Debarment and suspension shall be imposed on University contractors only when it is in the best interest of the University and not for punitive purposes and only for the causes set forth in this Section.
The CCO shall utilize the excluded parties list of contractors declared ineligible under federal laws and regulations applicable to the District of Columbia in making contract award decisions.
The CCO shall develop and maintain a current, comprehensive list of all contractors that have been debarred, suspended or declared ineligible.
The CCO shall utilize the federal government consolidated list of debarred, suspended or otherwise ineligible contractors until the University's list is developed.
The consolidated list shall include the following:
The CCO shall not solicit offers from, award contracts to, or consent to subcontract with a debarred or suspended contractor.
A contractor designated as ineligible shall be excluded from receiving contracts and subcontracts under the conditions and for the period set forth in the applicable statute or regulation.
The CCO may continue contracts or subcontracts in existence at the time a contractor is debarred, suspended or determined ineligible, unless the CCO determines in writing that the existing contracts or subcontracts should be terminated to protect the best interests of the University for any of the reasons set forth in these regulations.
The CCO shall not exercise an option to renew or otherwise extend a current contract with a debarred, suspended or otherwise ineligible contractor, unless the CCO approves the action in writing.
In any subcontract requiring University consent, the CCO shall not consent to the award of a subcontract to any debarred, suspended or otherwise ineligible contractor unless the CCO approves the award, in writing, based on compelling reasons in the best interest of the University.
The CCO may debar a contractor for any of the following reasons:
Debarment shall include debarment of all divisions or other organizational elements of the contractor, unless the CCO determines that good cause exists to debar only certain specified organizational units of the contractor.
The CCO may extend the debarment decision to include any affiliates, subsidiaries, or parents of the contractor by specifically naming the affiliate and giving the affiliate written notice of the proposed debarment and an opportunity to respond in accordance with the provisions of this Section.
Debarment shall be for a period not to exceed three (3) years based on the seriousness of the cause(s) of debarment. The debarment period begins on the date the contractor receives the notice of proposed debarment.
If suspension precedes debarment, the suspension period shall be considered in determining the debarment period.
If the CCO decides to impose a debarment, the contractor and any applicable affiliates shall be given prompt notice of the debarment by written notice in a manner determined appropriate by the CCO. The notice shall include the following:
Any contractor intending to appeal the CCO's proposed debarment or suspension shall appeal to the Contracts Review Committee within ten (10) calendar days of receipt of the CCO's decision to debar or suspend the contractor.
The CCO shall submit a report outlining the proposed debarment or suspension action for the review of the Contracts Review Committee. The Contracts Review Committee may hold an informal hearing within ten (10) calendar days of receipt of the contractor's appeal and request for a hearing, unless such time period is extended by the Committee.
The Contracts Review Committee shall issue a final decision within forty-five (45) calendar days after receiving the contractor's appeal. The Contracts Review Committee may issue a decision without a hearing.
Each contractor intending to file an appeal of the Contracts Review Committee's decision shall file an appeal with the District of Columbia Contract Appeals Board (CAB). In order for the CAB to consider the appeal, the contractor shall file the appeal within ten (10) calendar days after the contractor receives a written decision from the Contracts Review Committee.
The contractor shall exhaust all administrative review procedures provided in this Section fully and properly before appealing to the CAB.
The CAB shall have exclusive jurisdiction to hear and decide appeals from written decisions of the Contract Review Committee.
D.C. Mun. Regs. tit. 8, r. 8-B3064