Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to the Army Corps of Engineers Baker Bay Pile Dike Repair Project

Download PDF
Federal RegisterSep 30, 2024
89 Fed. Reg. 79557 (Sep. 30, 2024)
Document Headings

Document headings vary by document type but may contain the following:

  • the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
  • the number of the CFR title and the number of each part the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly related to
  • the agency docket number / agency internal file number
  • the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions
  • See the Document Drafting Handbook for more details.

    Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  • [RTID 0648-XE225]
  • AGENCY:

    National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

    ACTION:

    Notice; issuance of an incidental harassment authorization.

    SUMMARY:

    In accordance with the regulations implementing the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) as amended, notification is hereby given that NMFS has issued an incidental harassment authorization (IHA) to the Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) to incidentally harass marine mammals during construction activities associated with the Baker Bay pile dike repair project in Baker Bay, Oregon. There are no changes from the proposed authorization in this final authorization.

    DATES:

    This authorization is effective from August 1, 2025 to July 31, 2026.

    ADDRESSES:

    Electronic copies of the application and supporting documents, as well as a list of the references cited in this document, may be obtained online at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/action/incidental-take-authorization-army-corps-engineers-baker-bay-pile-dike-repair-project-baker. In case of problems accessing these documents, please call the contact listed below.

    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

    Craig Cockrell, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, (301) 427-8401.

    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Background

    The MMPA prohibits the “take” of marine mammals, with certain exceptions. Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct the Secretary of Commerce (as delegated to NMFS) to allow, upon request, the incidental, but not intentional, taking of small numbers of marine mammals by U.S. citizens who engage in a specified activity (other than commercial fishing) within a specified geographical region if certain findings are made and either regulations are proposed or, if the taking is limited to harassment, a notice of a proposed IHA is provided to the public for review.

    Authorization for incidental takings shall be granted if NMFS finds that the taking will have a negligible impact on the species or stock(s) and will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the availability of the species or stock(s) for taking for subsistence uses (where relevant). Further, NMFS must prescribe the permissible methods of taking and other “means of effecting the least practicable adverse impact” on the affected species or stocks and their habitat, paying particular attention to rookeries, mating grounds, and areas of similar significance, and on the availability of the species or stocks for taking for certain subsistence uses (referred to in shorthand as “mitigation”); and requirements pertaining to the monitoring and reporting of the takings. The definitions of all applicable MMPA statutory terms cited above are included in the relevant sections below.

    Summary of Request

    On September 8, 2022, NMFS received a request from the ACOE for an IHA to take marine mammals incidental to pile driving and removal at the mouth of the Columbia River in Oregon. Following NMFS' review of the application, the ACOE submitted two revised versions on March 4, 2024 and May 1, 2024. The application was deemed adequate and complete on June 10, 2024. The ACOE's request is for take of eight species of marine mammals by Level B harassment and, for harbor seal ( Phoca vitulina), Level A harassment. Neither ACOE nor NMFS expect serious injury or mortality to result from this activity and, therefore, an IHA is appropriate.

    Description of Activity

    ACOE is planning to conduct pile dike repairs in the Baker Bay system, located in the Columbia River estuary. There are a variety of activities that will occur during this project. Take of marine mammals is expected to occur only during the construction of the material offload facility and the installation of the marker piles. Vibratory and impact pile driving will introduce underwater sounds that may result in take, by Level A and Level B harassment, of marine mammals. It is expected to take up to 12 non-consecutive days to complete the pile driving activities from August through October.

    A detailed description of the planned construction project is provided in the Federal Register notice for the proposed IHA (89 FR 60385, July 25, 2024). Since that time, no changes have been made to the planned activities. Therefore, a detailed description is not provided here. Please refer to that Federal Register notice for the description of the specific activity.

    Comments and Responses

    A notice of NMFS' proposal to issue an IHA to the ACOE was published in the Federal Register on July 25, 2024 (89 FR 60385). That notice described, in detail, the ACOE's activity, the marine mammal species that may be affected by the activity, and the anticipated effects on marine mammals. In that notice, we requested public input on the request for authorization described therein, our analyses, the proposed authorization, and any other aspect of the notice of proposed IHA, and requested that interested persons submit relevant information, suggestions, and comments. During the 30-day public comment period, NMFS did not receive any public comments.

    Description of Marine Mammals in the Area of Specified Activities

    Sections 3 and 4 of the application summarize available information regarding status and trends, distribution and habitat preferences, and behavior and life history of the potentially affected species. NMFS fully considered all of this information, and we refer the reader to these descriptions, instead of reprinting the information. Additional information regarding population trends and threats may be found in NMFS' Stock Assessment Reports (SARs; https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/marine-mammal-stock-assessments ) and more general information about these species ( e.g., physical and behavioral descriptions) may be found on NMFS' website ( https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/find-species ).

    Table 1 lists all species or stocks for which take is expected and authorized for this activity and summarizes information related to the population or stock, including regulatory status under the MMPA and Endanger Species Act (ESA) and potential biological removal (PBR), where known. PBR is defined by the MMPA as the maximum number of animals, not including natural mortalities, that may be removed from a marine mammal stock while allowing that stock to reach or maintain its optimum sustainable population (as described in NMFS' SARs). While no serious injury or mortality is anticipated or authorized here, PBR and annual serious injury and mortality from anthropogenic sources are included here as gross indicators of the status of the species or stocks and other threats.

    Marine mammal abundance estimates presented in this document represent the total number of individuals that make up a given stock or the total number estimated within a particular study or survey area. NMFS' stock abundance estimates for most species represent the total estimate of individuals within the geographic area, if known, that comprises that stock. For some species, this geographic area may extend beyond U.S. waters. All managed stocks in this region are assessed in NMFS' U.S. Pacific SARs. All values presented in table 1 are the most recent available at the time of publication (including from the draft 2023 SARs) and are available online at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/marine-mammal-stock-assessments.

    Table 1—Species Likely Impacted by the Specified Activities

    Common name Scientific name Stock ESA/MMPA status; strategic (Y/N) Stock abundance (CV, N min , most recent abundance survey) PBR Annual M/SI
    Order Artiodactyla—Infraorder Cetacea—Mysticeti (baleen whales)
    Family Eschrichtiidae (baleen whale):
    Gray Whale Eschrichtius robustus Eastern N Pacific -, -, N 26,960 (0.05, 25,849, 2016) 801 131
    Family Balaenopteridae (rorquals)
    Humpback whale Megaptera novaeangliae Central America/Southern Mexico—CA/OR/WA E, D, Y 1,494 (0.171, 1,284, 2021) 3.5 14.9
    Mainland Mexico—CA/OR/WA T, D, Y 3,477 (0.101, 3,185, 2018) 43 22
    Odontoceti (toothed whales, dolphins, and porpoises)
    Family Delphinidae:
    Killer whale Orcinus orca West Coast Transient -, -, N 349 (N/A, 349, 2018) 3.5 0.4
    Family Phocoenidae (porpoises):
    Harbor porpoise Phocoena phocoena Northern OR/WA Coast -, -, N 22,074 (0.391, 16,068, 2022) 161 3.2
    Order Carnivora—Pinnipedia
    Family Otariidae (eared seals and sea lions):
    Steller sea lion Eumetopias jubatus Eastern DPS -, -, N 36,308 (N/A, 36,308, 2022) 2,178 93.2
    California sea lion Zalophus californianus U.S -, -, N 257,606 (N/A, 233,515, 2014) 14,011 >321
    Family Phocidae (earless seals):
    Harbor seal Phoca vitulina OR/WA Coastal -, -, N UNK (UNK, UNK, 1999) UND 10.6
    Northern elephant seal Mirounga angustirostris CA Breeding -, -, N 187,386 (N/A, 85,369, 2013) 5,122 13.7
    Information on the classification of marine mammal species can be found on the web page for The Society for Marine Mammalogy's Committee on Taxonomy.
    Endangered Species Act (ESA) status: Endangered (E), Threatened (T)/MMPA status: Depleted (D). A dash (-) indicates that the species is not listed under the ESA or designated as depleted under the MMPA. Under the MMPA, a strategic stock is one for which the level of direct human-caused mortality exceeds PBR or which is determined to be declining and likely to be listed under the ESA within the foreseeable future. Any species or stock listed under the ESA is automatically designated under the MMPA as depleted and as a strategic stock.
    NMFS marine mammal stock assessment reports online at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/marine-mammal-stock-assessment-reports-region. CV is coefficient of variation; N min is the minimum estimate of stock abundance. In some cases, CV is not applicable.
    These values, found in NMFS's SARs, represent annual levels of human-caused mortality plus serious injury from all sources combined ( e.g., commercial fisheries, ship strike). Annual M/SI often cannot be determined precisely and is in some cases presented as a minimum value or range. A CV associated with estimated mortality due to commercial fisheries is presented in some cases.

    Table 2—Marine Mammal Hearing Groups

    [NMFS, 2018]

    Hearing group Generalized hearing range *
    Low-frequency (LF) cetaceans (baleen whales) 7 Hz to 35 kHz.
    Mid-frequency (MF) cetaceans (dolphins, toothed whales, beaked whales, bottlenose whales) 150 Hz to 160 kHz.
    High-frequency (HF) cetaceans (true porpoises, Kogia, river dolphins, Cephalorhynchid, Lagenorhynchus cruciger & L. australis) 275 Hz to 160 kHz.
    Phocid pinnipeds (PW) (underwater) (true seals) 50 Hz to 86 kHz.
    Otariid pinnipeds (OW) (underwater) (sea lions and fur seals) 60 Hz to 39 kHz.
    * Represents the generalized hearing range for the entire group as a composite ( i.e., all species within the group), where individual species' hearing ranges are typically not as broad. Generalized hearing range chosen based on ~65 dB threshold from normalized composite audiogram, with the exception for lower limits for LF cetaceans (Southall et al. 2007) and PW pinniped (approximation).

    Table 3—Thresholds Identifying the Onset of Permanent Threshold Shift

    Hearing group PTS onset acoustic thresholds * (received level)
    Impulsive Non-impulsive
    Low-Frequency (LF) Cetaceans Cell 1:L pk,flat: 219 dB; L E,LF,24h: 183 dB Cell 2:L E,LF,24h: 199 dB.
    Mid-Frequency (MF) Cetaceans Cell 3:L pk,flat: 230 dB; L E,MF,24h: 185 dB Cell 4:L E,MF,24h: 198 dB.
    High-Frequency (HF) Cetaceans Cell 5:L pk,flat: 202 dB; L E,HF,24h: 155 dB Cell 6:L E,HF,24h: 173 dB.
    Phocid Pinnipeds (PW) (Underwater) Cell 7:L pk,flat: 218 dB; L E,PW,24h: 185 dB Cell 8:L E,PW,24h: 201 dB.
    Otariid Pinnipeds (OW) (Underwater) Cell 9:L pk,flat: 232 dB; L E,OW,24h: 203 dB Cell 10:L E,OW,24h: 219 dB.
    * Dual metric acoustic thresholds for impulsive sounds: Use whichever results in the largest isopleth for calculating PTS onset. If a non-impulsive sound has the potential of exceeding the peak sound pressure level thresholds associated with impulsive sounds, these thresholds should also be considered.
    Note: Peak sound pressure ( L pk ) has a reference value of 1 µPa, and cumulative sound exposure level ( L E ) has a reference value of 1µPa s. In this table, thresholds are abbreviated to reflect American National Standards Institute standards (ANSI 2013). However, peak sound pressure is defined by ANSI as incorporating frequency weighting, which is not the intent for this Technical Guidance. Hence, the subscript “flat” is being included to indicate peak sound pressure should be flat weighted or unweighted within the generalized hearing range. The subscript associated with cumulative sound exposure level thresholds indicates the designated marine mammal auditory weighting function (LF, MF, and HF cetaceans, and PW and OW pinnipeds) and that the recommended accumulation period is 24 hours. The cumulative sound exposure level thresholds could be exceeded in a multitude of ways ( i.e., varying exposure levels and durations, duty cycle). When possible, it is valuable for action proponents to indicate the conditions under which these acoustic thresholds will be exceeded.

    Table 4—Proxy Sound Source Levels for Pile Sizes and Driving Methods

    Pile size Method Proxy source level (at 10 m) Literature source
    dB RMS re 1µPa dB SEL re 1µPa sec dB peak re 1µPa
    24-in Vibratory 154 N/A N/A Navy 2015.
    24-in sheet pile Vibratory 160 N/A N/A Caltrans 2020.
    24-in Impact 189 178 203 Caltrans 2015.

    Table 5—User Spreadsheet Inputs for Calculating Level A Harassment Isopleths

    Pile size and installation method Spreadsheet tab used Weighting factor adjustment (kHz) Number of strikes per pile Number of piles per day Activity duration (minutes)
    24-in vibratory installation (MOF Option 2) A.1 Vibratory pile driving 2.5 N/A 8 20
    24-in vibratory removal (MOF Option 2) A.1 Vibratory pile driving 2.5 N/A 16 5
    24-in sheet pile vibratory installation (MOF Option 1) A.1 Vibratory pile driving 2.5 N/A 25 15
    24-in sheet pile vibratory removal (MOF Option 1) A.1 Vibratory pile driving 2.5 N/A 60 3
    24-in vibratory installation (Pile Markers) A.1 Vibratory pile driving 2.5 N/A 8 15
    24-in impact installation (Pile Markers) E.1 Impact pile driving 2 225 5 N/A

    Table 6—Calculated Level A and Level B Harassment Isopleths

    Activity Level A harassment zone (m) Level B harassment zone (m)
    LF- cetaceans MF- cetaceans HF- cetaceans Phocids Otariids
    24-in Steel Pipe Pile Vibratory Install (MOF Option 2) 4.5 0.4 6.6 2.7 0.2 1,847.8
    24-in Steel Pipe Pile Vibratory Removal (MOF Option 2) 2.8 0.3 4.2 1.7 0.1
    24-in sheet pile vibratory installation (MOF Option 1) 23.4 2.1 34.6 14.2 1.0 4,641.1
    24-in sheet pile vibratory removal (MOF Option 1) 12.2 1.1 18 7.4 0.5
    24-in vibratory installation (Pile Markers) 3.7 0.3 5.5 2.3 0.2 1,847.8
    24-in impact installation (Pile Markers) 501.4 17.8 597.2 268.3 19.5 857.7

    Table 7—Authorized Take by Level A and Level B Harassment, by Species and Stock

    Common name Stock Stock abundance Level A Level B Total take Take as a percentage
    Gray Whale Eastern N Pacific 26,960 0 2 2 <1
    Humpback Whale Central America/Southern Mexico-CA/OR/WA 1,494 0 7 7 <1
    Mainland Mexico-CA/OR/WA 3,477 0 9 9 <1
    Killer Whale West Coast Transients 349 0 7 7 2
    Harbor Porpoise Northern OR/WA Coast 22,074 0 18 18 <1
    Steller sea lion Eastern 36,308 0 889 889 2.4
    California Sea Lion United States 257,074 0 144 144 <1
    Harbor Seal OR/WA Coastal UKN 6 679 685 N/A
    Northern Elephant Seal CA Breeding 187,386 0 2 2 <1
    Stock size is best estimate of population (Nbest) according to NMFS 2022 Final Stock Assessment Reports and where apporiate the draft NMFS 2022 Final Stock Assessment Reports was used to estimate Nbest.

    Table 8—Shutdown Zones During Pile Installation and Removal

    Activity Pile size Shutdown zones (m)
    LF cetaceans MF cetaceans HF cetaceans Harbor seals Northern elephant seal Otariids
    Vibratory Installation 24-in (pile markers) 50 50 50 25 25 25
    Vibratory Installation and removal 24-in (MOF option 2) 50 50 50 25 25 25
    Vibratory Installation and removal 24-in sheet pile (MOF option 1) 50 50 50 25 25 25
    Impact Installation 24-in (pile markers) 510 50 600 150 270 25