Section 52h.11 - What are the review criteria for contract projects and proposals?(a) In carrying out its review of a project concept under § 52h.10(a) or § 52h.10(b), the peer review group shall take into account, among other pertinent factors:(1) The significance from a scientific or technical standpoint of the goals of the proposed research or development activity;(2) The availability of the technology and other resources necessary to achieve those goals;(3) The extent to which there are identified, practical uses for the anticipated results of the activity; and(4) Where the review includes the project approach, the adequacy of the methodology to be utilized in carrying out the activity.(b) In carrying out its review of unsolicited contract proposals under § 52h.9, the peer review group shall take into account, among other pertinent factors, the criteria in § 52h.8 which are relevant to the particular proposals.(c) In carrying out its review of solicited proposals under § 52h.10(a) or (b), the peer review group shall evaluate each proposal in accordance with the criteria set forth in the request for proposals.