Notwithstanding the deregulation of a communications service or facility pursuant to Iowa Code section 476.1D, complaints alleging an unauthorized change in telecommunications service (more information is contained in the "Unauthorized changes in telecommunications service" rule in 199-Chapter 22) will be processed pursuant to this chapter with the following additional or substituted procedures:
(1) Upon receipt of the complaint and with the customer's acknowledgment, a copy of the complaint or a notification of receipt of a telephone or other oral complaint will be forwarded to the executing service provider and the preferred service provider as a request for a change in the customer's service to the customer's preferred service provider, unless the service has already been changed to the preferred service provider.(2) The complaint or notification of receipt of a telephone or other oral complaint will also be forwarded to the alleged unauthorized service provider. That entity shall file a response to the complaint within 20 days of the date the complaint or notification of receipt of a telephone or other oral complaint was forwarded. The response must include proof of verification of the customer's authorization for a change in service or a statement that the unauthorized service provider does not have such proof of verification.(3) If the alleged unauthorized service provider includes with its response alleged proof of verification of the customer's authorization for a change in service, the response will be forwarded to the customer. The customer will have ten days to challenge the verification or otherwise reply to the service provider's response.(4) As a part of the informal complaint proceedings, commission staff may issue a proposed resolution to determine the potential liability, including assessment of damages, for unauthorized changes in service among the customer, the previous service provider, the executing service provider, and the submitting service provider, and any other interested person. In all cases, the proposed resolution shall allocate responsibility among the interested persons on the basis of their relative responsibility for the events that are the subject matter of the complaint. For purposes of this rule and in the absence of unusual circumstances, the term "damages" means charges directly relating to the telecommunications services provided to the customer that have appeared or may appear on the customer's bill. The term "damages" does not include incidental, consequential, or punitive damages.(5) If the complainant, the service provider, consumer advocate, or any other interested person directly affected by the proposed decision is dissatisfied with the proposed resolution, a request for formal complaint proceedings may be filed. A request for formal complaint proceedings will be processed by the commission pursuant to rule 199-6.5 (476) et seq. If no request for formal complaint proceedings is received by the commission within 14 days after issuance of the proposed resolution, the proposed resolution will be deemed binding upon all persons notified of the informal proceedings and affected by the proposed resolution. Notwithstanding the binding nature of any proposed resolution as to the affected persons, the commission may at any time and on its own motion initiate formal proceedings that may alter the allocation of liability.
(6) No entity may commence any actions to rebill, directly bill, or otherwise collect any disputed charges for a change in service until after commission action on the complaint is final. If final commission action finds that the change in service was unauthorized and determines the customer should pay some amount less than the billed amount, the service provider is prohibited from rebilling or taking any other steps whatsoever to collect the difference between the allowed charges and the original charges.Iowa Admin. Code r. 199-6.8
Adopted by IAB February 21, 2024/Volume XLVI, Number 17, effective 3/27/2024Editorial change: IAC Supplement 7/24/2024