An intergovernmental child support case is, in general, one in which the noncustodial parent and custodial parent do not live in the same State or foreign country.
Both Initiating State and Responding State cases are commonly referred to as UIFSA ( 45 C.F.R. Part 307, Uniform Intergovernmental Family Support Act) cases. Federal law requires all States and foreign countries who have signed on to The Hague Treaty, to provide child support services to all families that have applied for such services, including location, parentage establishment, and establishment of support obligations, regardless of where the non-custodial parent resides. Federal law also requires States to meet specific timeframes in the provision of these services, even when one (1) parent is in a different State from where children are living. This Federal legislation sets out procedures for enforcing child support orders across State lines and establishes the concept of
"Continuing Exclusive Jurisdiction." UIFSA also simplifies income withholding across State lines by requiring employers to honor wage assignments issued by another State's court, tribunal or foreign country.
In public assistance cases, Rhode Island has the same right to initiate a proceeding as an individual RIW caretaker relative for the purpose of establishing parentage, establishing a child support and medical order, and enforcing those orders administratively or judicially. The defense that the parties are immune to a suit because of their relationship as a married couple or parent and child is not available to the non-custodial parent.
Non-assistance, Medical Assistance Only, and Foster Care cases will be referred to the Intergovernmental Unit via the referral or application process, or transfers from another OCSS unit. The intergovernmental agent will enter new cases and transfer cases.
In cases where an alleged parent lives out-of-State, the OCSS agency will first determine if there is jurisdictional basis to establish parentage the same as if the non-custodial parent lives in Rhode Island and if it is practical to do so. This is called the "long arm process." If there is no basis to exercise long arm jurisdiction, or it would be impractical or cumbersome to do so, the OCSS will initiate a petition to establish parentage.
The law of the issuing State governs the nature, extent, amount, and duration of payments. In a proceeding for arrearages, the statute of limitation under the laws of this State or of the issuing State, whichever is longer, applies.
Under 45 C.F.R. § 303.7, the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement Act multiple orders were entered on a case involving the same parties. As the parties moved from State to State new orders were entered, while the orders continued to run and accrue arrears. Under UIFSA, only one (1) child support order is the controlling order. Although the non-custodial parents would receive credit for all payments made under any order, only one (1) order is in effect. Rules had to be developed to determine which order was controlling. The following is a simplified version of the Rules used to establish which, of many orders, is the controlling order:
Rhode Island will serve as a responding State to accept the UIFSA Petition forwarded by the initiating State to locate the non-custodial parent, establish parentage, establish a Child Support and Medical order and to enforce those orders. The statutes governing Rhode Island as the responding State in an intergovernmental action are found in R.I. Gen. Laws § 15-23.1-303.
If the custodial parent is not present at the hearing and the non-custodial parent denies owing the duty of support alleged in the petition or complaint or offers evidence constituting a defense, the Family Court, upon request of either party, may continue the hearing to permit evidence relative to the duty to be adduced by either party by telephonic hearing.
If a petition is received by the Office of Child Support Services and it is inappropriate for the case to be processed and heard in Rhode Island, OCSS shall forward the pleadings to the appropriate agency for processing and notify the petitioner of the forwarding agency.
UIFSA, participation of a petitioner in a proceeding before a responding tribunal does not confer jurisdiction for other proceedings. A petitioner may not be served while present in the State. This does not apply if the petitioner commits acts while in the State that would subject him/her to civil litigation.
Laws attaching a privilege against the disclosure of communications between a married couple are inapplicable to proceedings under the R.I. Gen. Laws Chapter 15-15. A married couple are competent witnesses to testify to any relevant matter, including marriage and parentage.
If the non-custodial parent asserts as a defense that he is not the parent of the child for whom support is sought and it appears to the court that the defense is not frivolous, and if both parties are present at the hearing or the proof required indicates that the presence of either or both of the parties is not necessary, the court may adjudicate the parentage issue. Otherwise the court may adjourn the hearing until the parentage issue has been adjudicated.
A party whose parentage has been previously determined may not plead non-parentage as defense. Any contest regarding parentage must be brought in the State where the parentage was adjudicated.
This act applies if both the custodial parent and the non-custodial parent are domiciliaries and/or residents of this State.
If the duty of support is based on a foreign support order, the custodial parent has the additional remedies as provided in the R.I. Gen. Laws § 15-14.1-5.
The Office of Child Support Services may communicate with another State agency in writing, by telephone or other means, to obtain information concerning the laws of that State, the legal effect of a judgment, decree, or order of that tribunal, and the status of a proceeding in the other State. OCSS must also reciprocate and provide information upon request.
The Office of Child Support Services may request another State agency for help in obtaining discovery; and the Rhode Island Family Court may compel a person over whom it has jurisdiction to respond to a discovery order issued by another State.
Upon a finding, which may be made by ex-parte, that the health, safety, or liberty of a party or child would be unreasonably put at risk by the disclosure of identifying information, or if an existing order provides, the Rhode Island Family Court may order that the address of the child or party or other identifying information not be disclosed in a pleading or other document filed in a court file.
An income-withholding order issued in another State may be sent directly to employer in this State without first filing a petition.
218 R.I. Code R. 218-RICR-30-00-1.21
Amended effective 1/1/2021