Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Pile Driving Training Exercises at Naval Base Ventura County, Port Hueneme

Download PDF
Federal RegisterOct 23, 2024
89 Fed. Reg. 84534 (Oct. 23, 2024)
Document Headings

Document headings vary by document type but may contain the following:

  • the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
  • the number of the CFR title and the number of each part the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly related to
  • the agency docket number / agency internal file number
  • the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions
  • See the Document Drafting Handbook for more details.

    Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  • [RTID 0648-XE356]
  • AGENCY:

    National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

    ACTION:

    Notice; proposed issuance of an incidental harassment authorization; request for comments on proposed authorization and possible renewal.

    SUMMARY:

    NMFS has received a request from the United States Navy (Navy) for authorization to take marine mammals, by Level B harassment only, incidental to pile driving training exercises at Naval Base Ventura County, Port Hueneme (NBVC).

    NMFS previously issued an incidental harassment authorization IHA to the Navy for similar activities on April 28, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as the initial IHA); however, during the initial authorization period, only one of four planned training exercise was performed. The Navy is requesting, and NMFS is proposing to issue an IHA authorizing incidental take for an additional four training exercises. Pursuant to the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), NMFS is requesting comments on its proposal to issue an IHA to incidentally take marine mammals during the specified activities. NMFS is also requesting comments on a possible 1-year Renewal IHA that could be issued under certain circumstances and if all requirements are met, as described in Request for Public Comments at the end of this notice. NMFS will consider public comments prior to making any final decision on the issuance of the requested MMPA authorizations and agency responses will be summarized in the final notice of our decision. The Navy's activities are considered military readiness activities pursuant to the MMPA, as amended by the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (NDAA).

    DATES:

    Comments and information must be received no later than November 7, 2024.

    ADDRESSES:

    Comments should be addressed to Jolie Harrison, Chief, Permits and Conservation Division, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service, and should be submitted via email to ITP.tyson.moore@noaa.gov. Electronic copies of the application and supporting documents, as well as a list of the references cited in this document, may be obtained online at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/permit/incidental-take-authorizations-under-marine-mammal-protection-act. In case of problems accessing these documents, please call the contact listed below.

    Instructions: NMFS is not responsible for comments sent by any other method, to any other address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period. Comments, including all attachments, must not exceed a 25-megabyte file size. All comments received are a part of the public record and will generally be posted online at https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/permit/incidental-take-authorizations-under-marine-mammal-protection-act without change. All personal identifying information ( e.g., name, address) voluntarily submitted by the commenter may be publicly accessible. Do not submit confidential business information or otherwise sensitive or protected information.

    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

    Reny Tyson Moore, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, (301) 427-8401.

    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Background

    The MMPA prohibits the “take” of marine mammals, with certain exceptions. Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct the Secretary of Commerce (as delegated to NMFS) to allow, upon request, the incidental, but not intentional, taking of small numbers of marine mammals by U.S. citizens who engage in a specified activity (other than commercial fishing) within a specified geographical region if certain findings are made and either regulations are issued or, if the taking is limited to harassment, a notice of a proposed incidental take authorization may be provided to the public for review.

    Authorization for incidental takings shall be granted if NMFS finds that the taking will have a negligible impact on the species or stock(s) and will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the availability of the species or stock(s) for taking for subsistence uses (where relevant). Further, NMFS must prescribe the permissible methods of taking and other “means of effecting the least practicable adverse impact” on the affected species or stocks and their habitat, paying particular attention to rookeries, mating grounds, and areas of similar significance, and on the availability of such species or stocks for taking for certain subsistence uses (referred to in shorthand as “mitigation”); and requirements pertaining to the mitigation, monitoring and reporting of such takings are set forth.

    The NDAA (Pub. L. 108-136) removed the “small numbers” and “specified geographical region” limitations indicated above and amended the definition of “harassment” as it applies to a “military readiness activity.” The activity for which incidental take of marine mammals is being requested addressed here qualifies as a military readiness activity.

    National Environmental Policy Act

    To comply with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA; 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and NOAA Administrative Order (NAO) 216-6A, NMFS must review our proposed action ( i.e., the issuance of a Renewal IHA) with respect to potential impacts on the human environment. This action is consistent with categories of activities identified in Categorical Exclusion B4 (incidental take authorizations with no anticipated serious injury or mortality) of the Companion Manual for NOAA Administrative Order 216-6A, which do not individually or cumulatively have the potential for significant impacts on the quality of the human environment and for which we have not identified any extraordinary circumstances that would preclude this categorical exclusion. Accordingly, NMFS has preliminarily determined that the issuance of the proposed IHA qualifies to be categorically excluded from further NEPA review.

    We will review all comments submitted in response to this notification prior to concluding our NEPA process or making a final decision on the IHA request.

    History of Request

    On August 18, 2021, NMFS received a request from the Navy for an IHA to take marine mammals incidental to pile driving training exercises at NBVC. That application was deemed adequate and complete on January 12, 2023. NMFS published a notice of a proposed IHA and request for comments in the Federal Register on March 15, 2023 (88 FR 15956). We subsequently published the final notice of our issuance of the IHA on May 4, 2023 (88 FR 28517); the IHA was effective from May 1, 2023 through April 30, 2024. The specified activities were expected to result in the take of California sea lions ( Zalophus californius) and harbor seals ( Phoca vitulina richardii) by Level B harassment only. Neither the Navy nor NMFS expected serious injury or mortality to result from this activity and, therefore, an IHA was appropriate.

    On February 22, 2024 NMFS received notification from the Navy that only one of four planned training exercises were completed under the initial IHA. On March 5, 2023 the Navy requested a renewal of the initial IHA; however, the Navy and NMFS deemed that it would be appropriate to issue a proposed IHA rather than undertake the renewal process given the Navy's desire to request changes to the specified activity. On May 13, 2024, the Navy submitted an application requesting that a new IHA be issued that would allow take of California sea lions and harbor seals, by Level B harassment only, incidental to four pile driving training exercises at NBVC, effective for 1 year after the date of issuance. Revised applications were received on August 6, 2024, and September 12, 2024. The application was deemed adequate and complete on September 24, 2024. Proposed changes from the initial IHA include those associated with the Navy's request, in some instances, to install and remove additional piles during the training exercises over additional days ( i.e., more than were addressed in the initial IHA) due to emergent training requirements and tempo (see the Description of the Specified Activities and Anticipated Impacts section for more details). In addition, on May 3, 2024, NMFS published and solicited public comment on its draft Updated Technical Guidance (89 FR 36762), which includes updated hearing ranges and names for marine mammal hearing groups as well as updated thresholds and weighting functions to inform auditory injury estimates ( i.e., for Level A harassment). To ensure take by Level A harassment is appropriately considered, and in order to support consideration of the best available science, comparative calculations using both the existing NMFS Technical Guidance (NMFS, 2018) and the NMFS Updated Technical Guidance (NMFS, 2024) have been conducted and provided for consideration of take by Level A harassment. These proposed changes do not affect the previous analyses, mitigation, and monitoring requirements, or method of take calculations, outside of the inclusion of slightly larger Level A harassment zones and shutdown zones due to the increased numbers of piles anticipated to be installed and or removed within a day, and that the proposed training exercises would be completed in 136 days instead of 96 days. In evaluating the 2024 request and to the extent deemed appropriate, NMFS relies on the information presented in notices associated with the issuance of the initial IHA (88 FR 15956, March 15, 2023; 88 FR 28517, May 4, 2023).

    The Navy submitted a monitoring report on March 4, 2023, based on the work completed under the initial IHA, which confirms that the applicant implemented the required mitigation and monitoring during the initial year of the activity, and that they did not exceed the authorized levels of take under the initial IHA. These monitoring results, as well as the Navy's current request and application, are available to the public on our website: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/action/incidental-take-authorization-us-navy-pile-training-exercises-naval-base-ventura-county-port.

    Description of the Proposed Activities and Anticipated Impacts

    Overview

    The primary mission of NBVC is to provide a home port and to furnish training, administrative, and logistical support for the Naval Construction Battalions. As described in the initial IHA, Naval Construction Group ONE proposed to execute pile driving training exercises at NBVC that are essential to construction battalion personnel prior to deployment. The specific components of each exercise could vary based on the specific training requirements for each battalion, but could include vibratory and impact pile driving, temporary pier construction, and subsequent removal of all installed materials. These are military readiness activities, as defined under the NDAA of Fiscal Year 2004 (Pub. L. 108-136).

    Under the initial IHA, the Navy requested take by Level B harassment for California sea lions and harbor seals incidental to up to four pile driving training exercises, each of which could include installation and removal of a sheet pile wall and round pile pier. Level A harassment was not anticipated, requested, or authorized. It was estimated that each training exercise could take up to 24 days (12 days for pile installation and 12 days for pile removal), for a total of up to 96 days over the four training exercises. Due to issues with equipment, the Navy only performed one training activity for 11 days during the initial authorization period. The Navy is requesting a new IHA so that it can complete an additional four training exercises during the new IHA period. Due to emergent training requirements and tempo, the Navy is requesting, in some instances, to install and remove additional piles during the training exercises across a total of 136 days (34 active in-water pile driving per training exercise). The new IHA, if authorized, would be valid for 1 year from the date of issuance.

    To support public review and comment on the IHA that NMFS is proposing to issue here, we refer to the documents related to the previously issued IHA and discuss any new or changed information here. The previous documents include the Federal Register notice of the proposed IHA (88 FR 15956, March 15, 2023), the Federal Register notice of issuance of the initial IHA (88 FR 28517, May 4, 2023), and all associated references and documents. We also refer the reader to the Navy's previous and current applications and monitoring reports which can be found at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/action/incidental-take-authorization-us-navy-pile-training-exercises-naval-base-ventura-county-port.

    Dates and Duration

    The initial IHA considered 96 total annual days of active in-water pile installation and removal, which would be spread over four annual training exercises, each of which was estimated to last 24 days. The current request considers a total of 136 total annual days of active water in-water pile installation and removal spread over four annual training exercises ( i.e., each training exercise is estimated to last up to 34 days). Each workday would occur during daylight hours, and would last approximately 8 hours, but pile installation/removal would not occur for the entire eight hours. Due to the availability of resources, requirements by NBVC for port use, and battalion training needs, it is not possible to predict the precise dates of training activities; however, no more than four separate training events would occur over the duration of the proposed 1-year IHA.

    Specific Geographic Region

    A detailed description of the specific geographic region for the Navy's activities is found in the Federal Register notice of the proposed IHA for the initial IHA (88 FR 15956, March 15, 2023) and associated documents (available at https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/action/incidental-take-authorization-us-navy-pile-training-exercises-naval-base-ventura-county-port ). This description remains accurate and is referenced herein.

    Detailed Description of the Activity

    A detailed description of the training exercise for which take is proposed here may be found in the Federal Register notices of the proposed and final IHA for the initial authorization (88 FR 15956, March 15, 2023 and 88 FR 28517, May 4, 2023, respectively), and in associated documents (available at https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/action/incidental-take-authorization-us-navy-pile-training-exercises-naval-base-ventura-county-port ). The description, including of the activities, including the types of equipment planned for use, are identical to those described in the previous notices and remains accurate with the exception of anticipated production rates, which are described in more detail below.

    The Navy has requested, in some instances, to increase the number of piles that may be driven in a day due to emergent training requirements and tempo. Differences between the initial and proposed IHAs are shown in table 1. Specifically, the initial IHA considered that a total of 15 24-inch steel sheet piles, 10 16-inch timber piles, and 4 14-inch H-beam steel piles may be driven during each training exercise. The current request proposes that up to 30 24-inch steel sheet piles, 12 16-inch timber piles, and 6 14-inch H-beam steel piles may be driven during each training exercise. These changes represent a 65.5-percent increase in the total number of piles anticipated to be installed and removed each training exercise.

    Anticipated production rates for installation and removal with a vibratory and or impact hammer, and how these rates compared to the initial IHA, are provided in table 1. To allow for unanticipated variation in production rates and to account for any training that is slowed or delayed due to the need to meet specific training or mitigation requirements ( e.g., additional delays or shutdowns due to larger shutdown zones; see the Proposed Mitigation section of this notice for more details), the Navy has added buffer days to the total anticipated activity days proposed for the training exercises. The buffers for vibratory pile installation and removal include 12 days for 24-inch steel sheets, 3 days for 16-in round timber piles, and 3 days for 14-in steel H-piles. The buffers for impact driving include 4 days for 16-in round timber piles and 3 days for 14-in steel H-piles. With these buffer days added, the Navy anticipates that pile driving could occur on up to 34 days each training exercise, for a total of 136 days spread across the four training exercises. Buffer days were not considered in the initial IHA. The initial IHA anticipated that it could take 5 days to install and 5 days to remove the 24-inch steel sheets, 5 days to install and 5 days to remove 16-in round timber piles, and 2 days to install and 2 days to remove the 14-in steel H-piles, for a total of 24 days per training exercise and 96 days during the 1-year IHA effective period (see table 1 in the Federal Register notices of the proposed and final IHA for the initial authorization; 88 FR 15956, March 15, 2023 and 88 FR 28517, May 4, 2023, respectively). Therefore, the current proposed training exercises could occur for up to 10 additional days each training exercise and up to 40 additional days during the proposed 1-year authorization period compared to the initial IHA.

    Table 1—Summary of Pile Details and Estimated Production Rates for Pile Installation and Removal During Each Training Exercise for the Initial and Proposed IHAs

    Pile size/type/shape Authorization Number of sheets/piles Vibratory installation/ removal duration per pile Potential impact strikes per pile, if needed Production rate (piles/day) Days of installation Days of removal Buffer days Total days per exercise
    Installation Removal
    Vibratory hammer Impact hammer Vibratory hammer Impact hammer
    24-in Steel Sheet Initial IHA Proposed IHA 15 30 10/20 minutes 10/30 minutes NA NA 3 30 3 NA 3 30 NA NA 5 1 5 1 0 12 10 14
    12-in Timber Pile Initial IHA Proposed IHA 10 12 20/30 minutes 20/30 minutes 1,800 1,800 2 12 2 6 2 12 NA NA 5 2 5 1 0 7 10 10
    14-in H-Beam Pile Initial IHA Proposed IHA 4 6 20/30 minutes 20/30 minutes 1,800 1,800 2 6 2 2 2 6 NA NA 2 3 2 1 0 6 4 10
    Totals for the Initial IHA 7.17 hours/12 hours NA 12 12 0 24
    Totals for the Proposed IHA 11 hours/24 hours NA 6 3 25 34
    Buffer days are included in the proposed IHA to allow for unanticipated variation in production rates and to account for any training that is slowed or delayed due to the need to meet specific training or mitigation requirements; buffer days were not considered in the initial IHA.

    Table 2—Marine Mammal Hearing Groups

    [NMFS, 2018]

    Hearing group Generalized hearing range *
    Low-frequency (LF) cetaceans (baleen whales) 7 Hz to 35 kHz.
    Mid-frequency (MF) cetaceans (dolphins, toothed whales, beaked whales, bottlenose whales) 150 Hz to 160 kHz.
    High-frequency (HF) cetaceans (true porpoises, Kogia, river dolphins, Cephalorhynchid, Lagenorhynchus cruciger & L. australis) 275 Hz to 160 kHz.
    Phocid pinnipeds (PW) (underwater) (true seals) 50 Hz to 86 kHz.
    Otariid pinnipeds (OW) (underwater) (sea lions and fur seals) 60 Hz to 39 kHz.
    * Represents the generalized hearing range for the entire group as a composite ( i.e., all species within the group), where individual species' hearing ranges are typically not as broad. Generalized hearing range chosen based on ~65-dB threshold from normalized composite audiogram, with the exception for lower limits for LF cetaceans (Southall et al., 2007) and PW pinniped (approximation).

    Table 3—Marine Mammal Hearing Groups

    [NMFS, 2024]

    Hearing group Generalized hearing range *
    Underwater:
    Low-frequency (LF) cetaceans (baleen whales) 7 Hz to 36 kHz.
    High-frequency (HF) cetaceans (dolphins, toothed whales, beaked whales, bottlenose whales) 150 Hz to 160 kHz.
    Very High-frequency (VHF) cetaceans (true porpoises, Kogia, river dolphins, Cephalorhynchid, Lagenorhynchus cruciger & L. australis) 200 Hz to 165 kHz.
    Phocid pinnipeds (PW) (underwater) (true seals) 40 Hz to 90 kHz.
    Otariid pinnipeds (OW) (underwater) (sea lions and fur seals) 60 Hz to 68 kHz.
    In-Air:
    Phocid pinnipeds (PA) (true seals) 42 Hz to 52 kHz.
    Otariid pinnipeds (OA) (sea lions and fur seals) 90 Hz to 40 kHz.
    * Represents the generalized hearing range for the entire group as a composite ( i.e., all species within the group), where individual species' hearing ranges may not be as broad. Generalized hearing range chosen based on ~65-dB threshold from composite audiogram, previous analysis in NMFS 2018, and/or data from Southall et al., 2007; Southall et al., 2019. Additionally, animals are able to detect very loud sounds above and below that “generalized” hearing range

    Table 4—NMFS' 2018 Thresholds Identifying the Onset of Permanent Threshold Shift (PTS)

    Hearing group PTS onset acoustic thresholds (received level)
    Impulsive Non-impulsive
    Low-Frequency (LF) Cetaceans Cell 1: L pk,flat : 219 dB; L E,LF,24h : 183 dB Cell 2: L E,LF,24h : 199 dB.
    Mid-Frequency (MF) Cetaceans Cell 3: L pk,flat : 230 dB; L E,MF,24h : 185 dB Cell 4: L E,MF,24h : 198 dB.
    High-Frequency (HF) Cetaceans Cell 5: L pk,flat : 202 dB; L E,HF,24h : 155 dB Cell 6: L E,HF,24h : 173 dB.
    Phocid Pinnipeds (PW) (Underwater) Cell 7: L pk,flat : 218 dB; L E,PW,24h : 185 dB Cell 8: L E,PW,24h : 201 dB.
    Otariid Pinnipeds (OW) (Underwater) Cell 9: L pk,flat : 232 dB; L E,OW,24h : 203 dB Cell 10: L E,OW,24h : 219 dB.
    Dual metric acoustic thresholds for impulsive sounds: Use whichever results in the largest isopleth for calculating PTS onset. If a non-impulsive sound has the potential of exceeding the peak sound pressure level thresholds associated with impulsive sounds, these thresholds should also be considered.
    Note: Peak sound pressure ( L pk ) has a reference value of 1 µPa, and cumulative sound exposure level ( L E ) has a reference value of 1µPa s. In this table, thresholds are abbreviated to reflect American National Standards Institute standards (ANSI, 2013). However, peak sound pressure is defined by ANSI as incorporating frequency weighting, which is not the intent for NMFS' 2018 Technical Guidance. Hence, the subscript “flat” is being included to indicate peak sound pressure should be flat weighted or unweighted within the generalized hearing range. The subscript associated with cumulative sound exposure level thresholds indicates the designated marine mammal auditory weighting function (LF, MF, and HF cetaceans, and PW and OW pinnipeds) and that the recommended accumulation period is 24 hours. The cumulative sound exposure level thresholds could be exceeded in a multitude of ways ( i.e., varying exposure levels and durations, duty cycle). When possible, it is valuable for action proponents to indicate the conditions under which these acoustic thresholds will be exceeded.

    Table 5—NMFS' 2024 Thresholds Identifying the Onset of Auditory Injury (AUD INJ)

    Hearing group AUD INJ acoustic thresholds (received level)
    Impulsive Non-impulsive
    Underwater:
    Low-Frequency (LF) Cetaceans Cell 1: Lp, 0-pk,flat : 222 dB; L E, p, LF,24h : 183 dB Cell 2: L E, p, LF,24h : 197 dB.
    High-Frequency (HF) Cetaceans Cell 3: Lp, 0-pk,flat : 230 dB; L E, p, HF,24h : 193 dB Cell 4: L E, p, HF,24h : 201 dB.
    Very High-Frequency (VHF) Cetaceans Cell 5: Lp, 0-pk,flat : 202 dB; L E, p, VHF,24h : 159 dB Cell 6: L E , p, VHF,24h : 181 dB.
    Phocid Pinnipeds (PW) (Underwater) Cell 7: Lp, 0-pk,flat : 223 dB; L E, p, PW,24h: 183 dB Cell 8: L E, p, PW,24h: 195 dB.
    Otariid Pinnipeds (OW) (Underwater) Cell 9: Lp, 0-pk,flat : 230 dB; L E, p, OW,24h : 185 dB Cell 10: L E, p, OW,24h : 199 dB.
    In-Air:
    Phocid Pinnipeds (PA) (In-Air) Cell 11: Lp, 0-pk.flat : 162 dB; L E, p, PA,24h : 140 dB Cell 12: L E, p, PA,24h : 154 dB.
    Otariid Pinnipeds (OA) (In-Air) Cell 13: Lp, 0-pk,flat : 177 dB; L E, p, OA,24h : 163 dB Cell 14: L E, p, OA,24h : 177 dB.
    Dual metric acoustic thresholds for impulsive sounds: Use whichever results in the largest isopleth for calculating AUD INJ onset. If a non-impulsive sound has the potential of exceeding the peak sound pressure level thresholds associated with impulsive sounds, these thresholds should also be considered.
    Note: Peak sound pressure ( L pk ) has a reference value of 1 µPa, and cumulative sound exposure level ( L E ) has a reference value of 1µPa s. In this table, thresholds are abbreviated to reflect American National Standards Institute standards (ANSI, 2013). However, peak sound pressure is defined by ANSI as incorporating frequency weighting, which is not the intent for NMFS' 2018 Technical Guidance. Hence, the subscript “flat” is being included to indicate peak sound pressure should be flat weighted or unweighted within the generalized hearing range. The subscript associated with cumulative sound exposure level thresholds indicates the designated marine mammal auditory weighting function (LF, MF, and HF cetaceans, and PW and OW pinnipeds) and that the recommended accumulation period is 24 hours. The cumulative sound exposure level thresholds could be exceeded in a multitude of ways ( i.e., varying exposure levels and durations, duty cycle). When possible, it is valuable for action proponents to indicate the conditions under which these acoustic thresholds will be exceeded.

    Table 6—NMFS User Spreadsheet Inputs

    Vibratory pile driving Impact pile driving
    16-Inch timber piles 14-Inch steel H beam 24-Inch steel sheet 16-Inch timber piles 14-Inch steel H beam
    Spreadsheet Tab Used A.1) Non-Impul, Stat, Cont A.1) Non-Impul, Stat, Cont A.1) Non-Impul, Stat, Cont E.1) Impact pile driving E.1) Impact pile driving.
    Source Level (SPL) 162 dB RMS 147 dB RMS 159 dB RMS 160 dB SEL 170 dB SEL.
    Transmission Loss Coefficient 15 15 15 15 15.
    Weighting Factor Adjustment (kHz) 2.5 2.5 2.5 2 2.
    Time to install/remove single pile (minutes) 30 30 30
    Number of strikes per pile 1,800 1,800.
    Piles to install/remove per day 12 6 30 6 2.
    Distance of sound pressure level measurement (meters) 10 10 11 10 10.

    Table 7—Calculated Distances and Areas to the Estimated Level A (Based on NMFS' 2018 Technical Guidance and NMFS' Proposed 2024 Update to the 2018 Technical Guidance) and Level B Harassment Thresholds by Pile Type and Pile Driving Method for the Initial and Proposed IHAs

    Activity Pile description Authorization period Piles per day Level A harassment distances (m) (2018 Technical Guidance/2024 Proposed Update to the 2018 Technical Guidance) Level A harassment areas (km ) for all hearing groups Level B harassment distance (m) all hearing groups Level B harassment areas (km ) for all hearing groups
    PW OW
    Vibratory Installation/Removal 16-inch Timber Piles Initial IHA Proposed IHA 3 12 4.8 16.0/45.7 0.3 1.1/15.4 <0.1 <0.1 6,310 6,310 <0.3 <0.3
    14-inch Steel H Beam Initial IHA Proposed IHA 2 6 0.5 1.0/2.9 0 0.1/1.0 <0.1 <0.1 631 631 <0.3 <0.3
    24-inch Steel Sheet Initial IHA Proposed IHA 3 30 3.4 20.4/ 58.4 0.2 1.4/ 19.7 <0.1 <0.1 4,379 4,379 <0.3 <0.3
    Impact Installation 16-inch Timber Piles Initial IHA Proposed IHA 3 6 36.8 76.5/126.5 2.7 5.6/47.1 <0.1 <0.1 47 47 <0.1 <0.1
    14-inch Steel H-Beam Initial IHA Proposed IHA 2 2 170.6 170.6/282.2 12.4 12.4/105.2 <0.1 <0.1 216 216 <0.1 <0.1
    The initial IHA only calculated distances to the Level A harassment thresholds based on the 2018 Technical Guidance, whereas the proposed IHA considers calculated distances to the Level A harassment thresholds based on both the 2018 Technical Guidance and the 2024 Proposed Update to the 2018 Technical Guidance.
    Harassment areas have been truncated where appropriate to account for land masses.
    The maximum harassment distances are approximately 790 m for Wharf 4 South, 795 m for Wharf 4 East, and 655 m for Wharf D due to the presence of land masses in the project area, which truncate sound transmission.
    The Navy made a typographical error made in their calculation of the distance to the Level A harassment thresholds. Specifically they used a sound pressure level measurement distance of 10 m when the correct measurement distance is 11 m. Therefore, the distances provided here are slightly larger than the distances provided in their IHA application.

    Table 8—Amount of Authorized Take in the Initial IHA and Proposed Take as a Percentage of Stock Abundance, by Stock and Harassment Type

    Species Stock Authorization Proposed amount of taking Percent of stock
    Level A Level B Total
    California Sea Lion U.S Initial IHA Proposed IHA 0 0 36,960 46,512 36,960 46,512 14.30 18.05
    Harbor Seal California Initial IHA Proposed IHA 0 0 2,016 2,856 2,016 2,856 6.51 9.22

    Table 9—Proposed Shutdown Zones During In-Water Pile Driving Activities for the Initial and Proposed IHAs

    Activity Pile description Authorization period Distance (m)
    PW OW
    Vibratory Installation/Removal 16-inch Timber Piles Initial IHA Proposed IHA 15 20/50 15 >20/50
    14-inch Steel H Beam Initial IHA Proposed IHA 15 20/20 15 20/20
    24-inch Steel Sheet Initial IHA Proposed IHA 15 30/60 15 30/60
    Impact Installation 16-inch Timber Piles Initial IHA Proposed IHA 40 80/130 40 80/130
    14-inch Steel H-Beam Initial IHA Proposed IHA 175 175/290 175 175/290
    Shutdown zones for the proposed IHA consider calculated distances to the Level A harassment thresholds based on both the 2018 Technical Guidance and the 2024 Proposed Update to the 2018 Technical Guidance, whereas shutdown zones for the initial IHA only considered calculated distances to the Level A harassment thresholds based on the 2018 Technical Guidance. Here, we are proposing the Navy implement the larger distance as the shutdown zones, which consider the 2024 Proposed Update to the 2018 Technical Guidance.
    The Navy considered a shutdown zone of 20 m due to a typographical error made in their calculation of the distance to the Level A harassment thresholds. Specifically they used a sound pressure level measurement distance of 10 m when the correct measurement distance is 11 m.