D.C. Mun. Regs. tit. 1, r. 1-2819

Current through Register Vol. 71, No. 49, December 6, 2024
Rule 1-2819 - SUMMARY ADJUDICATION
2819.1

A party may move for an Administrative Law Judge to decide a case or part of a case summarily, without an evidentiary hearing, by filing a motion for summary adjudication. A motion for summary adjudication that relies on factual assertions shall include a statement of undisputed facts that support the decision requested by the party. A statement of undisputed facts sets forth facts that matter to the case and that the party has reason to believe are not or will not be genuinely disputed by the other party or parties. A motion for summary adjudication may include affidavits, declarations under penalty of perjury, exhibits, and a discussion of controlling legal authority.

2819.2

The party opposing a motion for summary adjudication may file a statement indicating for each fact set forth in the statement of undisputed facts whether the party admits the fact, denies the fact, or does not have sufficient information to admit or deny the fact. The party's opposition to the motion for summary adjudication may also include affidavits, declarations under penalty of perjury, exhibits, and a discussion of controlling legal authority.

2819.3

The Administrative Law Judge may treat as undisputed any facts set forth in the statement of undisputed facts that are not disputed by the opposing party. The Administrative Law Judge may also conduct a hearing on whether facts that matter to the case are genuinely in dispute.

2819.4

If the undisputed facts support the decision requested by the moving party, the Administrative Law Judge may grant a summary adjudication for the moving party.

D.C. Mun. Regs. tit. 1, r. 1-2819

Final Rulemaking published at 51 DCR 6399 (June 25, 2004); as amended by Notice of Final Rulemaking published at 57 DCR 12541, 12555 (December 31, 2010); Final Rulemaking published at 63 DCR 6556 (4/29/2016); amended by Final Rulemaking published at 71 DCR 13913 (12/1/2024)
Authority: The Chief Administrative Law Judge of the Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH), pursuant to the authority set forth in Sections 8(a)(7) and 8(b)(7) of the Office of Administrative Hearings Establishment Act of 2001, effective March 6, 2002 (D.C. Law 14-76, D.C. Official Code §§ 2-1831.05(a)(7) and (b)(7)) .