Due dates for responsive opinions are calculated from the date of the first scheduled vote on the original proposed majority opinion, regardless of whether the case is moved to a subsequent vote list by the circulation of a responsive opinion. Generally, the first scheduled vote date will remain the threshold date in the calculation, unless the proposed majority opinion is withdrawn or the substantive analysis and/or resolution is substantially altered via a revised opinion. In such instances, the time period is calculated from the date of the first scheduled vote on the revised majority opinion. A majority author's mere defense of an already-existing analysis through revisions in the nature of rejoinder does not alter the time period for response.
Upon appropriate notice to a "holding" Justice and an opportunity to respond, the Chief Justice in his or her discretion may direct the filing of an opinion with a "holding" Justice noted as not participating in the decision of the matter, dissenting without opinion, concurring in the result, or with an opinion to follow, as the case may be. In Children's Fast Track appeals, if, within thirty (30) days of the date votes are due on majority opinions no dissent or concurrence has been placed in circulation, the case will be filed, and the dissenting or concurring Justice will be noted as not having participated in the decision of the matter.
Notwithstanding any contrary procedures set forth above, Justices shall give priority in both circulation of and voting on proposed opinions in Children's Fast Track appeals.
As a general rule, an opinion is a "concurring and dissenting opinion" when there is more than one issue and the Justice agrees with the majority's disposition of some but not all issues, and is in disagreement with the mandate. There may be occasions, however, in which a Justice may agree with the outcome but may disagree with a principle enunciated by a majority of the Court which will govern the outcome of other cases. In such instances, Justices are not strictly bound to concur outright; rather, they retain the discretion to label responses as concurring and dissenting.
Alternatively, a Justice may choose to "concur in the result" or "dissent" without writing a separate opinion, although both options are strongly disfavored if the vote is dispositive.
210 Pa. Code § 63.4