18 Miss. Code R. § 15-1-1-3

Current through October 31, 2024
Section 18-15-1-1-3 - State Plan Development and Statewide Goals
3.1.CSBG Lead Agency Mission and Responsibilities: Briefly describe the mission and responsibilities of the state agency that serves as the CSBG lead agency.

CSBG is administered by the Mississippi Department of Human Services (MDHS)- Division of Community Services. MDHS is a primary link between families and individuals with specific needs vital to their survival and the services available to meet those needs.

The Mississippi Department of Human Services is dedicated to serving others while providing a wide range of public assistance programs, social services and support for children, low-income individuals and families. The agency seeks to empower families so they can become self-sufficient and responsible for their future success through:

Professional, accountable, and responsible administration of CSBG;

Development of effective partnerships with CSBG entities, MDHS-DCS, the state association and other State and Federal programs serving low-income individuals.

3.2.State Plan Goals: Describe the state's CSBG-specific goals for state administration of CSBG under this State Plan.

GUIDANCE: States should consider feedback from OCS, their eligible entities, and the ACSI survey completed by eligible entities when creating their State Plan goals.

Instructional Note: For examples of "goals," see State Accountability Measure 1Sa(i).

Note: This information is associated with State Accountability Measure 1Sa(i) and pre-populates the state's Annual Report, Module 1, Item B.1.

The State plans to use funds for Leadership Training and Compliance Training for CAA's.

3.3.State Plan Development: Indicate the information and input the state accessed to develop this State Plan.
3.3a.Analysis of state-level tools [Check all that applies and narrative where applicable]

[x] State Performance Indicators and/or National Performance Indicators (NPIs)

[x] U.S. Census data

[x] State performance management data (e.g., accountability measures, ACSI survey information, and/or other information from annual reports)

[] Monitoring Visits/Assessments

[] Tools not identified above (specify)

3.3b.Analysis of local-level tools [Check all that applies and narrative where applicable]

[x] Eligible entity community needs assessments

[x] Eligible entity community action plans

[x] Public Hearings/Workshops

[] Tools not identified above (e.g., state required reports) [specify]

3.3c.Consultation with [Check all that applies and narrative where applicable]

[x] Eligible entities (e.g., meetings, conferences, webinars; not including the public hearing)

[x] State Association

[] National Association for State Community Services Programs (NASCSP)

[] Community Action Partnership (The Partnership)

[] Community Action Program Legal Services (CAPLAW)

[] CSBG Tribal Training and Technical Assistance (T/TA) provider

[] Regional Performance Innovation Consortium (RPIC)

[] Association for Nationally Certified ROMA Trainers (ANCRT)

[] Federal CSBG Office

[] Organizations not identified above (specify)

3.4.Eligible Entity Involvement
3.4a.State Plan Development: Describe the specific steps the state took in developing the State Plan to involve the eligible entities.

Note: This information is associated with State Accountability Measures 1Sa(ii) and may pre-populate the state's annual report form.

A copy of the draft state plan was emailed to the eligible entities and the state association. The State attended an association meeting to discuss the state plan and asked for comments and suggestions. The state plan was added to the Virtual ROMA website for all eligible entity staff to provide feedback. The state plan was presented at the public hearing for input and comments. Comments will be accepted through July 6, 2023.

3.4b.Performance Management Adjustment: Describe how the state has adjusted its State Plan development procedures under this State Plan, as compared to previous plans, in order to 1) encourage eligible entity participation and 2) ensure the State Plan reflects input from eligible entities? Any adjustment should be based on the state's analysis of past performance in these areas, and should consider feedback from eligible entities, OCS, and other sources, such as the public hearing. If the state is not making any adjustments, provide further detail.

Note: This information is associated with State Accountability Measures 1Sb(i) and (ii) and pre-populate the Annual Report, Module 1, Item B.1.

The State's process allows the state plan to be electronically submitted to entities which improves the efficiency of responses from all entity staff to include all levels (case workers, receptionists, etc.)

3.5.Eligible Entity Overall Satisfaction: Provide the state's target for eligible entity Overall Satisfaction during the performance period.

Year One: 75% Year Two: Click or tap here to enter text.

Instructional Note: The state's target score will indicate improvement or maintenance of the states' Overall Satisfaction score from the most recent American Customer Survey Index (ACSI) survey of the state's eligible entities.

Note: Item 3.5 is associated with State Accountability Measure 8S and may pre-populate the state's annual report form.

GUIDANCE: The targets reported here should match the future target set in the Annual Report, Section B, Table B.2.

GUIDANCE: Review the ACSI IM about setting targets for your eligible entity overall satisfaction that are realistic, reasonable, attainable, and possible.

18 Miss. Code. R. § 15-1-1-3

Adopted 9/3/2015
Amended 10/15/2016
Amended 12/13/2017
Amended 12/20/2018
Amended 2/14/2020
Amended 4/12/2021
Amended 1/9/2022
Amended 2/23/2024