3.3Performance Evaluation Ratings for Teachers. The following four Performance Evaluation Ratings for teachers must be used statewide: ineffective, partially effective, effective, and highly effective. The Department must develop a scoring method for assigning ratings as a part of the State Model System and must provide guidelines for evaluating teachers who are consistently rated highly effective. School districts and BOCES may use the scoring method developed by the Department or may adopt their own scoring method, provided they ensure that each Performance Evaluation Rating is based thirty percent on Measures of Student Learning and that each of the Teacher Quality Standards (Professional Practice) has a measurable influence on the final Performance Evaluation Rating.
School districts and BOCES must assign one of the Teacher Performance Evaluation Ratings to each teacher in a written evaluation report. As required by section 22-9-106(3), C.R.S., all evaluation reports must contain a written improvement plan, that must be specific as to what improvements, if any, are needed in the performance of the teacher and clearly sets forth recommendations for improvements, including recommendations for additional education and training during the teacher's license renewal process. As required by section 22-9-105.5(3) (a), C.R.S., each teacher must be provided with an opportunity to improve their effectiveness through a teacher development plan that links their evaluation and performance standards to professional development opportunities.
The following status implications apply for each Teacher Performance Evaluation Rating. These status implications do not apply to at-will employees.
3.3 (A)Ineffective.3.3 (A) (1) A teacher whose performance is deemed ineffective must receive written notice that their Performance Evaluation Rating shows a rating of ineffective and includes a copy of the documentation relied upon in measuring their performance and identification of deficiencies.3.3 (A) (2) Implications for earning or losing nonprobationary status: A nonprobationary teacher who is rated ineffective or partially effective for two consecutive years loses nonprobationary status.3.3 (B)Partially Effective.3.3 (B) (1) Implications for earning or losing nonprobationary status: A nonprobationary teacher who is rated partially effective or ineffective for two consecutive years loses nonprobationary status. Nonprobationary status is only lost if the teacher is rated partially effective or ineffective during the year directly after the first rating of partially effective or ineffective.3.3 (C)Effective.3.3 (C) (1) Implications for earning or losing nonprobationary status: A probationary teacher may earn nonprobationary status after a minimum of three consecutive years of earning a rating of effective or highly effective. A nonprobationary teacher must maintain an effective rating to retain nonprobationary status. Two consecutive ratings below effective results in the loss of nonprobationary status.3.3 (D)Highly Effective.3.3 (D) (1) Implications for earning or losing nonprobationary status: For the purposes of gaining or losing nonprobationary status, a rating of highly effective has the same implications as a rating of effective.