Cal. Code Regs. tit. 10 § 2232.56

Current through Register 2024 Notice Reg. No. 50, December 13, 2024
Section 2232.56 - Effect on Benefits
(a) This provision shall apply in determining the benefits as to a person covered under this Plan for any Claim Determination Period if, for the Allowable Expenses incurred as to such person during such period, the sum of
(1) the benefits that would be payable under this Plan in the absence of this provision, and
(2) the benefits that would be payable under all other Plans in the absence therein of provisions of similar purpose to this provision would exceed such Allowable Expenses.
(b) As to any Claim Determination Period with respect to which this provision is applicable, the benefits that would be payable under this Plan in the absence of this provision for the Allowable Expenses incurred as to such person during such Claim Determination Period shall be reduced to the extent necessary so that the sum of such reduced benefits and all the benefits payable for such Allowable Expenses under all other Plans, except as provided in paragraph (c) below, shall not exceed the total of such Allowable Expenses. Benefits payable under another Plan include the benefits that would have been payable had claim been duly made therefor.
(c) If
(1) another Plan which is involved in paragraph (b) above and which contains a provision coordinating its benefits with those this Plan would, according to its rules, determine its benefits after the benefits of this Plan have been determined, and
(2) the rules set forth in paragraph (d) below would require this Plan to determine its benefits before such other Plan, then the benefits of such other Plan will be ignored for the purposes of determining the benefits under this Plan.
(d) For the purposes of paragraph (c) above, the rules establishing the order of benefit determination are:
(1) The benefits of a Plan which covers the person on whose expenses claim is based other than as a dependent shall be determined before the benefits of a Plan which covers such person as a dependent.
(2) Except for cases of a person for whom claim is made as a dependent child whose parents are separated or divorced, the benefits of a plan which covers the person on whose expenses claim is based as a dependent of a person whose date of birth, excluding year of birth, occurs earlier in a calendar year, shall be determined before the benefits of a Plan which covers such person as a dependent of a person whose date of birth, excluding year of birth, occurs later in a calendar year. If either Plan does not have the provisions of this paragraph regarding dependents, which results either in each Plan determining its benefits before the other or in each Plan determining its benefits after the other, the provisions of this paragraph shall not apply, and the rule set forth in the Plan which does not have the provisions of this paragraph shall determine the order of benefits.
(3) In the case of a person for whom claim is made as a dependent child whose parents are separated or divorced and the parent with custody of the child has not remarried, the benefits of a Plan which covers the child as a dependent of the parent with custody of the child will be determined before the benefits of a plan which covers the child as a dependent of the parent without custody.
(4) In the case of a person for whom claim is made as a dependent child whose parents are divorced and the parent with custody of the child has remarried, the benefits of a Plan which covers the child as a dependent of the parent with custody shall be determined before the benefits of a Plan which covers that child as a dependent of the stepparent, and the benefits of a Plan which covers that child as a dependent of the stepparent will be determined before the benefits of a Plan which covers that child as a dependent of the parent without custody.
(5) In the case of a person for whom claim is made as a dependent child whose parents are separated or divorced, where there is a court decree which would otherwise establish financial responsibility for the medical, dental or other health care expenses with respect to the child, then, notwithstanding paragraphs (3) and (4) above, the benefits of a Plan which covers the child as a dependent of the parent with such financial responsibility shall be determined before the benefits of any other Plan which covers the child as a dependent child.
(6) When rules (1) through (5) do not establish an order of benefit determination, the benefits of a Plan which has covered the person on whose expenses claim is based for the longer period of time shall be determined before the benefits of a Plan which has covered such person the shorter period of time, provided that:
(A) the benefits of a plan covering the person on whose expenses claim is based as a laid-off or retired employee, or dependent of such person, shall be determined after the benefits of any other Plan covering such person as an employee, other than a laid-off or retired employee, or dependent of such person; and
(B) if either Plan does not have a provision regarding laid-off or retired employees, which results in each Plan determining its benefits after the other, then the provisions of (A) above shall not apply.
(e) When this provision operates to reduce the total amount of benefits otherwise payable as to a person covered under this Plan during any Claim Determination Period, each benefit that would be payable in the absence of this provision shall be reduced proportionately, and such reduced amount shall be charged against any applicable benefit limit of this Plan.

Instructions

(a) When a claim under a Plan with a COB provision involves another Plan which also has a COB provision, the carriers involved shall use the above rules to decide the order in the which the benefits payable under the respective plans will be determined.
(b) In determining the length of time an individual has been covered under a given Plan, two successive Plans of a given group shall be deemed to be one continuous Plan so long as the claimant concerned was eligible for coverage within 24 hours after the prior Plan terminated. Thus, neither a change in the amount or scope of benefits provided by a Plan, a change in the carrier insuring the Plan, nor a change from one type of Plan to another, (e.g. single employer to multiple employer Plan, or vice versa, or single employer to a Taft-Hartley Welfare Plan) would constitute the start of a new Plan for purposes of this instruction.
(c) If a claimant's effective date of coverage under a given Plan is subsequent to the date the carrier first contracted to provide the Plan for the group concerned (employer, union, association, etc.), then, in the absence of specific information to the contrary, the carrier shall assume, for purposes of this instruction, that the claimant's length of time covered under that Plan shall be measured from claimant's effective date of coverage. If a claimant's effective date of coverage under a given Plan is the same as the date the carrier first contracted to provide the Plan for the group concerned, then the carrier shall request the group concerned to furnish the date the claimant first became covered under the earliest of any prior Plans the group may have had. If such date is not readily available, the date the claimant first became a member of the group shall be used as the date from which to determine the length of time the claimant's coverage under that Plan has been in force.
(d) It is recognized that there may be existing group plans containing provisions under which the coverage is declared to be "excess" to all other coverages, or other overinsurance provisions not consistent with the provisions of these regulations. Such plans may have been written by certain self-insured or non-regulated entities not presently subject to insurance regulation, or by insurers or service corporations under policies or contracts issued prior to the effective date of these regulations, and which have not yet been brought into conformance with these regulations. In such cases, carriers are urged to use the following claims administration procedures: A group contract should pay first if it would be primary under the COB order of benefit determination. In those cases in which it would normally be considered secondary, the carrier should make every effort to coordinate in the secondary position with benefits available through such "excess" plans. The carrier should try to secure the necessary information from the "excess" plan.
(e) Provision (c) may be omitted if the plan provides only one benefit.
(f) A group contract which includes COB and which is issued or renewed, or which has an anniversary date on or after the effective date of this section as amended in 1986 shall include the substance of the provision in subsection (c) (2) of this section. That provision shall become effective, at the option of the insurer, on January 1, 1987, or one year after the effective date of this section as amended in 1986. Until that provision becomes effective, the group contract shall, instead, use wording like this:
(2)" Except as stated in paragraphs (3), (4) and (5), below, the benefits of a Plan which covers a person as a dependent of a male are determined before those of a Plan which covers the person as a dependent of a female."

Cal. Code Regs. Tit. 10, § 2232.56

1. Amendment filed 1-8-86; effective thirtieth day thereafter (Register 86, No. 2).
2. Editorial correction of printing error in subsection (d)(1) (Register 93, No. 32).
3. Change without regulatory effect amending provision (c) of instructions filed 7-14-2021 pursuant to section 100, title 1, California Code of Regulations (Register 2021, No. 29). Filing deadline specified in Government Code section 11349.3(a) extended 60 calendar days pursuant to Executive Order N-40-20.

Note: Authority cited: Sections 10270.94, 10270.98, 11515 and 11515.5, Insurance Code. Reference: Sections 10270.98 and 11515.5, Insurance Code.

1. Amendment filed 1-8-86; effective thirtieth day thereafter (Register 86, No. 2).
2. Editorial correction of printing error in subsection (d)(1) (Register 93, No. 32).
3. Change without regulatory effect amending provision (c) of instructions filed 7-14-2021 pursuant to section 100, title 1, California Code of Regulations (Register 2021, No. 29). Filing deadline specified in Government Code section 11349.3(a) extended 60 calendar days pursuant to Executive Order N-40-20.