Locating most new subdistricts for commercial activities and residential subdivisions close to existing development and public services reduces public costs; improves the economic health of existing communities; protects important habitat; and minimizes interference with natural resource based activities such as forestry, agriculture, and recreation. In some cases, land uses that must be conducted near a natural resource or are closely tied to a natural resource should be allowed to locate away from development to ensure a continued natural resource-based economy and a reasonable opportunity for residential development in select locations.
The following minor civil divisions are rural hubs: Ashland, Bethel, Bingham, Calais, Caribou, Carrabassett Valley, Dover-Foxcroft, Eastport, Ellsworth, Farmington, Fort Kent, Gouldsboro, Greenville, Guilford, Houlton, Island Falls, Jackman, Jonesport, Kingfield, Lincoln, Lubec, Machias, Madawaska, Medway, Milbridge, Millinocket, Milo, Oakfield, Old Town, Patten, Presque Isle, Princeton, Rangeley, Rockwood Strip T1 R1 NBKP, Rumford, Saint Agatha, Unity, Van Buren, and Waterford.
Aroostook County | Piscataquis County |
North Yarmouth Academy Grant Twp. | Big Moose Twp. |
T1 R5 WELS | Bowdoin College Grant West Twp. |
T3 R3 WELS | Elliotsville Twp. |
Upper Molunkus Twp. | Lily Bay Twp. |
Franklin County | Somerset County |
Mount Abram Twp. | Carrying Place Town Twp. |
Redington Twp. | Dead River Twp. Johnson Mountain Twp. |
Hancock County | Lexington Twp. |
T7 SD BPP | Long Pond Twp. Misery Twp. |
Oxford County | Misery Gore Twp. |
Andover West Surplus Twp. | Pierce Pond Twp. Rockwood Strip T2 R1 NBKP |
Penobscot County | Sandwich Academy Grant Twp. |
Argyle Twp. | Sapling Twp. |
T1 R6 WELS | Taunton & Raynham Academy |
T3 R7 WELS | Grant |
T4 R7 WELS | T3 R4 BKP WKR |
Table 10.08 -A-1. Areas removed or excluded from primary and secondary locations.
Notwithstanding Section 10.08-A ,C, certain location dependent activities may be located in accordance with the following:
When land proposed for rezoning is required to be accessible from a public road by a legal right of access, a petitioner must demonstrate a legally enforceable right to access the land by road or by water.
Under either option, if the road over which legal access is provided does not exist, it must be reasonable that the road could be built. Additionally, the access must be sufficient to support the land uses allowed in the proposed subdistrict, including any associated construction, maintenance and use of structures, and decommissioning. An easement providing for vehicular access may contain reasonable provisions to minimize the burden on the underlying fee owner, such as provisions that: allow for closure of the road during spring mud conditions; allow for closure during the winter to avoid snow plowing, provided pedestrian and snowmobile access is allowed; and establish road standards and reasonable maintenance expectations and responsibilities.
01-672 C.M.R. ch. 10, § I-08-A