Current through Vol. 24-19, November 1, 2024
Section R. 336.2908 - Conditions for approval of a major new source review permit in a nonattainment areaRule 1908.
(1) The department may only issue a permit approving the construction of a new major stationary source or major modification in a nonattainment area if the department has determined that the owner or operator of the major stationary source or major modification will comply with all of the provisions of this rule.(2) The owner or operator of the proposed major stationary source or major modification shall provide an analysis of alternative sites, sizes, production processes, and environmental control techniques for the proposed major stationary source or major modification which demonstrates that the benefits of the proposed major stationary source or major modification significantly outweigh the environmental and social costs imposed as a result of its location, construction, or modification.(3) The major stationary source or major modification shall comply with the lowest achievable emissions rate for each regulated new source review pollutant for which the area is designated as nonattainment.(4) All stationary sources which have a potential to emit 100 or more tons per year of any air contaminant regulated under the clean air act, which are located in the state, and which are owned or controlled by the owner, operator, or an entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with, the owner or operator of the proposed major stationary source or major modification shall be in compliance with all applicable local, state, and federal air quality regulations or and shall be in compliance with a legally enforceable permit condition or order of the department specifying a plan and timetable for compliance.(5) Before the start-up of the new major stationary source or major modification, an emission reduction offset for each major nonattainment air contaminant shall be provided consistent with the following provisions:(a) The baseline for determining credit for emissions reductions is the emissions limit under the state implementation plan in effect at the time the application to construct is filed, except that the offset baseline shall be the actual emissions of the source from which offset credit is obtained where either of the following occurs: (i) The demonstration of reasonable further progress and attainment of ambient air quality standards is based upon the actual emissions of sources located within the nonattainment area.(ii) The state implementation plan does not contain an emissions limitation for that source or source category.(b) The following requirements apply to emissions offset credits: (i) Where the allowable emissions are greater emissions than the potential to emit of the source, emissions offset credit shall be allowed only for control below this potential.(ii) For an existing fuel combustion source, credit shall be based on the sources allowable emissions for the type of fuel being burned at the time the application to construct is filed. If the existing source commits to switch to a cleaner fuel at some future date, then emissions offset credit based on the allowable, or actual, emissions for the fuels involved is not acceptable, unless the permit is conditioned to require the use of a specified alternative control measure which would achieve the same degree of emissions reduction should the source switch back to a dirtier fuel at some later date. The department shall ensure that adequate long-term supplies of the new fuel are available before granting emissions offset credit for fuel switches.(c) An emission reduction credit shall not be creditable as an emission offset unless it meets the following requirements:(i) Emissions reductions that have been achieved by shutting down an existing emission unit or curtailing production or operating hours may be generally credited for offsets only if they meet all of the following requirements: (A) The reductions are surplus, permanent, quantifiable and federally enforceable.(B) The shutdown or curtailment occurred after the last day of the base year for the SIP planning process. The department may choose to consider a prior shutdown or curtailment to have occurred after the last day of the base year if the projected emissions inventory used to develop the attainment demonstration explicitly includes emissions from such previously shutdown or curtailed emission units. However, credit shall not be given for shutdowns that occurred before August 7, 1977.(ii) Emissions reductions that are achieved by shutting down an existing emissions unit or curtailing production or operating hours and that do not meet the requirements of R 336.2908(5)(c)(i)(A) and (B) may be generally credited only if they meet either of the following: (A) The shutdown or curtailment occurred on or after the date the construction permit application is filed.(B) The applicant can establish that the proposed new emissions unit is a replacement for the shutdown or curtailed emissions unit, and the emissions reductions are surplus, permanent, quantifiable and federally enforceable.(d) Emissions credit shall not be allowed for replacing 1 hydrocarbon compound with another of lesser reactivity, except for those compounds listed in table 1 of the United States environmental protection agency's "Recommended Policy on Control of Volatile Organic Compounds," 42 FR 35314, adopted by reference in R 336.1902.(e) All emission reductions claimed as offset credit shall be federally enforceable.(f) Offsets shall be obtained from the same nonattainment area as the proposed major source or major modification, except another nonattainment area may be used if both of the following conditions are met:(i) The other area has an equal or higher nonattainment classification than the area in which the proposed source is located.(ii) Nonattainment air contaminant emissions from the other area contribute to a violation of a national ambient air quality standard in the nonattainment area in which the proposed major source or major modification would be located.(g) Credit for an emissions reduction may be claimed to the extent that the reviewing authority has not relied on it in issuing any permit required by R 336.1220 or R 336.2902 and the department has not relied on it in demonstrating attainment or reasonable further progress.(h) The total tonnage of increased emissions, in tons per year, resulting from a major modification that must be offset shall be determined by summing the difference between the allowable emissions after the modification and the actual emissions before the modification for each emissions unit. Unless specified otherwise in this rule, the offset ratio for each nonattainment air pollutant that will be emitted in significant amounts from a new major source or major modification located in a nonattainment area that is subject to subpart 1, part D, title 1of the clean air act shall be at least 1:1.(i) The provisions of this subrule do not apply to emissions resulting from proposed major sources or major modifications to the extent that the emissions are temporary and will not prevent reasonable further progress towards attainment of any applicable standard. Examples of temporary emissions include emissions from all of the following: (ii) Portable facilities which will be relocated outside the nonattainment area within 18 months.(iii) The construction phase of a new major stationary source or major modification.(6) For facilities meeting the emissions offset requirements of R 336.2908(5) for ozone nonattainment areas that are subject to subpart 2, part D, title 1 of the clean air act, the facility must meet the following requirements:(a) The ratio of total actual emissions reductions of Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) or Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) to the emissions increase of VOC or NOx shall be as follows: (i) In any marginal nonattainment area for ozone, the ratio shall be 1.1:1.(ii) In any moderate nonattainment area for ozone, the ratio shall be 1.15:1.(iii) In any serious nonattainment area for ozone, the ratio shall be 1.2:1.(iv) In any severe nonattainment area for ozone, the ratio shall be 1.3:1, except that the ratio may be 1.2:1 if all existing major sources in the severe nonattainment area use BACT for the control of VOC.(v) In any extreme nonattainment area for ozone, the ratio shall be 1.5:1, except that the ratio may be 1.2:1 if all existing major sources in the extreme nonattainment area use BACT for the control of VOC.(b) Notwithstanding the requirements of R 336.2908(6)(a) for meeting the requirements of R 336.2908(5), the ratio of total actual emissions reductions of VOC to the emissions increase of VOC shall be 1.15:1 for all areas within an ozone transport region that is subject to subpart 2, part D, title 1 of the clean air act except for serious, severe, and extreme ozone nonattainment areas that are subject to subpart 2, part D, title 1 of the clean air act.(c) For each facility meeting the emissions offset requirements of R 336.2908(5) for ozone nonattainment areas that are subject to subpart 1, part D, title 1 of the clean air act but are not subject to subpart 2, part D, title 1 of the clean air act, including 8-hour ozone nonattainment areas subject to 40 C.F.R. 51.902(b), adopted by reference in R 336.1902, the ratio of total actual emissions reductions of VOC to the emissions increase of VOC shall be 1:1.(7) The requirements of this section that apply to major stationary sources and major modifications of PM-10 and PM 2.5 shall also apply to major stationary sources and major modifications of PM-10 and PM 2.5 precursors, except when the department determines that such sources do not contribute significantly to PM-10 and PM 2.5 levels that exceed the PM-10 and PM 2.5 ambient standards in the area.Mich. Admin. Code R. 336.2908
2008 AACS; 2012 AACS; 2019 MR 1, Eff. 1/2/2019An obvious error in R 336.2901 was corrected at the request of the promulgating agency, pursuant to Section 56 of 1969 PA 306, as amended by 2000 PA 262, MCL 24.256. The rule containing the error was published in Michigan Register, 2019 MR 1. The memorandum requesting the correction was published in Michigan Register, 2019 MR 2