Pursuant to § 10(b) of the Act, the Director shall disqualify for benefits any individual discharged for misconduct occurring in his/her most recent work. The nature of the disqualification shall be in accordance with § 10(b) (1) or § 10(b) (2) of the Act as defined in § 312.3, § 312.4, § 312.5 and § 312.6 of this section.
The party alleging misconduct shall have the responsibility to present evidence sufficient to support a finding of misconduct by the Director.
For purposes of § 10(b) (1) of the Act, the term "gross misconduct" shall mean an act which deliberately or willfully violates the employer's rules, deliberately or willfully threatens or violates the employer's interests, shows a repeated disregard for the employee's obligation to the employer, or disregards standards of behavior which an employer has a right to expect of its employee.
Gross misconduct may include, but is not limited to the following:
For purposes of § 10(b) (2) of the Act, the term "other than gross misconduct" shall mean an act or omission by an employee which constitutes a breach of the employee's duties or obligations to the employer, a breach of the employment agreement or contract, or which adversely affects a material employer interest. The term "other than gross misconduct" shall include those acts where the severity, degree, or other mitigating circumstances do not support a finding of gross misconduct.
Other than gross misconduct may include, but is not limited to the following:
If a violation of the employer's rules is the basis for a disqualification from benefits pursuant to § 10(b) (1) or § 10(b)(2) the Act, the Director shall determine the following:
In an appeal hearing, no misconduct shall be presumed. The absence of facts which affirmatively establish misconduct shall relieve a claimant from offering evidence on the issue of misconduct.
In an appeal hearing, the persons who supplied the answers to questionnaires or issued other statements alleging misconduct shall be present and available for questioning by the adverse party.
In an appeal hearing, prior statements or written documents, in the absence of other reliable corroborating evidence, shall not constitute evidence sufficient to support a finding of misconduct by the Director.
D.C. Mun. Regs. tit. 7, r. 7-312