Hearings may be initiated by either an "appellant" or by the Department. Hearings initiated by an appellant are done so pursuant to an appeal (sometimes referred to as a "request") for a hearing. Hearings initiated by the Department are done so pursuant to a "notice" of hearing which is sent to the person whose rights are at stake ("respondent"). When the Department initiates a hearing, material concerning the hearing appears in a "notice" prepared by the Departmental division involved. This notice is sent to the other parties and the Division of Administrative Hearings.
When an appellant initiates a hearing, the request for the hearing is referred to the Departmental division or other entity involved. The Departmental division or other entity then processes the request by preparing a "Hearing Report". Generally, the Hearing Report together with the request for hearing is sent directly to the Division of Administrative Hearings. In certain instances, the "Hearing Report" and request for hearing are sent to the Commissioner. In the latter instance, the Commissioner may elect to refer the matter to the Division of Administrative Hearings with special instructions, usually reserving for the Commissioner final decision-making authority with respect to that particular matter. In such cases, the Commissioner refers the request to the Division of Administrative Hearings under an "Order of Reference", see generally Section VI(B)(5), below.
When the Commissioner has determined whether to issue an Order of Reference, he/she/they will refer the hearing request to the Division of Administrative Hearings for processing.
Any matter handled by the Commissioner under this section may be delegated to the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer by the Commissioner.
Where it appears that the matter should be treated pursuant to an Order of Reference, the Division of Administrative Hearings may first forward the case to the Office of the Commissioner for processing pursuant to Section VI(B)(5) above.
Nothing in this section shall be construed as diminishing the authority of a Departmental division to schedule hearings itself pursuant to Section VI(D)(1).
Any party may request a rescheduling or a continuance of a hearing. The Division of Administrative Hearings may reschedule or continue a hearing.
When scheduling a good cause hearing, the Division of Administrative Hearings shall notify the requesting party in advance of the advantage of bringing documentation and witnesses in support of the good cause claim and of the possible consequences if the Hearing Officer finds against the party on this issue.
If a Hearing Officer finds good cause, the request for a hearing shall be immediately reinstated and the matter shall proceed to hearing as if the party seeking reinstatement had not failed to appear. If good cause is not found, the request for hearing is not reinstated and the decision of the action being appealed shall take effect or remain in effect, or the decision issued by the Hearing Officer shall take effect, as the case may be.
The consent decision ordered on February 14, 1995 in the matter of Mann v. Commissioner, Maine Department of Human Services specifies content and procedural requirements for subpoenas issued by DAH. See Mann v. Commissioner, Maine Department of Human Services, No. CV-94-424, Me. Super. 1995 (February 14, 1995). A copy of the Consent Judgment is available at https://www.maine.gov/dhhs/about-us/administrative-hearings.
The request shall be approved if the evidence or testimony sought reasonably appears to be relevant to any issue of fact in the proceeding. If a party requests the presence of a current employee of the Maine Department of Health and Human Services and the evidence or testimony sought reasonably appears to be relevant to any issue of fact in the proceeding, then the Maine Department of Health and Human Services shall secure the presence of the employee without issuance of a subpoena.
Applicants for and recipients of "means tested" benefit programs (such as but not limited to, Temporary Aid for Needy Families (TANF), Medical Assistance, SNAP, General Assistance, Emergency Assistance, and other programs funded by the Department under Title XX Social Services block grants) when appealing Departmental actions affecting those benefits and recipients of child support enforcement services from the Division of Support Enforcement and Recovery.
When a party is exempt from paying witness fees, the Department of Health and Human Services shall be responsible for the payment of witness fees.
The party requesting the subpoena is responsible for service of the subpoena unless the party is one of those described in Section VI(H)(c)(i). In such cases the Departmental Division involved in the hearing shall be responsible for expense of service of the subpoena.
Unless the Hearing Officer finds that at least one of the above conditions exists, the Hearing Officer shall deny the petition to vacate or modify the subpoena.
Continuances of hearings shall be liberally granted in cases where a witness fails to attend in response to a subpoena.
The appellant, respondent, and intervenor shall have the right to:
The Department shall designate a single staff person or contractor who may be represented by an Assistant Attorney General. The Department's representative shall:
The Hearing Officer shall have full and exclusive control of the conduct of the hearing. In cases of disorder or refusal to comply with the rules of the hearing or orders of the Hearing Officer, the Hearing Officer shall use reasonable means to control the hearing. Parties, representatives, and witnesses shall not engage in bitter exchanges, vulgarities, or abuse or make offensive or insulting comments. When such conduct occurs, the Hearing Officer shall admonish the offender, reminding the person that such behavior does not contribute to a fair hearing and impedes the orderly disposition of a case. If the offense is repeated and further admonition appears fruitless, the Hearing Officer shall exclude a disorderly person from the hearing. If the disorderly person is a party, the party shall be warned that if the unacceptable behavior continues the Hearing Officer shall treat the party as having abandoned the hearing. If the party continues to engage in the unacceptable behavior after having been warned by the Hearing Officer, the Hearing Officer may terminate the hearing and dismiss the hearing as abandoned by the party.
10-144 C.M.R. ch. 1, § VI