Careful study of the Crawford case, specifically including the Fifth Circuit's opinion, eliminates some misconceptions. An extended school year is:
NOTE: For a child who is not in regular attendance, during the first ten (10) weeks of instruction, sufficient time may be added to the recoupment period to make sure that the child has received ten (10) weeks of instruction.
A review of the literature, as well as practical experience, indicates that both students with disabilities and students without disabilities regress during breaks in instruction. The amount of regression and the length of time required to recoup previously mastered skills varies widely among all students.
It is the policy of the State Department of Education that when necessary to insure a free appropriate public education (FAPE), each local school district shall offer an extended school year to those students with disabilities who's Regression-Recoupment Syndrome is so severe that it can be predicted that they will have gained no educational benefit from their previous year's educational program (as defined in the IEP) without an extended school year. The purpose of the extended program is to maintain each student's mastered skills so that the summer vacation periods will not render the previous year's educational program of no educational benefit.
The need for an extended school year must be considered on at least an annual basis at an IEP meeting. The IEP Committee must review available data relative to the student's mastered skills and educational history. Based on this review, the IEP Committee must predict whether the regression that will occur because of the lengthy break in instruction (summer vacation) will be to such a marked degree that recoupment of a previously mastered skill(s) will not occur during the first ten (10) weeks of instruction in the following school year or the loss of one or more acquired critical skills addressed in the current IEP would be unusually substantial and severe. It is possible that the extended school year may only include the maintenance of skills previously mastered as a result of a related service if loss of that skill will result in no educational benefit. Generally speaking, students with disabilities who require an extended school year will have severe problems in one or more of the following areas:
The following list contains some of the information which may be helpful when preparing to make the decision about an extended school year:
After gathering available data, consider the following while making the decision as to whether an extended school year is to be provided for the child:
On at least an annual basis at an IEP meeting, the decision regarding ESY services must be documented and maintained in the student's file. This decision is not irreversible. At any time that data maintained on the student indicates that the ESY decision was incorrect, IEP revision procedures must be followed to change the decision.
When it is determined that a student meets the criteria for an extended school year, the specific skill(s) to be maintained must be identified on the IEP. The IEP Committee must also address the amount of time per day, the number of days per week and the number of weeks that the instruction will be provided to maintain the skills. While students who require an extended school year generally need intensive instruction during the regular school year to show progress it is probable that mastered skills can be maintained across the summer with less instruction.
If a related service is required for educational benefit during the Extended School Year, skills to be maintained must be those listed within the IEP.
The IEP Committee must consider the unique needs of each student when deciding the type of educational programs required to maintain mastered skills. Some alternatives the district might consider are:
The ESY handbook can be found at the following Website: MS Secretary of State Office, Regulations and Enforcement, Administrative Code, Title 7 Education.
7 Miss. Code. R. 3-74.12