Ariz. Admin. Code § 19-2-405

Current through Register Vol. 30, No. 45, November 8, 2024

Section R19-2-405 - Contracts and Agreements

An ADWP shall submit the following information regarding any group, concession, or contract related to the ADW operation whether within or outside of Arizona:

1. Copy of all contracts to provide services, including totalisator vendor services, within or on behalf of Arizona racetrack permittees or residents;

2. Name and background of the individuals responsible for operating the ADW accounts system;

3. Other information that, in the Director's judgment, is or may be material, such as information pertaining to financial background and persons associated with the parties to the contract;

4. Security measures to be employed to protect the ADWP account maintenance and wagering facilities;

5. Security measures to be employed to protect transmission of sales transaction and pari-mutuel output data;

6. Type of data processing, communication, and transmission equipment to be used;

7. Description of all computer services and all other methods used to transmit any data or signal; and

8. Description of any alternate or backup system in case of principal system failure of communications or data-processing equipment used for forwarding wagers.

Ariz. Admin. Code § R19-2-405

Adopted effective April 3, 1984 (Supp. 84-2). Amended effective August 21, 1985 (Supp. 85-4). Repealed effective December 14, 1994 (Supp. 94-4). R19-2-405 recodified from R4-27-405 (Supp. 95-1). New Section adopted effective February 26, 1996, pursuant to an exemption from the rulemaking process (Supp. 96-1). New Section made by exempt rulemaking at 20 A.A.R. 2874, effective 10/10/2014.

Section R19-2-405 was adopted under an exemption from the provisions of the Arizona Administrative Procedure Act pursuant to A.R.S. § 41-105(A)(18). Exemption from the rulemaking process means that the agency did not submit these rules to the Secretary of State's Office for publication in the Register as proposed rules, the agency was not required to accept public comment, and the rules were not approved by either the Governor's Regulatory Review Council or the Attorney General.