N.M. Admin. Code § 20.11.3.119

Current through Register Vol. 35, No. 23, December 10, 2024

Section 20.11.3.119 - CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES: INTERIM EMISSIONS IN AREAS WITHOUT MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSIONS BUDGETS

A. The transportation plan, TIP and project not from a conforming transportation plan and TIP shall satisfy the interim emissions test(s) as described in Subsections C through G of 20.11.3.109 NMAC. This criterion applies to the net effect of the action (transportation plan, TIP or project not from a conforming transportation plan and TIP) on motor vehicle emissions from the entire transportation system.

B. Ozone areas: The requirements of Subsection B of 20.11.3.119 NMAC apply to all ozone NAAQS areas, except for certain requirements as indicated. This criterion may be met:

(1) in moderate and above ozone nonattainment areas that are subject to the reasonable further progress requirements of CAA Section 182(b)(1) if a regional emissions analysis that satisfies the requirements of 20.11.3.122 NMAC and Subsections G through J of 20.11.3.119 NMAC demonstrates that for each analysis year and for each of the pollutants described in Subsection F of 20.11.3.119 NMAC:

(a) the emissions predicted in the "action" scenario are less than the emissions predicted in the "baseline" scenario, and this can be reasonably expected to be true in the periods between the analysis years; and

(b) the emissions predicted in the "action" scenario are lower than emissions in the baseline year for that NAAQS as described in Subsection E of 20.11.3.119 NMAC by any nonzero amount;

(2) in marginal and below ozone nonattainment areas and other ozone nonattainment areas that are not subject to the reasonable further progress requirements of CAA Section 182(b)(1) if a regional emissions analysis that satisfies the requirements of 20.11.3.122 NMAC and Subsections G through J of 20.11.3.119 NMAC demonstrates that for each analysis year and for each of the pollutants described in Subsection F of 20.11.3.119 NMAC:

(a) the emissions predicted in the "action" scenario are not greater than the emissions predicted in the "baseline" scenario, and this can be reasonably expected to be true in the periods between the analysis years; or

(b) the emissions predicted in the "action" scenario are not greater than emissions in the baseline year for that NAAQS as described in Subsection E of 20.11.3.119 NMAC.

C. CO areas: This criterion may be met:

(1) in moderate areas with design value greater than 12.7 ppm and serious CO nonattainment areas that are subject to CAA Section 187(a)(7) if a regional emissions analysis that satisfies the requirements of 20.11.3.122 NMAC and Subsections G through J of 20.11.3.119 NMAC demonstrates that for each analysis year and for each of the pollutants described in Subsection F of 20.11.3.119 NMAC:

(b) the emissions predicted in the "action" scenario are lower than emissions in the baseline year for that NAAQS as described in Subsection E of 20.11.3.119 NMAC by any nonzero amount;

(2) in moderate areas with design value less than 12.7 ppm and not classified CO nonattainment areas if a regional emissions analysis that satisfies the requirements of 20.11.3.122 NMAC and Subsections G through J of 20.11.3.119 NMAC demonstrates that for each analysis year and for each of the pollutants described in Subsection F of 20.11.3.119 NMAC:

(b) the emissions predicted in the "action" scenario are not greater than emissions in the baseline year for that NAAQS as described in Subsection E of 20.11.3.119 NMAC.

D. PM_2.5, PM₁₀ and NO₂ areas: This criterion may be met in PM_2.5, PM₁₀ and NO₂ nonattainment areas if a regional emissions analysis that satisfies the requirements of 20.11.3.122 NMAC and Subsections G through J of 20.11.3.119 NMAC demonstrates that for each analysis year and for each of the pollutants described in Subsection F of 20.11.3.119 NMAC, one of the following requirements is met:

(1) the emissions predicted in the "action" scenario are not greater than the emissions predicted in the "baseline" scenario, and this can be reasonably expected to be true in the periods between the analysis years; or

(2) the emissions predicted in the "action" scenario are not greater than emissions in the baseline year for that NAAQS as described in Subsection E of 20.11.3.119 NMAC; baseline emissions are those estimated to have occurred during calendar year 1990, unless the conformity implementation plan revision required by 40 CFR 51.390 defines the baseline emissions for a PM₁₀ area to be those occurring in a different calendar year for which a baseline emissions inventory was developed for the purpose of developing a control strategy implementation plan.

E. Baseline year for various NAAQS: The baseline year is defined as follows:

(1) 1990, in areas designated nonattainment for the 1990 CO NAAQS or the 1990 NO₂ NAAQS.

(2) 1990, in areas designated nonattainment for the 1990 PM₁₀ NAAQS, unless the conformity implementation plan revision required by 40 CFR 51.390 defines the baseline emissions for a PM₁₀ area to be those occurring in a different calendar year for which a baseline emissions inventory was developed for the purpose of developing a control strategy implementation plan.

(3) 2002, in areas designated nonattainment for the 1997 ozone NAAQS or 1997 PM_2.5 NAAQS.

(4) the most recent year for which EPA's Air Emissions Reporting Rule ( 40 CFR Part 51, Subpart A) requires submission of on-road mobile source emissions inventories, as of the effective date of designations in areas designated nonattainment for a NAAQS that is promulgated after 1997.

F. Pollutants: The regional emissions analysis shall be performed for the following pollutants:

(1) VOC in ozone areas;

(2) NO_x in ozone areas, unless the EPA administrator determines that additional reductions of NO_x would not contribute to attainment;

(3) CO in CO areas;

(4) PM₁₀ in PM₁₀ areas;

(5) VOC and NO_x in PM₁₀ areas if the EPA regional administrator or the director of the air agency has made a finding that one or both of such precursor emissions from within the area are a significant contributor to the PM₁₀ nonattainment problem and has so notified the MPO and DOT;

(6) NO_x in NO₂ areas;

(7) PM_2.5 in PM_2.5 areas;

(8) re-entrained road dust in PM_2.5 areas only if the EPA regional administrator or the director of the air agency has made a finding that emissions from re-entrained road dust within the area are a significant contributor to the PM_2.5 nonattainment problem and has so notified the MPO and DOT;

(9) NO_x in PM_2.5 areas, unless the EPA regional administrator and the director of the state air agency have made a finding that emissions of NO_x from within the area are not a significant contributor to the PM_2.5 nonattainment problem and has so notified the MPO and DOT; and

(10) VOC, SO₂and ammonia in PM_2.5 areas if the EPA regional administrator or the director of the state air agency has made a finding that any of such precursor emissions from within the area are a significant contributor to the PM_2.5 nonattainment problem and has so notified the MPO and DOT.

G. Analysis Years:

(1) The regional emissions analysis shall be performed for analysis years that are no more than 10 years apart. The first analysis year shall be no more than five years beyond the year in which the conformity determination is being made. The last year of the time frame of the conformity determination (as described under Subsection D of 20.11.3.106 NMAC) shall also be an analysis year.

(2) For areas using Subparagraph (a) of Paragraph (2) of Subsection B, Subparagraph (a) of Paragraph (2) of Subsection C, and Paragraph (1) of Subsection D of 20.11.3.119 NMAC, a regional emissions analysis that satisfies the requirements of 20.11.3.122 NMAC and Subsections G through J of 20.11.3.119 NMAC would not be required for analysis years in which the transportation projects and planning assumptions in the action and "baseline" scenarios are exactly the same. In such a case, Subsection A of 20.11.3.119 NMAC can be satisfied by documenting that the transportation projects and planning assumptions in both scenarios are exactly the same, and consequently, the emissions predicted in the "action" scenario are not greater than the emissions predicted in the "baseline" scenario for such analysis years.

(3) When the time frame of the conformity determination is shortened under Paragraph (2) of Subsection D of 20.11.3.106 NMAC, the conformity determination must be accompanied by a regional emissions analysis (for informational purposes only) for the last year of the transportation plan.

H. "Baseline" scenario: The regional emissions analysis required by Subsections B through E of 20.11.3.119 NMAC shall estimate the emissions that would result from the "baseline" scenario in each analysis year. The "baseline" scenario shall be defined for each of the analysis years. The "baseline" scenario is the future transportation system that shall result from current programs; including the following (except that exempt projects list in 20.11.3.126 NMAC and projects exempt from regional emissions analysis as listed in 20.11.3.127 NMAC need not be explicitly considered):

(1) all in-place regionally significant highway and transit facilities, services and activities;

(2) all ongoing travel demand management or transportation system management activities; and

(3) completion of all regionally significant projects, regardless of funding source, which are currently under construction or are undergoing right-of-way acquisition (except for hardship acquisition and protective buying); come from the first year of the previously conforming transportation plan or TIP; or have completed the NEPA process.

I. "Action" scenario: The regional emissions analysis required by Subsections B through E of 20.11.3.119 NMAC shall estimate the emissions that would result from the "action" scenario in each analysis year. The "action" scenario shall be defined for each of the analysis years. The "action" scenario is the transportation system that would result from the implementation of the proposed action (MTP, TIP or project not from a conforming transportation plan and TIP) and all other expected regionally significant projects in the nonattainment area. The "action" scenario shall include the following (except that exempt projects listed in 20.11.3.126 NMAC and projects exempt from regional emissions analysis as listed in 20.11.3.127 NMAC need not be explicitly considered):

(1) all facilities, services and activities in the "baseline" scenario;

(2) completion of all TCMs and regionally significant projects (including facilities, services, and activities) specifically identified in the proposed transportation plan which shall be operational or in effect in the analysis year, except that regulatory TCMs may not be assumed to begin at a future time unless the regulation is already adopted by the enforcing jurisdiction or the TCM is identified in the applicable implementation plan;

(3) all travel demand management programs and transportation system management activities known to the MPO, but not included in the applicable implementation plan or utilizing any federal funding or approval, which have been fully adopted or funded by the enforcing jurisdiction or sponsoring agency since the last conformity determination;

(4) the incremental effects of any travel demand management programs and transportation system management activities known to the MPO, but not included in the applicable implementation plan or utilizing any federal funding or approval, which were adopted or funded prior to the date of the last conformity determination, but which have been modified since then to be more stringent or effective;

(5) completion of all expected regionally significant highway and transit projects which are not from a conforming transportation plan and TIP; and

(6) completion of all expected regionally significant non-FHWA/FTA highway and transit projects that have clear funding sources and commitments leading toward their implementation and completion by the analysis year.

J. Projects not from a conforming transportation plan and TIP: For the regional emissions analysis required by Subsections B through E of 20.11.3.119 NMAC, if the project which is not from a conforming transportation plan and TIP is a modification of a project currently in the plan or TIP, the "baseline" scenario shall include the project with its original design concept and scope, and the "action" scenario shall include the project with its new design concept and scope.

N.M. Admin. Code § 20.11.3.119

20.11.3.119 NMAC - Rn & A, 20.11.3.216 NMAC, 11/15/10; A, 10/15/12