A public employee is elected to a position on the date on which the election is held.
A contract is substantially similar to another contract if the two contracts involve the same type of services, goods, benefits (such as insurance coverage), or access to and/or use of premises. Contracts may be substantially similar even though the parties or the contract terms are not the same.
Example: An office furniture company's contract to sell ten desks to state agency A is substantially similar to the company's contract to sell 100 filing cabinets to state agency B, because both contracts involve the sale of office equipment.
Example: The office furniture company's contract to sell 100 filing cabinets to state agency B is not substantially similar to its contract to sell inventory software to state agency C, because the two contracts do not involve the same type of services or goods.
Example: An extermination service company's one-year contract to spray Town Hall for insects is substantially similar to the company's three-year contract to inspect another municipal building for rodents and place glue traps as needed, because the two contracts involve the same type of services.
Contract terms are non-negotiable if the contract is a standard form contract containing only terms and conditions available to any similarly situated public agency, person, or entity, and is not a contract developed for, or containing negotiated terms specific to, a particular transaction between a public agency and the contractor.
Example: A state contract that consists of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Standard Contract Form, Commonwealth Terms and Conditions, and a Statement of Work negotiated between the state agency and the contractor setting forth what the contractor will do and how much it will be paid, contains negotiated terms, and does not satisfy the definition of non-negotiable contract terms.
Example: The owner of a construction company is elected mayor. Prior to his election, his company contracted with the municipality to construct an addition to a municipal office building. The mayor may retain his financial interest in that contract until the term of the contract is completed, because it pre-dates his election as mayor, provided that he makes a disclosure as required by 930 CMR 6.26(6), and complies with the restrictions set forth in 930 CMR 6.26(7). The mayor may retain his financial interest in the contract if a change order is executed authorizing the company to buy more pipe than was originally anticipated based upon the unit price for pipe agreed to in the original contract, but he would not be able to retain his financial interest in the contract if a change order were executed involving payment of a negotiated lump sum amount for specified additional work. The mayor may have a financial interest in a new or amended municipal contract entered into after his election only if he can satisfy the requirements of 930 CMR 6.26(5) or some other exemption to M.G.L. c. 268A, § 20.
Example: A software company has a contract with a state agency to develop software. The term of the contract is six months. An owner of the software company is hired by a state agency during the term of the contract. The new state employee may retain his financial interest in that contract until its term is completed, because it pre-dates his appointment to his new position, provided that he makes a disclosure as required by 930 CMR 6.26(6), and complies with the restrictions set forth in 930 CMR 6.26(7). He may have a financial interest in a new or amended state contract entered into after his appointment only if he can satisfy the requirements of 930 CMR 6.26(5) or some other exemption to M.G.L. c. 268A, § 7.
Example: The owner of a construction company is elected to a board of selectmen. He used the exemption set forth in 930 CMR 6.26(3) to retain a pre-existing financial interest in a municipal contract to construct an addition to a building. The municipality is preparing to award a contract for construction of a new school by making a public announcement soliciting bids, and will award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder. The two contracts are substantially similar, and the contract will be awarded pursuant to a competitive bidding process, as defined by M.G.L. c. 268A, § 1(b), so the requirements of 930 CMR 6.26(5)(a) and (b)1. are satisfied. If the selectman can also meet the requirements of 930 CMR 6.26(5)(c), (d), and (e), then he may use the exemption set forth in 930 CMR 6.26(5) to have a financial interest in the new contract.
Example: A commercial fisherman is elected to his town's board of selectmen. Prior to his election, he leased a municipal boat berth from the town to conduct his business. Subsequent to his election, he has used the exemption set forth in 930 CMR 6.26(3) to retain his financial interest in that contract. He wishes to lease an additional boat berth from the town to expand his fishing operations. The town does not use a competitive bidding process to assign boat berths, but rather requires persons seeking boat berths to submit an application. The town maintains a waiting list of applicants. Applicants who are selected in accordance with the town's process must pay rent according to a set fee schedule. The new contract meets all of the requirements of 930 CMR 6.26(5)(a), (b)2., and (c). The selectman may use the exemption set forth in 930 CMR 6.26(5) provided that he also satisfies the requirements of 930 CMR 6.26(d) and (e).
Example: An owner of a software company has been hired by a state agency and has used the exemption set forth in 930 CMR 6.26(3) to retain a pre-existing financial interest in a state contract. His employing agency is preparing to award a contract for software pursuant to a competitive bidding process. The state employee cannot have a financial interest in that contract, because the contract is with his own agency. He could only have a financial interest in a new state contract if he met all the requirements of 930 CMR 6.26(5).
930 CMR, § 6.26