The competitive sealed qualifications procurement method is used when the qualifications or specialized expertise of the respondent is critical to meet the needs of the agency and is the most important factor in selection. Single or multiple awards may be made depending upon the number of respondents needed by the agency to provide the service. Competitive sealed qualifications are sought through a Request for Qualifications (hereinafter referred to as "RFQ"). Respondents to the RFQ must submit a Statement of Qualifications (hereinafter referred to as "SOQ"). A contract may be entered into by competitive sealed qualifications as provided herein.
The RFQ shall include, but is not limited to, the following information:
Public notice of the RFQ shall be given in the same manner as provided in Sections 3-202.01(c) and 3-202.06 (Competitive Sealed Bidding, Public Notice).
Amendments to RFQ's may be made in accordance with Section 3-202.08 (Amendments to Invitations for Bids) prior to submission of SOQ packets. After submission, amendments may be made in accordance with Section 3-202.19.2 (Procedure for Phase-One of Multi-Step Sealed Bidding, Amendments to the Invitation for Bid).
SOQ packets may be withdrawn prior to the established due date in accordance with Section 3-202.09 (Pre-Opening Modification or Withdrawal of Bids). For the purposes of this section and Section 3-204.06 (Late Proposals, Late Withdrawals, and Late Modifications) below, the established due date is the time and date set by the RFQ for receipt of submissions.
Any SOQ packet received after the established due date is late. See Section 3-203.10 (Modification or Withdrawal of Proposals) for the definition of "established due date." Packets not received at the place designated for receipt of submissions are late. Late packets may only be considered in accordance with Section 3-202.10 (Late Bids, Late Withdrawals, and Late Modifications).
The SOQ packets shall be opened in the presence of two or more agency officials. The submitted packets shall be date-stamped or time/date-stamped upon receipt and held in a secure place until the established due date.
After the date established for receipt of SOQs, a Register of Respondents shall be prepared by the Procurement Officer which shall include for all SOQs:
The Procurement Officer shall examine the SOQ packets to identify any written requests for nondisclosure of trade secrets and other proprietary data. Any disclosure of this information is subject to the provisions of Mississippi Code Annotated §§ 25-61-9 and 79-23-1.
The Agency Head shall appoint an evaluation committee.
The committee shall evaluate each SOQ packet as provided in the RFQ. The committee shall classify SOQ packets as acceptable, potentially acceptable, or unacceptable. For any packet classified as unacceptable, the respondent shall be promptly notified in writing of the classification and the reasons therefor. A copy of the written notification shall be kept in the procurement file. If a packet is classified as unacceptable, the Agency Head or his designee shall record in writing the basis for the finding of unacceptability and make it part of the procurement file.
If provided in the RFQ, discussions may be held with individual respondents as provided in Section 3-204.10. If discussions are not held, the evaluation committee shall provide the Procurement Officer with a list of all acceptable respondents, ranking them in order of highest to lowest qualified. If discussions are held, the committee shall provide the list after consideration and evaluation of the information provided during the discussions. Only respondents classified as acceptable after discussions, if any, shall be included on the list.
Discussions may only be held with respondents whose SOQ packets are classified as acceptable or potentially acceptable. All respondents so classified shall be given an equal and fair opportunity to participate in individual discussions. The purpose of discussions is to determine in greater detail each respondent's qualifications and to determine if a respondent classified as potentially acceptable should be reclassified as acceptable.
The Procurement Officer shall keep a record of the date, place, attendees, and a summary of the discussions of any such meeting, and make it part of the procurement file.
Price may be determined using one of the following methods:
Multi-step sealed qualifications is designed to obtain the benefits of consideration of price and at the same time obtain the benefits of the competitive sealed qualifications procedure through the solicitation of statements of qualifications and the conduct of discussions and evaluation of statements of qualifications to determine the most qualified respondent.
Multi-step sealed qualifications is a two-phase process consisting of the following:
The multi-step sealed qualifications method may be used when it is not practical for the agency to determine the price prior to the procurement and when the qualifications or specialized expertise of the respondent is critical to meet the needs of the agency and is the most important factor in selection.
Phase One shall be conducted in accordance with Sections 3-204.01-3-204.10 except that respondents deemed qualified shall be ranked as most to least qualified.
Multi-step sealed qualifications shall be initiated by issuance of a Request for Qualifications in the form required by Section 3-204.02, except as hereinafter provided. In addition to the requirements set forth in Section 3-204.02, the multi-step sealed qualifications shall state:
Upon completion of Phase One, the Procurement Officer shall either:
Pricing documents shall be opened in the presence of two or more agency officials. The submitted documents shall be date-stamped or time/date-stamped upon receipt and held in a secure place until the established due date.
The procurement officials will then evaluate the submitted statements of qualifications and pricing documents together, using the weighted criteria set from the Request for Qualifications, including the set weight for price for the second phase. The respondents will then be ranked from highest to lowest based on the scoring of the weighted criteria, including price.
Mistakes may be corrected or statements of qualifications may be withdrawn during Phase One at any time. During Phase Two, mistakes may be corrected or withdrawal permitted in accordance with Section 3-202.12 (Mistakes in Bids).
Award shall be made to the highest ranked respondent, or respondents, if multiple contracts are required based upon the needs of the agency. The Agency Head or his designee shall make a written determination showing the basis on which the award was found to be most advantageous to the State based on the factors set forth in the RFQ. The written determination shall be maintained in the procurement file. This shall include an analysis describing why the personal or professional services contract was awarded, renewed, or amended to be published in accordance with Section 2-204.12 (Publicizing Award).
Written notice of award shall be sent to all respondents and copies of such notices shall be maintained in the procurement file. Notice of award shall be made available to the public in accordance with Executive Order 1362. The public notice of award must be accompanied by an analysis describing why the personal or professional services contract was awarded, renewed, or amended.
27 Miss. Code. R. 100-3-204