EXAMPLE: The taxpayer rents a 10-story building at an annual rental rate of $1,000,000. Taxpayer occupies two stories and sublets eight stories for $1,000,000 a year. The net annual rental rate of the taxpayer must not be less than two-tenths of the taxpayer's annual rental rate for the entire year, or $200,000.
EXAMPLE: A taxpayer using the percentage of completion method of accounting for long-term contracts, entered into a long-term contract to build a structure for $9,000,000. The contract allowed three years for completion and, as of the end of the second income year, the taxpayer's books of account, kept on the accrual method, disclosed the following:
Receipts Expenditures
End of 1st income year $2,500,000 $2,400,000
End of 2nd income year 4,500,000 4,100,000
Totals $6,500,000 $7,000,000
In computing the above expenditures, consideration was given to material and supplies on hand at the beginning and end of each income year. It was estimated that the contract was 30% completed at the end of the first income year and 80% completed at the end of the second income year. The amount to be included as business income for the first income year is $300,000 (30% of $9,000,000 or $2,700,000 less expenditures of $2,400,000 equals $300,000). The amount to be included as business income for the second income year is $400,000 (50% of $9,000,000 or $4,500,000 less expenditures of $4,100,000 equals $400,000).
EXAMPLE 1: Taxpayer commenced a long-term construction project in this state as of the beginning of a given year. By the end of its second year, its equity in the costs of production to be reflected in the numerator and denominator of its property factor for such year is computed as follows:
1st Year Beginning Ending 2nd Year Beginning Ending
Construction Costs ...... 0 $1,000,000
Progress Billings ....... 600,000
Balance 12/31 - (1/1) ... $400,000 $400,000
Construction Costs: Total from beginning of Project ... $5,000,000
Progress billings: Total from beginning of Project .... 4,000,000
Balance 12/31 ......................................... 1,000,000
Balance beginning of Year ............................. 400,000
Total ................................................. $1,400,000
Average (1\2) - Value used in property factor $700,000
Note: It may be necessary to use monthly averages if yearly averages do not properly reflect the average value of the taxpayer's equity; see Section 40-27-1, Article IV.12 and Regulation 810-27-1-4-.12.
EXAMPLE 2: Same facts as in EXAMPLE 1, except that progress billings exceeded construction costs. No value for the taxpayer's equity in the construction project is shown in the property factor.
EXAMPLE: A taxpayer engaged in a long-term contract in state X sends several key employees to that state to supervise the project. The taxpayer, for unemployment tax purposes, reports these employees to state Y where the main office is maintained and where the employees reside. For payroll factor purposes and in accordance with Section 40-27-1, Article IV.14 and Regulation 810-27-1-4-.14 thereunder, the compensation is assigned to the numerator of state X.
EXAMPLE 1: A construction project was undertaken in this state by a calendar year taxpayer which had elected one of the long-term contract methods of accounting. The following gross receipts (progress billings) were derived from the contract during the three income years that the contract was in progress.
1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year
Gross Receipts $1,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000
The gross receipts to be reflected in both the numerator and denominator of the sales factor for each of the three years are the amounts shown.
EXAMPLE 2: A taxpayer contracts to build a dam on a river at a point which lies half within this state and half within state X. During the taxpayer's first income year, construction costs in this state were $2,000,000. Total construction costs for the project during the income year were $3,000,000. Gross receipts (progress billings) for the year were $2,400,000. Accordingly, gross receipts of $1,600,000 ($2,000,000/$3,000,000 x $2,400,000) are included in the numerator of the sales factor.
EXAMPLE 3: A taxpayer which had elected the percentage of completion method of accounting entered into a long-term construction contract. At the end of its current income year (the second since starting the project), it estimated that the project was 30% completed. The bid price for the project was $9,000,000 and it had received $2,500,000 from progress billings as of the end of its current income year. The amount of gross receipts to be included in the sales factor for the current income year is $2,700,000 (30% of $9,000,000), regardless of whether the taxpayer uses the accrual method or the cash method of accounting for receipts and disbursements.
EXAMPLE 4: A taxpayer which had elected the completed contract method of accounting entered into a long-term construction contract. By the end of its current income year (the second since starting the project), it had billed and had accrued on its books a total of $5,000,000 of which $2,000,000 had accrued in the first year in which the contract was undertaken and $3,000,000 had accrued in the current (second) year. The amount of gross receipts to be included in the sales factor for the current income year is $3,000,000.
EXAMPLE 5: Same facts as in EXAMPLE 4 except that the taxpayer keeps its books on the cash basis and, as of the end of its current income year, had received only $2,500,000 of the $3,000,000 billed during the current year. The amount of gross receipts to be included in the sales factor for the current income year is $2,500,000.
EXAMPLE 1: A taxpayer using the completed contract method of accounting for long-term contracts is engaged in three long-term contracts; Contract L in this state, Contract M in state X and Contract N in state Y. In addition, it has other business income (less expenses) during the income year 1972 from interests, rents and short-term contracts amounting to $500,000, and nonbusiness income allocable to this state of $8,000. During 1972, it completed Contract M in state X at a profit of $900,000. Contracts L and N in this state and state Y, respectively, were not completed during the income year. The apportionment percentages of the taxpayer as determined in(paragraph (4)(d)5.(iv)(V) of this regulation and the percentages of contracts costs as determined in paragraph (4)(f)2. above for each year during which Contract M in state X was in progress as follows:
1970 1971 1972
Apportionment percentages 30.0% 20.0% 40.0%
Percentages of Construction Costs of Contract M each year to total construction costs - (100%) 20.0% 50.0% 30.0%
The corporation's net income subject to tax in this state for 1972 is computed as follows:
Business Income $500,000
Apportion 40% to this state $200,000
Add: Income from Contract M* $252,000
Total business income derived from sources within this state 452,000
Add: Nonbusiness income allocated to this state 8,000
Net income subject to tax in this state $460,000
* Income from Contract M apportioned to this state:
1970 1971 1972 Total
Apportionment percentage 30.0% 20.0% 40.0%
Percent of Construction Costs 20.0% 50.0% 30.0% 100.0%
Product 6.0% 10.0% 12.0% 28.0%
28.0% of $900,000 = $252,000
EXAMPLE 2: Same facts as in EXAMPLE 1 except that Contract L was started in 1972 in this state, the first year in which the taxpayer was subject to tax in this state. Contract L in this state and Contract N in state Y are incomplete in 1972.
The corporation's net income subject to tax in this state for 1972 is computed as follows:
Business Income $500,000
Apportion 40% to this state $200,000
Add: Income from Contract M* 108,000
Total business income derived from sources within this state $308,000
Add: Nonbusiness income allocated to this state 8,000
Net income subject to tax in this state $316,000
* Income from Contract M apportioned to this state:
1970 1971 1972 Total
Apportionment percentage 0.0% 0.0% 40.0%
Percent of Construction Costs 20.0% 50.0% 30.0% 100.0%
Product 0.0% 0.0% 12.0% 12.0%
12.0% of $900,000 = $108,000.
Note: Only 12% is used to determine the income derived from sources within this state since the corporation was not subject to tax in this state prior to 1972.
EXAMPLE 3: Same facts as in example 1 except that the figures relate to Contract L in this state and 1972 is the first year the corporation was taxable in another state (see Section 40-27-1, Articles IV.2 and IV.3 and Regulations 810-27-1-4-.02(b)(1) and 810-27-1-4-.03. Contracts M and N in states X and Y were started in 1972 and are incomplete.
The corporation's net income subject to tax in this state for 1972 is computed as follows:
Business Income $500,000
Apportion 40% to this state $200,000
Add: Income from Contract L* $738,000
Total business income derived from sources within this state $938,000
Add: Nonbusiness income allocated to this state 8,000
Net income subject to tax in this state $946,000
* Income from Contract L apportioned to this state:
1970 1971 1972 Total
Apportionment percentage 100.0% 100.0% 40.0%
Percentage of Construction Costs 20.0% 50.0% 30.0% 100.0%
Product 20.0% 50.0% 12.0% 82.0%
82.0% of $900,000 = $738,000.
EXAMPLE: A construction contractor qualified to do business in this state had elected the completed contract method of accounting for long-term contracts. It was engaged in two long-term contracts. Contract L in this state was started in 1971 and completed at a profit of $900,000 on 12/16/73. The taxpayer withdrew on 12/31/73. Contract M in state X was started in 1972 and was incomplete on 12/31/73. The apportionment percentages of the taxpayer, as determined at paragraph (4)(d) of this regulation, and percentages of construction costs, as determined in paragraph (4)(f)2. of this regulation, for each year during which Contract M in state X was in progress are as follows:
1971 1972 1973 Total
Apportionment percentages 30.0% 20.0% 40.0%
Percentages of Construction Costs:
Contract L, this state 20.0% 50.0% 30.0% 100.0%
Contract M, state X 0.0% 10.0% 25.0% 35.0%
The corporation had other business income (net of expenses) of $500,000 during 1972 and $300,000 during 1973. The gross contract price of Contract M (state X) was $1,000,000, and it was estimated to be 35% completed on 12/31/73. Total expenditures to date for Contract M (state X) were $300,000 for the period ended 12/31/73.
The measure of tax for the taxable year ended 12/31/73 is computed as follows:
Taxable Year 1973
Income Year 1972 Income Year 1973
Business Income $500,000 300,000
Apportionment % to this state 20% 40%
Amount Apportioned to this state 100,000 120,000
Add: Income from contracts:
L (this state) * 252,000
M (state X) ** 6,000
Total business income derived from sources within this state $100,000 $378,000
* Income from Contract L apportioned to this state:
1971 1972 1973 Total
Apportionment percentage 30.0% 20.0% 40.0%
Percentage of Construction Costs 20.0% 50.0% 30.0% 100.0%
Product 6.0% 10.0% 12.0% 28.0%
28.0% of $900,000 = $252,000.
** Income from Contract M apportioned to this state:
1971 1972 1973 Total
Apportionment percentage 0.0% 20.0% 40.0%
Percentage of Construction Costs 0.0% 10.0% 25.0% 35.0%
Product 0.0% 2.0% 10.0% 12.0%
12.0% of 50,000*** = $6,000
*** Computation of apportionable income from Contract M based on percentage of completion method:
Total Contract Price $1,000,000
Estimated to be 35% completed $350,000
Less: total expenditures to date 300,000
Apportionable income $50,000
EXAMPLE 1: Assume the following facts for an airline for a tax year:
Flight personnel $60,000,000
Nonflight personnel (n.p.) 40,000,000
Total $100,000,000
The airline's business income apportioned to Alabama would be determined as follows:
Within AL Everywhere
Property Factor:
747s (.10 x $432,000,000) 43,200,000 432,000,000
727s (.20 x $400,000,000) 80,000,000 400,000,000
n.t.p. (.05 x $200,000,000) 10,000,000 200,000,000
133,200,000 1,032,000,000 12.9070%
Sales Factor:
747s (.10 x $432,000,000) 43,200,000 432,000,000
727s (.20 x $400,000,000) 80,000,000 400,000,000
123,200,000 832,000,000 14.8077%
Payroll Factor:
Flight personnel (.148077 x 60,000,000) 8,884,620 60,000,000
Nonflight personnel (n.p.) 6,000,000 40,000,000
14,884,620 100,000,000 14.8846%
Total of factor ratios 42.5993%
+ 3
Alabama apportionment ratio 14.1998%
Business income $1,000,000
Amount apportioned to Alabama (.141998 x $1,000,000) $141,998
EXAMPLE 2: Same facts except that paragraph 6 is changed to read:
The airline's business income apportioned to Alabama would be determined as follows:
Within AL Everywhere
Property Factor:
747s (.06 x $432,000,000) 25,920,000 432,000,000
727s (.31 x $400,000,000) 124,000,000 400,000,000
n.t.p. (.03 x $200,000,000) 6,000,000 200,000,000
155,920,000 1,032,000,000 15.1085%
Sales Factor:
747s (.06 x $432,000,000) 25,920,000 432,000,000
727s (.31 x $400,000,000) 124,000,000 400,000,000
149,920,000 832,000,000 18.0192%
Payroll Factor:
Flight personnel (.180192 x 60,000,000) 10,812,520 60,000,000
Nonflight personnel (n.p.) 2,800,000 40,000,000
13,611,520 100,000,000 13.6115%
Total of factor ratios 46.7392%
+ 3
Alabama apportionment ratio 15.5797%
Business income $1,000,000
Amount apportionment to Alabama (.155797 x $1,000,000) $155,797
EXAMPLE: XYZ Television Co. has a total value of all of its property everywhere of $500,000,000, including a satellite valued at $50,000,000 that was used to telecast programming into this state and $150,000,000 in film property of which $1,000,000's worth was located in this state the entire year. The total value of real and tangible personal property, other than film programming property, located in this state for the entire income year was valued at $2,000,000; and the movable and mobile property described in paragraph (8)(d)2.(iii)(I) was determined to be of a value of $4,000,000 and such movable and mobile property was used in this state for 100 days. The total value of property to be attributed to this state would be determined as follows:
Value of property permanently in state: $2,000,000
Value of mobile and movable property: (100/365 or .273973 x $4,000,000): $1,095,892
Total value of property to be included in the state's property factor numerator
(outer-jurisdictional and film property excluded): $3,095,892
Total value of property to be used in the denominator ($500,000,000-$200,000,000) $300,000,000
Total property factor percentage ($3,095,892 / $300,000,000): 1.0320%
EXAMPLE: One example of the use of outer-jurisdictional property is where the taxpayer either owns its own communications satellite or leases the use of uplinks, downlinks or circuits or time on a communications satellite for the purpose of sending messages to its newspaper printing facilities or employees in a state. The state or states in which any printing facility that receives the satellite communications is located and the state from which the communications were sent would, under this regulation, apportion the cost of the owned or rented satellite to their respective property factors based upon the ratio of the in-state use of said satellite to its total usage everywhere.
Assume that ABC Newspaper Co. owns a total of $400,000,000 of property everywhere and that, in addition, it owns and operates a communication satellite for the purpose of sending news articles to its printing plant in this state, as well as for communicating with its printing plants and facilities or news bureaus, employees and agents located in other states and throughout the world. Also assume that the total value of its real and tangible personal property that was permanently located in this state for the entire income year was valued at $3,000,000. Assume also that the total original cost of the satellite is $100,000,000 for the tax period and that of the 10,000 uplinks and downlinks of satellite transmissions used by the taxpayer during the tax period, 200 or 2% are attributable to its satellite communications received in and sent from this state. Assume further that the company's mobile property that was used partially within this state, consisting of 40 delivery trucks, were determined to have an original cost of $4,000,000 and such mobile property was used in this state for 95 days. The total value of property to be attributed to this state would be determined as follows:
Value of property permanently in state: $3,000,000
Value of mobile property: (95/365 or .260274 x $4,000,000): 1,041,096
Value of leased satellite property used in-state: (.02 x $100,000,000): 2,000,000
Total value of property attributable to state: $6,041,096
Total property factor percentage: ($6,041,096 / $500,000,000): 1.2082%
Authors: Verlon Frost, Jeff Taylor
Ala. Admin. Code r. 810-27-1-4-.18
Statutory Authority:Code of Ala. 1975, §§ 40-2A-7(a)(5), 40-18-57.