Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to a Marine Geophysical Survey in the Nauru Basin of Greater Micronesia in the Northwest Pacific Ocean

Download PDF
Federal RegisterOct 8, 2024
89 Fed. Reg. 81429 (Oct. 8, 2024)
Document Headings

Document headings vary by document type but may contain the following:

  • the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
  • the number of the CFR title and the number of each part the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly related to
  • the agency docket number / agency internal file number
  • the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions
  • See the Document Drafting Handbook for more details.

    Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  • [RTID 0648-XE162]
  • AGENCY:

    National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

    ACTION:

    Notice; proposed incidental harassment authorization; request for comments on proposed authorization and possible renewal.

    SUMMARY:

    NMFS received a request from the Scripps Institution of Oceanography (SIO) for authorization to take marine mammals incidental to a marine geophysical survey in the Nauru Basin of greater Micronesia in the northwest (NW) Pacific Ocean. Pursuant to the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), NMFS is requesting comments on its proposal to issue an incidental harassment authorization (IHA) to incidentally take marine mammals during the specified activities. NMFS is also requesting comments on a possible one-time, 1-year renewal that could be issued under certain circumstances and if all requirements are met, as described in Request for Public Comments at the end of this notice. NMFS will consider public comments prior to making any final decision on the issuance of the requested MMPA authorization and agency responses will be summarized in the final notice of our decision.

    DATES:

    Comments and information must be received no later than November 7, 2024.

    ADDRESSES:

    Comments should be addressed to Jolie Harrison, Chief, Permits and Conservation Division, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service and should be submitted via email to ITP.wachtendonk@noaa.gov. Electronic copies of the application and supporting documents, as well as a list of the references cited in this document, may be obtained online at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/incidental-take-authorizations-research-and-other-activities. In case of problems accessing these documents, please call the contact listed below.

    Instructions: NMFS is not responsible for comments sent by any other method, to any other address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period. Comments, including all attachments, must not exceed a 25-megabyte file size. All comments received are a part of the public record and will generally be posted online at https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/permit/incidental-take-authorizations-under-marine-mammal-protection-act without change. All personal identifying information ( e.g., name, address) voluntarily submitted by the commenter may be publicly accessible. Do not submit confidential business information or otherwise sensitive or protected information.

    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

    Rachel Wachtendonk, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, (301) 427-8401.

    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Background

    The MMPA prohibits the “take” of marine mammals, with certain exceptions. Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct the Secretary of Commerce (as delegated to NMFS) to allow, upon request, the incidental, but not intentional, taking of small numbers of marine mammals by U.S. citizens who engage in a specified activity (other than commercial fishing) within a specific geographic region if certain findings are made and either regulations are proposed or, if the taking is limited to harassment, a notice of a proposed IHA is provided to the public for review.

    Authorization for incidental takings shall be granted if NMFS finds that the taking will have a negligible impact on the species or stock(s) and will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the availability of the species or stock(s) for taking for subsistence uses (where relevant). Further, NMFS must prescribe the permissible methods of taking and other “means of effecting the least practicable adverse impact” on the affected species or stocks and their habitat, paying particular attention to rookeries, mating grounds, and areas of similar significance, and on the availability of the species or stocks for taking for certain subsistence uses (referred to in shorthand as “mitigation”); and requirements pertaining to the monitoring and reporting of the takings. The definitions of all applicable MMPA statutory terms cited above are included in the relevant sections below.

    National Environmental Policy Act

    To comply with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA; 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and NOAA Administrative Order (NAO) 216-6A, NMFS must review our proposed action ( i.e., the issuance of an IHA) with respect to potential impacts on the human environment.

    This action is consistent with categories of activities identified in Categorical Exclusion B4 (IHAs with no anticipated serious injury or mortality) of the Companion Manual for NAO 216-6A, which do not individually or cumulatively have the potential for significant impacts on the quality of the human environment and for which we have not identified any extraordinary circumstances that would preclude this categorical exclusion. Accordingly, NMFS has preliminarily determined that the issuance of the proposed IHA qualifies to be categorically excluded from further NEPA review.

    Summary of Request

    On June 6, 2024, NMFS received a request from the Scripps Institution of Oceanography (SIO) for an IHA to take marine mammals incidental to a marine geophysical survey in the Nauru Basin of greater Micronesia in the northwest (NW) Pacific Ocean. The application was deemed adequate and complete on July 30, 2024. SIO's request is for take of 27 species of marine mammals, by Level B harassment only. Neither SIO nor NMFS expect serious injury or mortality to result from this activity and, therefore, an IHA is appropriate.

    Description of Proposed Activity

    Overview

    Researchers from the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) and University of Houston, with funding from the National Science Foundation (NSF), and implementation by SIO, propose to conduct a low-energy marine seismic survey using airguns as the acoustic source from the research vessel (R/V) Sikuliaq ( Sikuliaq), which is owned by NSF and operated by the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF). The proposed survey would occur in the Nauru Basin of greater Micronesia in the NW Pacific Ocean from approximately December 2024 to January 2025. The proposed survey would occur in International Waters and within the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) of the Republic of Marshall Islands, in water depths ranging from approximately 4,000-6,000 meters (m). To complete this 2-dimensional (2-D) multi-channel seismic (MCS) reflection survey, the Sikuliaq would tow a 4-airgun array with a total discharge volume of ~420 cubic inches (in3 ) at a depth of 3 m, operated by marine technicians from SIO. The airgun array receiver would consist of a 1,200 m long solid-state hydrophone streamer. The airguns would fire at a shot interval of 30 m. Approximately 3,158 kilometers (km) of seismic acquisition is planned. Airgun arrays would introduce underwater sounds that may result in take, by Level B harassment, of marine mammals.

    The purpose of the proposed survey is to examine magnetic reversals to help determine the process that causes changes in the Earth's magnetic field. The proposed seismic surveys are a prerequisite for processing magnetic data, as they will provide crucial information on the structure of the oceanic crust that is used to model the source of the magnetic signals.

    Dates and Duration

    The R/V Sikuliaq would likely mobilize from Honolulu, Hawaii, on December 7, 2024, and demobilize in Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia, on January 6, 2025, after the survey is completed. The survey is expected to last 27 days, including approximately 14 days of seismic operations and 13 days of transit.

    Specific Geographic Region

    The proposed survey would occur within approximately 6-20° N, 154-167° E, in International Waters and within the EEZ of the Republic of Marshall Islands, in water depths ranging from approximately 4,000 to 6,000 m. The region where the survey is proposed to occur is depicted in figure 1; the tracklines could occur anywhere within the polygon shown in figure 1. Representative survey tracklines are shown; however, some deviation in actual tracklines, including the order of survey operations, could be necessary for reasons such as science drivers, poor data quality, inclement weather, or mechanical issues with the research vessel and/or equipment. The R/V Sikuliaq would likely mobilize from Honolulu, Hawaii and demobilize in Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia.

    Figure 1—Location of the Proposed Seismic Survey in the Nauru Basin of Greater Micronesia in the NW Pacific Ocean

    Representative survey tracklines are included in the figure; however, the tracklines could occur anywhere within the survey area.

    Detailed Description of the Specified Activity

    The procedures to be used for the proposed survey would be similar to those used during previous seismic surveys by SIO and would use conventional seismic methodology. The survey would involve one source vessel, R/V Sikuliaq, which is owned by NSF and operated by UAF. During the low-energy MCS seismic reflection survey, R/V Sikuliaq would tow two strings, each with two Generator-Injector (GI) airguns. During the survey, both strings, totaling four active airguns with a total discharge volume of 420 in3 , would be used. The two airgun strings would be spaced 11 m apart and would be towed approximately 25 m behind the vessel. The airgun array configurations are illustrated in figure 2-11 of NSF and the U.S. Geological Survey's (USGS) Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS; NSF-USGS, 2011). (The PEIS is available online at: https://www.nsf.gov/geo/oce/envcomp/usgs-nsf-marine-seismic-research/nsf-usgs-final-eis-oeis_3june2011.pdf ). The receiving system would consist of a 1,200 m long solid-state hydrophone streamer. As the airgun arrays are towed along the survey lines, the hydrophone streamer would transfer the data to the on-board processing system.

    Approximately 3,158 km of seismic acquisition are planned. The survey would take place in water depths ranging from approximately 4,000 to 6,000 m. In addition to the operations of the airgun array, the ocean floor would be mapped with the Kongsberg EM 304 and the Kongsberg EM 710 multibeam echosounder (MBES), and a Knudsen Chirp 3260 sub-bottom profiler (SBP). A Teledyne RDI 75 kilohertz (kHz) Ocean Surveyor Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP) would be used to measure water current velocities, and a passive sea surface magnetometer and a shipboard gravitometer would also be used. Take of marine mammals is not expected to occur incidental to use of the MBES, SBP, and ADCP, whether or not the airguns are operating simultaneously with the other sources. Given their characteristics ( e.g., narrow downward-directed beam), marine mammals would experience no more than one or two brief ping exposures, if any exposure were to occur. NMFS does not expect that the use of these sources presents any reasonable potential to cause take of marine mammals.

    Proposed mitigation, monitoring, and reporting measures are described in detail later in this document (please see Proposed Mitigation and Proposed Monitoring and Reporting).

    Description of Marine Mammals in the Area of Specified Activities

    Sections 3 and 4 of the application summarize available information regarding status and trends, distribution and habitat preferences, and behavior and life history of the potentially affected species. NMFS fully considered all of this information, and we refer the reader to these descriptions, instead of reprinting the information. Additional information about these species ( e.g., physical and behavioral descriptions) may be found on NMFS' website ( https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/find-species ). NMFS refers the reader to the aforementioned source for general information regarding the species listed in table 1.

    The populations of marine mammals found in the survey area do not occur within the U.S. EEZ and therefore, are not assessed in NMFS' Stock Assessment Reports (SARs). For most species, there are no stocks defined for management purposes in the survey area, and NMFS is evaluating impacts at the species level and ranges for most species evaluated here are considered to be the North Pacific. As such, information on potential biological removal level (PBR; defined by the MMPA as the maximum number of animals, not including natural mortalities, that may be removed from a marine mammal stock while allowing that stock to reach or maintain its optimum sustainable population) and annual levels of serious injury and mortality from anthropogenic sources are not available for these marine mammal populations. Abundance estimates for marine mammals in the survey location were calculated using density data for marine mammals from a US Navy Technical Report for the region (DoN, 2018). The area covered in this report include the Mariana Islands Training and Testing (MITT) Study Area, within approximately 6-23° N, 122-150° E, and the Transit Corridor which spans from the MITT Study Area to the International Date Line.These abundance estimates are considered the best scientific information available on the abundance of marine mammal populations in the area.

    Table 1 lists all species or stocks for which take is expected and proposed to be authorized for this activity and summarizes information related to the population or stock, including regulatory status under the MMPA and Endangered Species Act (ESA).

    Table 1—Species Likely Impacted by the Specified Activities

    Common name Scientific name Stock/distinct population segment (DPS) ESA/MMPA status; strategic (Y/N) Abundance
    Order Artiodactyla—Cetacea—Mysticeti (baleen whales)
    Family Balaenopteridae (rorquals)
    Blue Whale Balaenoptera musculus NA E, D, Y 150
    Bryde's Whale Balaenoptera edeni NA -, -, N 1,596
    Fin Whale Balaenoptera physalus NA E, D, Y 46
    Humpback Whale Megaptera novaeangliae Western North Pacific DPS E, D, Y 2,673
    Humpback Whale Megaptera novaeangliae Oceania DPS -, -, N 2,673
    Minke Whale Balaenoptera acutorostrata NA -, -, N 450
    Sei Whale Balaenoptera borealis NA E, D, Y 821
    Omura's Whale Balaenoptera omurai NA -, -, N 160
    Odontoceti (toothed whales, dolphins, and porpoises)
    Family Physeteridae
    Sperm Whale Physeter macrocephalus NA E, D, Y 5,146
    Family Kogiidae
    Dwarf Sperm Whale Kogia sima NA -, -, N 27,395
    Pygmy Sperm Whale Kogia breviceps NA -, -, N 11,168
    Family Ziphiidae (beaked whales)
    Blainville's Beaked Whale Mesoplodon densirostris NA -, -, N 3,376
    Cuvier's Beaked Whale Ziphius cavirostris NA -, -, N 2,642
    Longman's Beaked Whale Indopacetus pacificus NA -, -, N 11,253
    Ginko-Toothed Beaked Whale Mesoplodon ginkgodens NA -, -, N 7,567
    Deraniyagala's Beaked Whale Mesoplodon hotaula NA -, -, N NA
    Family Delphinidae
    False Killer Whale Pseudorca crassidens NA -, -, N 4,218
    Killer Whale Orcinus orca NA -, -, N 253
    Melon-Headed Whale Peponocephala electra NA -, -, N 16,551
    Pygmy Killer Whale Feresa attenuata NA -, -, N 527
    Short-Finned Pilot Whale Globicephala macrorhynchus NA -, -, N 6,583
    Bottlenose Dolphin Tursiops truncatus NA -, -, N 1,076
    Fraser's Dolphin Lagenodelphis hosei NA -, -, N 76,476
    Pantropical Spotted Dolphin Stenella attenuata NA -, -, N 85,755
    Risso's Dolphin Grampus griseus NA -, -, N 17,184
    Rough-Toothed Dolphin Steno bredanensis NA -, -, N 1,815
    Spinner Dolphin Stenella longirostris NA -, -, N 5,232
    Striped Dolphin Stenella coeruleoalba NA -, -, N 24,528
    Endangered Species Act (ESA) status: Endangered (E), Threatened (T)/MMPA status: Depleted (D). A dash (-) indicates that the species is not listed under the ESA or designated as depleted under the MMPA. Under the MMPA, a strategic stock is one for which the level of direct human-caused mortality exceeds PBR or which is determined to be declining and likely to be listed under the ESA within the foreseeable future. Any species or stock listed under the ESA is automatically designated under the MMPA as depleted and as a strategic stock.
    Abundance estimates for marine mammals in the survey location were calculated using density data for marine mammals from the U.S. Navy Marine Species Density Database Phase III for the Mariana Islands Training and Testing Study Area report (DoN 2018).

    Table 2—Marine Mammal Hearing Groups (NMFS, 2018)

    Hearing group Generalized hearing range *
    Low-frequency (LF) cetaceans (baleen whales) 7 Hz to 35 kHz.
    Mid-frequency (MF) cetaceans (dolphins, toothed whales, beaked whales, bottlenose whales) 150 Hz to 160 kHz.
    High-frequency (HF) cetaceans (true porpoises, Kogia, river dolphins, Cephalorhynchid, Lagenorhynchus cruciger & L. australis) 275 Hz to 160 kHz.
    Phocid pinnipeds (PW) (underwater) (true seals) 50 Hz to 86 kHz.
    Otariid pinnipeds (OW) (underwater) (sea lions and fur seals) 60 Hz to 39 kHz.
    * Represents the generalized hearing range for the entire group as a composite ( i.e., all species within the group), where individual species' hearing ranges are typically not as broad. Generalized hearing range chosen based on ~65 dB threshold from normalized composite audiogram, with the exception for lower limits for LF cetaceans (Southall et al., 2007) and PW pinniped (approximation).

    Table 3—Marine Mammal Hearing Groups (NMFS, 2024)

    Hearing Group ^ Generalized Hearing Range *
    UNDERWATER
    Low-frequency (LF) cetaceans (baleen whales) 7 Hz to 36 kHz.
    High-frequency (HF) cetaceans (dolphins, toothed whales, beaked whales, bottlenose whales) 150 Hz to 160 kHz.
    Very High-frequency (VHF) cetaceans (true porpoises, Kogia, river dolphins, Cephalorhynchid, Lagenorhynchus cruciger & L. australis) 200 Hz to 165 kHz.
    Phocid pinnipeds (PW) (underwater) (true seals) 40 Hz to 90 kHz.
    Otariid pinnipeds (OW) (underwater) (sea lions and fur seals) 60 Hz to 68 kHz.
    ^ Southall et al. 2019 indicates that as more data become available there may be separate hearing group designations for Very Low-Frequency cetaceans (blue, fin, right, and bowhead whales) and Mid-Frequency cetaceans (sperm, killer, and beaked whales). However, at this point, all baleen whales are part of the LF cetacean hearing group, and sperm, killer, and beaked whales are part of the HF cetacean hearing group. Additionally, recent data indicates that as more data become available for Monachinae seals, separate hearing group designations may be appropriate for the two phocid subfamilies (Ruscher et al. 2021; Sills et al. 2021).
    * Represents the generalized hearing range for the entire group as a composite ( i.e., all species within the group), where individual species' hearing ranges may not be as broad. Generalized hearing range chosen based on ~65 dB threshold from composite audiogram, previous analysis in NMFS 2018, and/or data from Southall et al. 2007; Southall et al. 2019. Additionally, animals are able to detect very loud sounds above and below that “generalized” hearing range.
    + NMFS is aware that the National Marine Mammal Foundation successfully collected preliminary hearing data on two minke whales during their third field season (2023) in Norway. These data have implications for not only the generalized hearing range for low-frequency cetaceans but also on their weighting function. However, at this time, no official results have been published. Furthermore, a fourth field season (2024) is proposed, where more data will likely be collected. Thus, it is premature for us to propose any changes to our current Updated Technical Guidance. However, mysticete hearing data is identified as a special circumstance that could merit re-evaluating the acoustic criteria in this document. Therefore, we anticipate that once the data from both field seasons are published, it will likely necessitate updating this document ( i.e., likely after the data gathered in the summer 2024 field season and associated analysis are published).

    Table 4—NMFS' 2018 Thresholds Identifying the Onset of Permanent Threshold Shift (PTS)

    Hearing group PTS onset acoustic thresholds * (received level)
    Impulsive Non-impulsive
    Low-Frequency (LF) Cetaceans Cell 1: L pk,flat : 219 dB; L E,LF,24h : 183 dB Cell 2: L E,LF,24h : 199 dB.
    Mid-Frequency (MF) Cetaceans Cell 3: L pk,flat : 230 dB; L E,MF,24h : 185 dB Cell 4: L E,MF,24h : 198 dB.
    High-Frequency (HF) Cetaceans Cell 5: L pk,flat : 202 dB; L E,HF,24h : 155 dB Cell 6: L E,HF,24h : 173 dB.
    Phocid Pinnipeds (PW) (Underwater) Cell 7: L pk,flat : 218 dB; L E,PW,24h : 185 dB Cell 8: L E,PW,24h : 201 dB.
    Otariid Pinnipeds (OW) (Underwater) Cell 9: L pk,flat : 232 dB; L E,OW,24h : 203 dB Cell 10: L E,OW,24h : 219 dB.
    * Dual metric acoustic thresholds for impulsive sounds: Use whichever results in the largest isopleth for calculating PTS onset. If a non-impulsive sound has the potential of exceeding the peak sound pressure level thresholds associated with impulsive sounds, these thresholds should also be considered.
    Note: Peak sound pressure ( L pk ) has a reference value of 1 µPa, and cumulative sound exposure level ( L E ) has a reference value of 1µPa s. In this table, thresholds are abbreviated to reflect American National Standards Institute standards (ANSI, 2013). However, peak sound pressure is defined by ANSI as incorporating frequency weighting, which is not the intent for this Technical Guidance. Hence, the subscript “flat” is being included to indicate peak sound pressure should be flat weighted or unweighted within the generalized hearing range. The subscript associated with cumulative sound exposure level thresholds indicates the designated marine mammal auditory weighting function (LF, MF, and HF cetaceans, and PW and OW pinnipeds) and that the recommended accumulation period is 24 hours. The cumulative sound exposure level thresholds could be exceeded in a multitude of ways ( i.e., varying exposure levels and durations, duty cycle). When possible, it is valuable for action proponents to indicate the conditions under which these acoustic thresholds will be exceeded.

    Table 5—NMFS' 2024 Thresholds Identifying the Onset of Auditory Injury (AUD INJ)

    Hearing group PTS onset acoustic thresholds * (received level)
    Impulsive Non-impulsive
    Low-Frequency (LF) Cetaceans Cell 1: L p, 0-pk,flat : 222 dB; L E, p, LF,24h : 183 dB Cell 2: L E , P, LF,24h : 197 dB.
    High-Frequency (HF) Cetaceans Cell 3: L p, 0-pk,flat : 230 dB; L E , HF,24h : 193 dB Cell 4: L E, p, HF,24h : 201 dB.
    Very High-Frequency (VHF) Cetaceans Cell 5: L pk, 0-pk, flat : 202 dB; L E , p, VHF,24hr : 159 dB Cell 6: L E, p, VHF, 24h : 181 dB.
    Phocid Pinnipeds (PW) (Underwater) Cell 7: L p 0-pk,flat : 223 dB; L E,PW,24h : 185 dB Cell 8: L E, p, PW,24h : 195 dB.
    Otariid Pinnipeds (OW) (Underwater) Cell 9: L p 0-pk,flat : 230 dB; L E, p, OW,24h : 185 dB Cell 10: L E, p, OW,24h : 199 dB.
    * Dual metric criteria for impulsive sounds: Use whichever criteria results in the larger isopleth for calculating AUD INJ onset. If a non-impulsive sound has the potential of exceeding the peak sound pressure level criteria associated with impulsive sounds, the PK SPL criteria are recommended for consideration for non-impulsive sources.
    Note: Peak sound pressure level (L p,0-pk ) has a reference value of 1 µPa (underwater) and 20 µPa (in air), and weighted cumulative sound exposure level (LE,p) has a reference value of 1 µPa2s (underwater) and 20 µPa2s (in air). In this Table, criteria are abbreviated to be more reflective of International Organization for Standardization standards (ISO 2017; ISO 2020). The subscript “flat” is being included to indicate peak sound pressure are flat weighted or unweighted within the generalized hearing range of marine mammals underwater ( i.e., 7 Hz to 165 kHz) or in air ( i.e., 42 Hz to 52 kHz). The subscript associated with cumulative sound exposure level criteria indicates the designated marine mammal auditory weighting function (LF, HF, and VHF cetaceans, and PW, OW, PA, and OA pinnipeds) and that the recommended accumulation period is 24 hours. The weighted cumulative sound exposure level criteria could be exceeded in a multitude of ways ( i.e., varying exposure levels and durations, duty cycle). When possible, it is valuable for action proponents to indicate the conditions under which these criteria will be exceeded.

    Table 6—Predicted Radial Distances From the R/V Sikuliaq Seismic Source to Isopleth Corresponding to Level B Harassment Threshold

    Airgun configuration Tow depth (m) Water depth (m) Predicted distances (in m) to the Level B harassment threshold
    4 105-in airguns 3 >1,000 1,408

    Table 7—Modeled Radial Distance to Isopleths Corresponding to Level A Harassment Thresholds

    Low frequency cetaceans Mid frequency cetaceans High frequency cetaceans
    PTS SEL cum 38.5 0 0.1
    PTS Peak 12.4 NA/0 85.8
    The largest distance (in bold) of the dual criteria (SEL cum or Peak) was used to estimate threshold distances and potential takes by Level A harassment.
    NA not applicable or available and assumed to be 0.

    Table 8—Estimated Take Proposed for Authorization

    Common name Estimated take Proposed authorized take Abundance Percent of abundance
    Level B Level A Level B
    Blue Whale 1 0 1 150 0.37
    Bryde's Whale 3 0 3 1,596 0.21
    Fin Whale 1 0 1 46 1.44
    Humpback Whale 10 0 10 2,673 0.37
    Minke Whale 2 0 2 450 0.37
    Sei Whale 1 0 2 821 0.24
    Omura's Whale 0 0 1 160 0.63
    Sperm Whale 25 0 25 5,146 0.48
    Dwarf Sperm Whale 45 3 48 27,395 0.17
    Pygmy Sperm Whale 18 1 19 11,168 0.17
    Blainville's Beaked Whale 8 0 8 3,376 0.23
    Cuvier's Beaked Whale 41 0 41 2,642 1.56
    Longman's Beaked Whale 3 0 3 11,253 0.02
    Ginko-Toothed Beaked Whale 21 0 21 7,567 0.16
    Deraniyagala's Beaked Whale
    False Killer Whale 6 0 10 4,218 0.24
    Killer Whale 1 0 5 253 1.98
    Melon-Headed Whale 30 0 95 16,551 0.57
    Pygmy Killer Whale 1 0 6 527 1.14
    Short-Finned Pilot Whale 23 0 23 6,583 0.04
    Bottlenose Dolphin 9 0 9 1,076 0.79
    Fraser's Dolphin 28 0 28 76,476 0.04
    Pantropical Spotted Dolphin 125 0 125 85,755 0.15
    Risso's Dolphin 5 0 27 17,184 0.16
    Rough-Toothed Dolphin 20 0 20 1,815 1.13
    Spinner Dolphin 21 0 98 5,232 1.87
    Striped Dolphin 65 0 65 24,528 0.26
    Requested take authorization for marine mammals is Level A plus Level B calculated takes.
    All takes are assumed to be from the Western North Pacific DPS.
    Takes have been increased to mean group size for the Mariana Islands based on Fulling et al. (2011) where available or for Hawaii ( e.g., Risso's dolphin and killer whale) as reported by Bradford et al. (2017), or Jefferson et al. (2015).