40 C.F.R. § 63.1662-63 app Table 4 to Subpart LLLLL of Part 63
Current through November 30, 2024
| For- | For the following emission limitation- | You have demonstrated initial compliance if- |
| 1. Each blowing still, Group 1 asphalt loading rack, and Group 1 asphalt storage tank, at existing, new, and reconstructed asphalt processing facilities | a. Reduce total hydrocarbon mass emissions by 95 percent or to a concentration of 20 ppmv, on a dry basis corrected to 3 percent oxygen | i. The total hydrocarbon emissions, determined using the equations in § 63.8687 and the test methods and procedures in Table 3 to this subpart, over the period of the performance test are reduced by at least 95 percent by weight or to a concentration of 20 ppmv, on a dry basis corrected to 3 percent oxygen; and ii. You have a record of the average control device operating parametersa over the performance test during which emissions were reduced according to 1.a.i. of this table. |
| b. Route the emissions to a combustion device achieving a combustion efficiency of 99.5 percent | i. The combustion efficiency of the combustion device, determined using the equations in § 63.8687 and the test methods and procedures in Table 3 to this subpart, over the period of the performance test is at least 99.5 percent; and ii. You have a record of the average combustion zone temperaturea and carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and total hydrocarbon outlet concentrations over the performance test during which the combustion efficiency was at least 99.5 percent. | |
| c. Route the emissions to a combustion device that does not use auxiliary fuel achieving a THC destruction efficiency of 95.8 percent | i. The THC destruction efficiency of the combustion device, determined using the equations in § 63.8687 and the test methods and procedures in Table 3 to this subpart, over the period of the performance test is at least 95.8 percent; and ii. You have a record of the average combustion zone temperaturea and carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and total hydrocarbon outlet concentrations over the performance test during which the THC destruction efficiency was at least 95.8 percent. | |
| d. Route emissions to a boiler or process heater with a design heat input capacity of 44 MW or greater | You have a record of the boiler or process heater design heat capacity. | |
| e. Introduce the emissions into the flame zone of a boiler or process heater | You have a record that shows the emissions are being introduced into the boiler or process heater flame zone. | |
| f. Route emissions to a flare meeting the requirements of § 63.11(b) | You have a record of the flare design and operating requirements. | |
| 2. Each coating mixer, saturator (including wet looper), coater, sealant applicator, adhesive applicator, and Group 1 asphalt storage tank at new and reconstructed asphalt roofing manufacturing lines | a. Reduce total hydrocarbon mass emissions by 95 percent or to a concentration of 20 ppmv, on a dry basis corrected to 3 percent oxygen | See 1.a.i. and ii. of this table. |
| b. Route the emissions to a combustion device achieving a combustion efficiency of 99.5 percent | See 1.b.i. and ii. of this table. | |
| c. Route the emissions to a combustion device that does not use auxiliary fuel achieving a THC destruction efficiency of 95.8 percent | See 1.c.i. and ii. of this table. | |
| d. Route emissions to a boiler or process heater with a design heat input capacity of 44 MW or greater | See 1.d. of this table. | |
| e. Introduce the emissions into the flame zone of a boiler or process heater | See 1.e. of this table. | |
| f. Route emissions to a flare meeting the requirements of § 63.11(b) | See 1.f. of this table. | |
| 3. The total emissions from the coating mixer, saturator (including wet looper), coater, sealant applicator, and adhesive applicator at each existing asphalt roofing manufacturing line | a. Limit PM emissions to 0.04 kg/Mg (0.08 lb/ton) of asphalt shingle or mineral-surfaced roll roofing produced | i. The PM emissions, determined using the equations in § 63.8687 and the test methods and procedures in Table 3 to this subpart, over the period of the performance test are no greater than the applicable emission limitation; and ii. You have a record of the average control devicea or process parameters over the performance test during which the particulate matter emissions were no greater than the applicable emission limitation. |
| b. Limit PM emissions to 0.4 kg/Mg (0.8 lb/ton) of saturated felt or smooth-surfaced roll roofing produced | See 3.a.i. and ii. of this table. | |
| 4. Each saturator (including wet looper) and coater at an existing, new, or reconstructed asphalt roofing manufacturing line | a. Limit visible emissions from the emissions capture system to 20 percent of any period of consecutive valid observations totaling 60 minutes | The visible emissions, measured using EPA test method 22 in appendix A to part 60 of this chapter, for any period of consecutive valid observations totaling 60 minutes do not exceed 20 percent. |
| b. Limit opacity emissions to 20 percent | The opacity, measured using EPA test method 9 in appendix A to part 60 of this chapter, for each of the first 30 6-minute averages does not exceed 20 percent. | |
| 5. Each Group 2 asphalt storage tank at existing, new, and reconstructed asphalt processing facilities and asphalt roofing manufacturing lines | Limit exhaust gases to 0 percent opacity | The opacity, measured using EPA test method 9 in appendix A to part 60 of this chapter, for each of the first 30 6-minute averages does not exceed 0 percent. |
a If you use a CEMS or COMS to demonstrate compliance with the emission limits, you are not required to record control device operating parameters.
40 C.F.R. 63.1662-63 app Table 4 to Subpart LLLLL of Part 63