N.M. Admin. Code § 6.68.2.10

Current through Register Vol. 35, No. 21, November 5, 2024

Section 6.68.2.10 - DENIAL OF APPLICATIONS

A. Other grounds for denial of applications: Subject to the procedures set forth below, the educator ethics bureau (EEB), or the PLB may deny an application for initial or continuing licensure for incompetency, immorality or for any other good and just cause. "Other good and just cause" may include but shall not be limited to any of the following:

(1) a material misstatement of fact by an applicant in connection with the initial licensure application process or the continuing licensure application process; or

(2) the denial of an application for licensure or the suspension or revocation of an applicant's educational or other relevant professional certificate(s) or license(s) by the certification or licensing authorities of this or any other state or by a national licensing board or bureau; or

(3) material noncompliance with any provision(s) of PED rules prescribing the terms and conditions of employment contracts for licensed school personnel in New Mexico at a time when the person charged was subject to those rules; or

(4) a willful violation of any PED rule prescribing standards of conduct for licensed school personnel at a time when the person charged was subject to such requirement; or

(5) a conviction of any felony or a misdemeanor involving moral turpitude, subject to the provisions of the Criminal Offender Employment Act, Section 28-2-1, et seq., NMSA 1978; or

(6) a failure to comply with a judgment and order for support pursuant to the Parental Responsibility Act, Section 40-5A-1, NMSA 1978; or

(7) the intentional alteration of any college transcripts or any license issued by the PED in connection with any private or public employment or in any dealings with the PED; or

(8) the failure or refusal by an applicant for licensure with a criminal history to timely provide documents requested by the PED evidencing applicant's rehabilitation, satisfaction of court orders or successful termination of probation; or

(9) failing to meet the continuing education requirements for level 2 competencies where a local superintendent recommends to the secretary that the teacher's level 2 license be suspended in accordance with 6.69.4 NMAC.

B. Reporting requirements: Every school superintendent or the person designated by the governing authorities of state agencies, private schools or charter schools shall provide written notification to the director of EEB or PLB (director) of purported facts reasonably believed by a superintendent to constitute grounds under this rule for denial of an educator license or continuing licensure. At a minimum, the written notification shall include the name and address of the individual, the personnel action taken by the school district, if any, and a statement of reasons for the action. The following are not justifications for failing to report this information to the director: whether or not the personnel action is final; whether or not the personnel action was taken by a different school district; whether or not the licensed person resigned from a different school district pending investigation for misconduct; whether or not a person has been licensed for three (3) or more years; whether or not any adverse personnel action is/was reversed. Written notification shall be made to the director within 30 calendar days of the sooner of any adverse personnel action or discovering purported facts reasonably believed to constitute grounds for licensure denial. Failure of a superintendent to provide such written notification to assist the PED's licensure process shall not bar the PED from denying an application or serving notice on an applicant.

C. Recommendation for denial of application.

(1) If the director of the EEB or PLB concludes that sufficient grounds exist under Subsection A of 6.68.2.10 NMAC to serve a notice on the applicant, the procedures set forth in 6.68.2.12 NMAC shall be initiated subject to the approval of the assistant secretary for educator quality. In all other cases, the license(s) applied for shall be issued unless the applicant fails to qualify as provided in 6.68.2.9 NMAC or in Paragraph (2) of Subsection C below.

(2) If a statement from a local superintendent that an applicant has failed to satisfactorily demonstrate the competencies required by the PED for the level of license sought or held is received by the director of the PLB pursuant to Subsection A of 6.68.2.11 NMAC, the following procedures shall be followed unless the applicant otherwise fails to qualify pursuant to 6.68.2.9 or Subsection A of 6.68.2.10 NMAC:

(a) the director shall review the local superintendent's finding that the applicant has not satisfactorily demonstrated the required competencies for the level of license sought or held; and

(b) if the director finds substantial evidence that the superintendent or governing authority failed to comply with 6.68.2.11 NMAC, the director shall issue the license; or

(c) if the director finds that the local superintendent has complied with 6.68.2.11 NMAC and the applicant is either a level 1 licensee who is completing the fifth (5th) and final year of level 1 or a level 2 or 3 licensee who is subject to losing their level 2 or 3 licensure, then the director shall cause the notice, pre-hearing, hearing and secretary review procedures set forth in 6.68.2.12 NMAC and the ULA to be initiated. In all other cases where the director finds that the local superintendent has complied with 6.68.2.11 NMAC, the director shall notify the applicant of that finding within 14 days and the applicant shall then have 30 days to request that the secretary review the director's finding. In such case, the secretary shall have 30 days to review the director's finding and the secretary's decision shall be final.

N.M. Admin. Code § 6.68.2.10

6.68.2.10 NMAC - Rp, 6 NMAC 4.2.4.4.10, 11-30-05; A, 01-29-10