primary plan or plans and the benefits of any other plan, that, under the rules of this subchapter, has its benefits determined before those of that secondary plan.(b) Exception. Except as provided by subsection (c) of this section and § 3.3509(b) of this title (relating to Miscellaneous Provisions), a plan that does not contain order of benefit determination provisions that are consistent with this subchapter is always the primary plan unless the provisions of both plans state that the complying plan is primary.(c) Coverage by membership in a group. Coverage that is obtained by virtue of membership in a group and designed to supplement a part of a basic package of benefits may provide that the supplementary coverage must be excess to any other parts of the plan provided by the contract holder. Examples of these types of situations are major medical coverages that are superimposed over base plan hospital and surgical benefits, and insurance-type coverages that are written in connection with a closed panel plan to provide out-of-network benefits.(d) Order of benefit determination. Each plan determines its order of benefits using the first of the following rules that apply.(1) Nondependent or dependent. (A) Subject to this subparagraph and subparagraph (B) of this paragraph, the plan that covers the person other than as a dependent, for example, as an employee, member, subscriber, policyholder, certificate holder, or retiree, is the primary plan, and the plan that covers the person as a dependent is the secondary plan.(B) If the person is a Medicare beneficiary, subparagraph (C) of this paragraph applies if, and as a result of the provisions of Title XVIII of the Social Security Act and implementing regulations, Medicare is:(i) secondary to the plan covering the person as a dependent; and(ii) primary to the plan covering the person as other than a dependent, for example, a retired employee.(C) Under subparagraph (B) of this paragraph, as applicable, the order of benefits is reversed so that the plan covering the person as an employee, member, subscriber, policyholder, certificate holder, or retiree is the secondary plan and the other plan covering the person as a dependent is the primary plan.(2) Dependent child covered under more than one plan. Unless there is a court order stating otherwise, plans covering a dependent child must determine the order of benefits using the following rules that apply.(A) For a dependent child whose parents are married or are living together, whether or not they have ever been married:(i) the plan of the parent whose birthday falls earlier in the calendar year is the primary plan; or(ii) if both parents have the same birthday, the plan that has covered the parent longest is the primary plan.(B) For a dependent child whose parents are divorced or are not living together, whether or not they have ever been married:(i) if a court order states that one of the parents is responsible for the dependent child's health care expenses or health care coverage, and the plan of that parent has actual knowledge of those terms, that plan is primary. If the parent with responsibility has no health care coverage for the dependent child's health care expenses, and that parent's spouse does, then the spouse's plan is the primary plan. This clause must not apply with respect to any plan year during which benefits are paid or provided before the entity has actual knowledge of the court order provision.(ii) if a court order states that both parents are responsible for the dependent child's health care expenses or health care coverage, the provisions of subparagraph (A) of this paragraph must determine the order of benefits.(iii) if a court order states that the parents have joint custody without specifying that one parent has responsibility for the health care expenses or health care coverage of the dependent child, the provisions of subparagraph (A) of this paragraph must determine the order of benefits.(iv) if there is no court order allocating responsibility for the child's health care expenses or health care coverage, the order of benefits for the child is as follows: (I) the plan covering the custodial parent;(II) the plan covering the custodial parent's spouse;(III) the plan covering the noncustodial parent; then(IV) the plan covering the noncustodial parent's spouse.(C) For a dependent child covered under more than one plan of individuals who are not the parents of the child, the order of benefits must be determined, as applicable, under subparagraph (A) or (B) of this paragraph as if the individuals were parents of the child.(D) For a dependent child who has coverage under either or both parents' plans and has his or her own coverage as a dependent under a spouse's plan, subsection (e) of this section applies.(E) In the event the dependent child's coverage under the spouse's plan began on the same date as the dependent child's coverage under either or both parents' plans, the order of benefits must be determined by applying the birthday rule in subparagraph (A) of this paragraph to the dependent child's parent(s) and the dependent's spouse.(3) Active employee, retired, or laid-off employee.(A) The plan that covers a person as an active employee who is neither laid off nor retired, or as a dependent of an active employee, is the primary plan. The plan that covers that same person as a retired or laid-off employee or as a dependent of a retired or laid-off employee is the secondary plan.(B) If the plan that covers the same person as a retired or laid-off employee or as a dependent of a retired or laid-off employee does not conform to the requirements of subparagraph (A) of this paragraph, and as a result, the plans do not agree on the order of benefits, this paragraph does not apply.(C) This paragraph does not apply if paragraph (1) of this subsection can determine the order of benefits.(4) COBRA or state continuation coverage. (A) If a person whose coverage is provided under COBRA or under a right of continuation under state or other federal law is covered under another plan, the plan covering the person as an employee, member, subscriber, or retiree or covering the person as a dependent of an employee, member, subscriber, or retiree is the primary plan, and the plan covering that same person under COBRA or under a right of continuation under state or other federal law is the secondary plan.(B) If the plan that covers the same person under COBRA or under a right of continuation does not conform to the requirements of subparagraph (A) of this paragraph, and as a result, the plans do not agree on the order of benefits, this paragraph does not apply.(C) This paragraph does not apply if paragraph (1) of this subsection can determine the order of benefits.(e) Length of time. If subsection (d) of this section does not determine the order of benefits, the plan that has covered the person for the longer period of time is the primary plan. The plan that has covered the person for the shorter period of time is the secondary plan.(1) To determine the length of time a person has been covered under a plan, two successive plans must be treated as one if the covered person was eligible under the second plan within 24 hours after the first plan ended.(2) The start of a new plan does not include: (A) a change in the amount or scope of a plan's benefits;(B) a change in the entity that pays, provides, or administers the plan's benefits; or(C) a change from one type of plan to another, such as, from a single employer plan to a multiple employer plan.(3) The person's length of time covered under a plan is measured from the person's first date of coverage under that plan. If that date is not readily available for a group plan, the date the person first became a member of the group must be used as the date from which to determine the length of time the claimant's coverage under the present plan has been in force.(f) Sharing equally between the plans. If subsections (a) - (e) of this section do not determine the order of benefits, the allowable expenses must be shared equally between the plans.28 Tex. Admin. Code § 3.3507
The provisions of this §3.3507 adopted to be effective March 25, 2014, 39 TexReg 2086