CASE NOTES
Former N.J.A.C. 8:30-14.4(a), which required nursing homes to make available "a reasonable number of their beds to indigent persons" as a condition of licensure under 26:2H-5, 26:2H-8, and 26:2H-12, did not exceed the power given to the State under 26:2H-1 et seq.; the argument that the State was attempting to regulate the quantity of health care services, rather than the quality of health care services was rejected because the acute shortage of nursing home beds for indigent persons was a public health concern, and the regulations were not arbitrary or unreasonable. In re Health Care Admin. Board, 83 N.J. 67, 415 A.2d 1147, 1980 N.J. LEXIS 1365 (1980), writ of certiorari denied by 449 U.S. 944, 101 S. Ct. 342, 66 L. Ed. 2d 208, 1980 U.S. LEXIS 3668, 49 U.S.L.W. 3331 (1980).
Former N.J.A.C. 8:30-14.4(a), which required nursing homes to make available "a reasonable number of their beds to indigent persons" as a condition of licensure under 26:2H-5, did not constitute a taking without just compensation under N.J. Const. art. I, para. 20 because the regulation served a valid public purpose and the nursing home was given a right to administrative and judicial review of any allotment of beds. In re Health Care Admin. Board, 83 N.J. 67, 415 A.2d 1147, 1980 N.J. LEXIS 1365 (1980), writ of certiorari denied by 449 U.S. 944, 101 S. Ct. 342, 66 L. Ed. 2d 208, 1980 U.S. LEXIS 3668, 49 U.S.L.W. 3331 (1980).
Former N.J.A.C. 8:30-14.4(a), which required nursing homes to make available "a reasonable number of their beds to indigent persons" as a condition of licensure under 26:2H-5, did not violate the equal protection rights of private facilities because the private facilities were involved in a quasi-public activity and were therefore subject to extensive regulation in the public interest; the classification was not suspect and did not implicate a fundamental right and the nursing home's obligation to serve the public interest was rationally related to the regulations. In re Health Care Admin. Board, 83 N.J. 67, 415 A.2d 1147, 1980 N.J. LEXIS 1365 (1980), writ of certiorari denied by 449 U.S. 944, 101 S. Ct. 342, 66 L. Ed. 2d 208, 1980 U.S. LEXIS 3668, 49 U.S.L.W. 3331 (1980).
Former N.J.A.C. 8:30-14.4(a), which required nursing homes to make available "a reasonable number of their beds to indigent persons" as a condition of licensure under 26:2H-5, did not conflict with the federal Medicaid statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1396 et seq.; there was no factual evidence presented to support the claim that the reimbursement rates set in the program violated the federal rates or that compelled participation in the state program violated the voluntary nature of the federal program, constituting an unjust taking, because there was no requirement in the regulations that a facility seek reimbursement from Medicaid. In re Health Care Admin. Board, 83 N.J. 67, 415 A.2d 1147, 1980 N.J. LEXIS 1365 (1980), writ of certiorari denied by 449 U.S. 944, 101 S. Ct. 342, 66 L. Ed. 2d 208, 1980 U.S. LEXIS 3668, 49 U.S.L.W. 3331 (1980).
N.J. Admin. Code § 8:39-5.1