Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Marine Site Characterization Surveys Off Rhode Island and Massachusetts

Download PDF
Federal RegisterAug 21, 2024
89 Fed. Reg. 67597 (Aug. 21, 2024)
Document Headings

Document headings vary by document type but may contain the following:

  • the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
  • the number of the CFR title and the number of each part the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly related to
  • the agency docket number / agency internal file number
  • the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions
  • See the Document Drafting Handbook for more details.

    Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  • [RTID 0648-XE160]
  • AGENCY:

    National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

    ACTION:

    Notice; proposed incidental harassment authorization; request for comments on proposed authorization and possible renewal.

    SUMMARY:

    NMFS has received a request from Bay State Wind, LLC (Bay State Wind), for authorization to take marine mammals incidental to marine site characterization surveys off the coast of Rhode Island and Massachusetts in the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) Commercial Lease of Submerged Lands for Renewable Energy Development on the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Lease Area OCS-A 0500 and the associated export cable route (ECR) area. Pursuant to the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), NMFS is requesting comments on its proposal to issue an incidental harassment authorization (IHA) to incidentally take marine mammals during the specified activities. NMFS is also requesting comments on a possible one-time, 1-year renewal that could be issued under certain circumstances and if all requirements are met, as described in the Request for Public Comments section at the end of this notice. NMFS will consider public comments prior to making any final decision on the issuance of the requested MMPA authorization and agency responses will be summarized in the final notice of our decision.

    DATES:

    Comments and information must be received no later than September 20, 2024.

    ADDRESSES:

    Comments should be addressed to Jolie Harrison, Chief, Permits and Conservation Division, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service and should be submitted via email to ITP.hilt@noaa.gov. Electronic copies of the application and supporting documents, as well as a list of the references cited in this document, may be obtained online at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/incidental-take-authorizations-other-energy-activities-renewable. In case of problems accessing these documents, please call the contact listed below.

    Instructions: NMFS is not responsible for comments sent by any other method, to any other address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period. Comments, including all attachments, must not exceed a 25-megabyte file size. All comments received are a part of the public record and will generally be posted online at https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/permit/incidental-take-authorizations-under-marine-mammal-protection-act without change. All personal identifying information ( e.g., name, address) voluntarily submitted by the commenter may be publicly accessible. Do not submit confidential business information or otherwise sensitive or protected information.

    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

    Rachel Hilt, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, (301) 427-8401.

    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Background

    The MMPA prohibits the “take” of marine mammals, with certain exceptions. Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct the Secretary of Commerce (as delegated to NMFS) to allow, upon request, the incidental, but not intentional, taking of small numbers of marine mammals by U.S. citizens who engage in a specified activity (other than commercial fishing) within a specified geographical region if certain findings are made and either regulations are proposed or, if the taking is limited to harassment, a notice of a proposed IHA is provided to the public for review.

    Authorization for incidental takings shall be granted if NMFS finds that the taking will have a negligible impact on the species or stock(s) and will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the availability of the species or stock(s) for taking for subsistence uses (where relevant). Further, NMFS must prescribe the permissible methods of taking and other “means of effecting the least practicable adverse impact” on the affected species or stocks and their habitat, paying particular attention to rookeries, mating grounds, and areas of similar significance, and on the availability of the species or stocks for taking for certain subsistence uses (referred to in shorthand as “mitigation”); and requirements pertaining to the monitoring and reporting of the takings. The definitions of all applicable MMPA statutory terms cited above are included in the relevant sections below.

    National Environmental Policy Act

    To comply with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA; 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and NOAA Administrative Order (NAO) 216-6A, NMFS must review our proposed action ( i.e., the issuance of an IHA) with respect to potential impacts on the human environment.

    This action is consistent with categories of activities identified in Categorical Exclusion B4 (IHAs with no anticipated serious injury or mortality) of the Companion Manual for NAO 216-6A, which do not individually or cumulatively have the potential for significant impacts on the quality of the human environment and for which we have not identified any extraordinary circumstances that would preclude this categorical exclusion. Accordingly, NMFS has preliminarily determined that the issuance of the proposed IHA qualifies to be categorically excluded from further NEPA review.

    We will review all comments submitted in response to this notice prior to concluding our NEPA process or making a final decision on the IHA request.

    Summary of Request

    On October 6, 2022, NMFS issued an IHA (87 FR 61575; October 12, 2022) to Ørsted (parent company of Bay State Wind) to take marine mammals incidental to marine site characterization surveys in Lease Areas OCS-A 0486, 0487, 0500 off the coasts from New York to Massachusetts and along potential ECRs to landfall locations between Raritan Bay (part of the New York Bight) and Falmouth, Massachusetts. On May 26, 2023, NMFS received a request for a renewal of that initial IHA because Ørsted's marine site characterization surveys under the initial IHA had not yet been completed and more time was required. The Renewal IHA was issued on September 29, 2023, (88 FR 62337; October 5, 2023). Ørsted has complied with all the requirements ( e.g., mitigation, monitoring, and reporting) of the previous IHAs in Lease Areas OCS-A 0486, 0487, and 0500 (84 FR 52464, October 2, 2019; 85 FR 63508, October 8, 2020; 87 FR 13975, March 11, 2022).

    On March 27, 2024, NMFS received a request from Bay State Wind for an IHA to take marine mammals incidental to conducting marine site characterization surveys off the coast of Rhode Island and Massachusetts only in OCS-A 0500 and the associated ECR area. Following NMFS' review of the application, Bay State Wind submitted a revised version on June 10, 2024. Following NMFS' additional review of the application, Bay State Wind submitted another revised version on July 29, 2024. The application was deemed adequate and complete on August 1, 2024. Bay State Wind's request is for take of 17 species of marine mammals by Level B harassment only. Neither Bay State Wind nor NMFS expect serious injury or mortality to result from this activity and, therefore, an IHA is appropriate.

    Description of Proposed Activity

    Overview

    Bay State Wind proposes to conduct marine site characterization surveys, including high-resolution geophysical (HRG) surveys and geotechnical surveys, in BOEM Lease Area OCS-A 0500, and the associated ECR. The purpose of the marine site characterization surveys is to collect data concerning seabed (geophysical, geotechnical, and geohazard), ecological, and archeological conditions within the footprint of the offshore wind facility development. Surveys are also conducted to support engineering design and to map unexploded ordnance (UXO). Underwater sound resulting from Bay State Wind's proposed activities, specifically HRG surveys, has the potential to result in incidental take of 17 species, in the form of Level B harassment only.

    Dates and Duration

    While the exact dates have not yet been established, the proposed activities are planned to begin as soon as possible upon issuance of an IHA, if appropriate. The proposed activity is expected to require up to 350 survey days across a maximum of four vessels operating concurrently over the course of a single year (“survey day” defined as a 24-hour activity period in which the assumed number of line kilometers (km) are surveyed). Vessel days are defined as the number of days any single vessel is in operation regardless of any other vessel operations ( i.e., if two vessels are working concurrently within the same 24-hour period, each vessel would be counted as having a vessel day for a total of 2 vessel days even though the activity occurs within a single 24-hour period). The number of anticipated survey days was calculated as the number of days needed to reach the overall level of effort required to meet survey objectives assuming any single vessel covers, on average 70 line km per 24-hour operations.

    Specific Geographic Region

    The proposed survey activities will occur within the Lease Area and potential ECRs off the coasts of Rhode Island and Massachusetts (figure 1). Water depths in the Lease Area and potential ECRs extend out from shoreline to approximately 90 meters (m).

    Detailed Description of the Specified Activity

    Bay State Wind proposes to conduct HRG survey operations, including multibeam depth sounding, seafloor imaging, and shallow and medium penetration sub-bottom profiling (SBP). The HRG surveys will include the use of seafloor mapping equipment with operating frequencies above 180 kilohertz (kHz) ( e.g., side-scan sonar (SSS), multibeam echosounders (MBES)); magnetometers and gradiometers that have no acoustic output; and shallow- to medium-penetration SBP equipment ( e.g., parametric sonars, compressed high-intensity radiated pulses (CHIRPs), boomers, sparkers) with operating frequencies below 180 kHz. No deep-penetration SBP surveys ( e.g., airgun or bubble gun surveys) will be conducted. HRG equipment will be deployed from multiple vessels or remotely operated vehicles (ROVs) during the HRG surveys conducted within the Lease Area and potential ECRs. Typically, a survey ROV used for the proposed activities is a tethered platform that carries additional HRG equipment to increase the swath of the survey or the depth at which the equipment can be operated. The equipment deployed from an ROV is identical to the sources deployed from the survey vessel; however, sparker systems are not normally deployed from an ROV due to the power supply required. The extent of ROV usage in this project is unknown at this time, however NMFS expects the use of ROVs to have de minimis impacts relative to the use of vessels given the smaller sources and inherent nature of utilizing an ROV ( e.g., much smaller size of an ROV relative to a vessel and less acoustic exposure given location of their use in the water column). For these reasons, our analysis focuses on the acoustic sources themselves and the use of vessels to deploy such sources, rather than the specific use of ROVs to deploy the survey equipment. Therefore, ROVs are not further analyzed in this notice.

    Acoustic sources planned for use during HRG survey activities proposed by Bay State Wind for which sound levels have the potential to result in Level B harassment of marine mammals include the following:

    • Medium penetration SBPs (boomers) are used to map deeper subsurface stratigraphy as needed. A boomer is a broad-band sound source operating in the 3.5 Hz to 10 kHz frequency range. This system is commonly mounted on a sled and towed behind the vessel. Boomers are impulsive and mobile sources; and,
    • Medium penetration SBPs (sparkers) are used to map deeper subsurface stratigraphy as needed. Sparkers create acoustic pulses from 50 Hz to 4 kHz omnidirectionally from the source, and are considered to be impulsive and mobile sources. Sparkers are typically towed behind the vessel with adjacent hydrophone arrays to receive the return signals.

    Operation of the following survey equipment types is not reasonably expected to result in take of marine mammals and will not be discussed further beyond the brief summaries provided below:

    • Parametric SBPs, also commonly referred to as sediment echosounders, are used to provide high data density in sub-bottom profiles that are typically required for cable routes, very shallow water, and archaeological surveys. Parametric SPBs are typically mounted on a pole, either over the side of the vessel or through a moon pool in the bottom of the hull. Crocker and Fratantonio (2016) does not provide relevant measurements or source data for parametric SBPs, however, some source information is provided by the manufacturer. For the proposed project, the SBP used would generate short, very narrow-beam (1 to 3.5°) sound pulses at relatively high frequencies (generally around 85 to 100 kHz). The narrow beam width significantly reduces the potential for exposure while the high frequencies of the source are rapidly attenuated in seawater. Given the narrow beam width and relatively high frequency. NMFS does not reasonably expect there to be potential for marine mammals to be exposed to the signal;
    • Ultra-short baseline (USBL) positioning systems are used to provide high accuracy ranges by measuring the time between the acoustic pulses transmitted by vessel transceiver and a transponder (or beacon) necessary to produce the acoustic profile. It is a two-component system with a moon-pool- or side-pole-mounted transceiver and one or several transponders mounted on other survey equipment. USBLs are expected to produce extremely small acoustic propagation distances in their typical operating configuration;
    • MBES are used to determine water depths and general bottom topography. MBES sonar systems project sonar pulses in several angled beams from a transducer mounted to a ship's hull. The beams radiate out from the transducer in a fan-shaped pattern orthogonally to the ship's direction. All of the proposed MBESs have operating frequencies >180 kHz and, therefore, are outside the general hearing range of marine mammals; and,
    • SSSs are used for seabed sediment classification purposes and to identify natural and man-made acoustic targets on the seafloor. The sonar device emits conical or fan-shaped pulses down toward the seafloor in multiple beams at a wide angle, perpendicular to the path of the sensor through the water column. All of the proposed SSSs have operating frequencies >180 kHZ and, therefore, are outside the general hearing range of marine mammals.

    Table 1 identifies representative survey equipment with the expected potential to result in exposure of marine mammals and thus potentially result in take. The make and model of the listed geophysical equipment may vary depending on availability and the final equipment choices will vary depending upon the final survey design, vessel availability, and survey contractor selection.

    Table 1—Summary of Representative HRG Survey Equipment

    Representative equipment type Operating frequency ranges (kHz) SL (SPL dB re 1µPa m) SL (SEL dB re 1µPa m s) SL (PK dBre 1µPa m) Beamwidth ranges (degree) Pulse duration (width) (millisecond) Repetition rate (Hz)
    Impulsive, Medium Sub-Bottom Profilers (Sparkers & Boomers)
    AA, Dura-spark UHD Sparker (400 tips, 500 J) 0.3-1.2 203 174 211 180 1.1 4
    AA, Dura-spark UHD Sparker Model 400 × 400 0.3-1.2 203 174 211 180 1.1 4
    GeoMarine, Dual 400 Sparker, Model GeoSource 800 0.4-5 203 174 211 180 1.1 2
    GeoMarine Sparker, Model GeoSource 200-400 0.3-1.2 203 174 211 180 1.1 4
    GeoMarine Sparker, Model GeoSource 200 Lightweight 0.3-1.2 203 174 211 180 1.1 4
    AA, triple plate SBoom (700-1,000 J) 0.1-5 205 172 211 80 0.6 4
    The Dura-spark measurements and specifications provided in Crocker and Fratantonio (2016) were used for all sparker systems proposed for the survey. The data provided in Crocker and Fratantonio (2016) represent the most applicable data for similar sparker systems with comparable operating methods and settings when manufacturer or other reliable measurements are not available. Bay State Wind expects all equipment to operate at a comparable Joule-to-tip ratio as the 400 tip 500 J Dura-spark measured by Crocker and Fratantonio (2016) such that the proxy source levels provided in table 3 are realistically representative of sound levels that may be produced during sparker operations for the proposed survey.
    The AA Dura-spark (500 J, 400 tips) was used as a proxy source for all proposed sparkers to represent the highest potential source level anticipated during the proposed survey. Though the power settings and number of tips may vary among of the sparker systems, all systems will operate with a comparable Joule-to-tip ratio which, as discussed above in section 1.3 of the Application, influences the source levels more than just power setting. Additionally, the survey would not utilize higher-powered sparker systems operating at ≥2,000 J so Dura-spark (500 J, 400 tips) is considered the best available proxy for source levels for these equipment.
    Crocker and Fratantonio (2016) provide S-Boom measurements using two different power sources (CSP-D700 and CSP-N). The CSP-D700 power source was used in the 700 J measurements but not in the 1,000 J measurements. The CSP-N source was measured for both 700 J and 1,000 J operations but resulted in a lower SL; therefore, the single maximum SL value was used for both operational levels of the S-Boom.

    Table 2—Species Likely Impacted by the Specified Activities

    Common name Scientific name Stock ESA/MMPA status; strategic (Y/N) Stock abundance (CV, N min , most recent abundance survey) PBR Annual M/SI
    Order Cetartiodactyla—Cetacea—Superfamily Mysticeti (baleen whales)
    N Atlantic Right Whale Eubalaena glacialis Western Atlantic E, D, Y 340 (0, 337, 2021) 0.7 27.2
    Humpback Whale Megaptera novaeangliae Gulf of Maine -, -, N 1,396 (0, 1380, 2016) 22 12.15
    Fin Whale Balaenoptera physalus Western North Atlantic E, D, Y 6,802 (0.24, 5,573, 2021) 11 2.05
    Sei Whale Balaenoptera borealis Nova Scotia E, D, Y 6,292 (1.02, 3,098, 2021) 6.2 0.6
    Minke Whale Balaenoptera acutorostrata Canadian Eastern Coastal -, -, N 21,968 (0.31, 17,002, 2021) 170 9.4
    Order Cetartiodactyla—Cetacea—Superfamily Odontoceti (toothed whales, dolphins, and porpoises)
    Sperm Whale Physeter macrocephalus North Atlantic E, D, Y 5,895 (0.29, 4,639, 2021) 9.28 0.2
    Long-Finned Pilot Whale Globicephala melas Western North Atlantic -, -, N 39,215 (0.30, 30,627, 2021) 306 5.7
    Striped Dolphin Stenella coeruleoalba Western North Atlantic -, -, N 48,274 (0.29, 38,040, 2021) 529 0
    Atlantic White-Sided Dolphin Lagenorhynchus acutus Western North Atlantic -, -, N 93,233 (0.71, 54,443, 2021) 544 28
    Bottlenose Dolphin Tursiops truncatus Western North Atlantic Offshore -, -, N 64,587 (0.24, 52,801, 2021) 507 28
    Common Dolphin Delphinus delphis Western North Atlantic -, -, N 93,100 (0.56, 59,897, 2021) 1,452 414
    Atlantic Spotted Dolphin Stenella frontalis Western North Atlantic -, -, N 31,506 (0.28, 25,042, 2021) 250 0
    Risso's Dolphin Grampus griseus Western North Atlantic -, -, N 44,067 (0.19, 30,662, 2021) 307 18
    White-Beaked Dolphin Lagenorhynchus albirostris Western North Atlantic -, -, N 536,016 (0.31, 415,344, 2016) 4,153 0
    Harbor Porpoise Phocoena phocoena Gulf of Maine/Bay of Fundy -, -, N 85,765 (0.53, 56,420, 2021) 649 145
    Order Carnivora—Superfamily Pinnipedia
    Harbor Seal Phoca vitulina Western North Atlantic -, -, N 61,336 (0.08, 57,637, 2018) 1,729 339
    Gray Seal Halichoerus grypus Western North Atlantic -, -, N 27,911 (0.20, 23,624, 2021) 1,512 4,570
    Information on the classification of marine mammal species can be found on the web page for The Society for Marine Mammalogy's Committee on Taxonomy ( https://marinemammalscience.org/science-and-publications/list-marine-mammal-species-subspecies ).
    ESA status: Endangered (E), Threatened (T)/MMPA status: Depleted (D). A dash (-) indicates that the species is not listed under the ESA or designated as depleted under the MMPA. Under the MMPA, a strategic stock is one for which the level of direct human-caused mortality exceeds PBR or which is determined to be declining and likely to be listed under the ESA within the foreseeable future. Any species or stock listed under the ESA is automatically designated under the MMPA as depleted and as a strategic stock.
    NMFS marine mammal stock assessment reports online at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/marine-mammal-stock-assessment-reports-region. CV is coefficient of variation; N min is the minimum estimate of stock abundance.
    These values, found in NMFS's SARs, represent annual levels of human-caused mortality plus serious injury from all sources combined ( e.g., commercial fisheries, ship strike). Annual M/SI often cannot be determined precisely and is in some cases presented as a minimum value or range. A CV associated with estimated mortality due to commercial fisheries is presented in some cases.
    The current SAR includes an estimated population (N best 340) based on sighting history through December 2021 (NMFS, 2024). In October 2023, NMFS released a technical report identifying that the North Atlantic right whale population size based on sighting history through 2022 was 356 whales, with a 95 percent credible interval ranging from 346 to 363 (Linden, 2023). Total annual average observed North Atlantic right whale mortality during the period 2017-2021 was 7.1 animals and annual average observed fishery mortality was 4.6 animals. Numbers presented in this table (27.2 total mortality and 17.6 fishery mortality) are 2016-2020 estimated annual means, accounting for undetected mortality and serious injury.
    Key uncertainties exist in the population size estimate for this species, including uncertain separation between short-finned and long-finned pilot whales, small negative bias due to lack of abundance estimate in the region between US and the Newfoundland/Labrador survey area, and uncertainty due to unknown precision and accuracy of the availability bias correction factor that was applied.
    Estimates may include sightings of the coastal form,
    NMFS' stock abundance estimate (and associated PBR value) applies to the U.S. population only. Total stock abundance (including animals in Canada) is approximately 394,311. The annual M/SI value given is for the total stock.

    Table 3—Marine Mammal Hearing Groups

    [NMFS, 2018]

    Hearing group Generalized hearing range *
    Low-frequency (LF) cetaceans (baleen whales) 7 Hz to 35 kHz.
    Mid-frequency (MF) cetaceans (dolphins, toothed whales, beaked whales, bottlenose whales) 150 Hz to 160 kHz.
    High-frequency (HF) cetaceans (true porpoises, Kogia, river dolphins, Cephalorhynchid, Lagenorhynchus cruciger & L. australis) 275 Hz to 160 kHz.
    Phocid pinnipeds (PW) (underwater) (true seals) 50 Hz to 86 kHz.
    Otariid pinnipeds (OW) (underwater) (sea lions and fur seals) 60 Hz to 39 kHz.
    * Represents the generalized hearing range for the entire group as a composite ( i.e., all species within the group), where individual species' hearing ranges are typically not as broad. Generalized hearing range chosen based on ~65-dB threshold from normalized composite audiogram, with the exception for lower limits for LF cetaceans (Southall et al. 2007) and PW pinniped (approximation).

    Table 4—Thresholds Identifying the Onset of Permanent Threshold Shift

    Hearing group PTS onset acoustic thresholds * (received level)
    Impulsive Non-impulsive
    Low-Frequency (LF) Cetaceans Cell 1: L pk,flat : 219 dB; L E,LF,24h : 183 dB Cell 2: L E,LF,24h : 199 dB.
    Mid-Frequency (MF) Cetaceans Cell 3: L pk,flat : 230 dB; L E,MF,24h : 185 dB Cell 4: L E,MF,24h : 198 dB.
    High-Frequency (HF) Cetaceans Cell 5: L pk,flat : 202 dB; L E,HF,24h : 155 dB Cell 6: L E,HF,24h : 173 dB.
    Phocid Pinnipeds (PW) (Underwater) Cell 7: L pk,flat : 218 dB; L E,PW,24h : 185 dB Cell 8: L E,PW,24h : 201 dB.
    Otariid Pinnipeds (OW) (Underwater) Cell 9: L pk,flat : 232 dB; L E,OW,24h : 203 dB Cell 10: L E,OW,24h : 219 dB.
    * Dual metric acoustic thresholds for impulsive sounds: Use whichever results in the largest isopleth for calculating PTS onset. If a non-impulsive sound has the potential of exceeding the peak sound pressure level thresholds associated with impulsive sounds, these thresholds should also be considered.
    Note: Peak sound pressure ( L pk ) has a reference value of 1 µPa, and cumulative sound exposure level ( L E ) has a reference value of 1µPa s. In this table, thresholds are abbreviated to reflect American National Standards Institute standards (American National Standards Institute, 2013). However, peak sound pressure is defined by ANSI as incorporating frequency weighting, which is not the intent for this Technical Guidance. Hence, the subscript “flat” is being included to indicate peak sound pressure should be flat weighted or unweighted within the generalized hearing range. The subscript associated with cumulative sound exposure level thresholds indicates the designated marine mammal auditory weighting function (LF, MF, and HF cetaceans, and PW and OW pinnipeds) and that the recommended accumulation period is 24 hours. The cumulative sound exposure level thresholds could be exceeded in a multitude of ways ( i.e., varying exposure levels and durations, duty cycle). When possible, it is valuable for action proponents to indicate the conditions under which these acoustic thresholds will be exceeded.

    Table 5—Distance to Level B Harassment Thresholds

    [160 dB rms]

    Source Distance to Level B harassment threshold (m)
    Boomers 76
    Sparkers 141

    Table 6—Average Annual Marine Mammal Density Estimates

    Species Average annual density (km )
    Low-frequency Cetaceans
    Fin whale 0.0022
    Sei whale 0.0006
    Minke whale 0.0056
    Humpback whale 0.0014
    North Atlantic right whale 0.0022
    Mid-frequency cetaceans
    Sperm whale 0.0002
    Atlantic white-sided dolphin 0.0143
    Atlantic spotted dolphin 0.0006
    Common bottlenose dolphin (Offshore) 0.0093
    Long-finned pilot whale 0.0016
    Risso's dolphin 0.0006
    Common dolphin 0.0846
    Striped dolphin 0.0000
    White-beaked dolphin 0.0000
    High-frequency Cetaceans
    Harbor porpoise 0.0423
    Pinnipeds
    Gray seal 0.0845
    Harbor seal 0.0845
    Seal species are not separated in the Roberts (2022) data therefore densities were evenly split between the two species expected to occur in the Lease Area and potential ECRs.

    Table 7—Total Estimated and Requested Take Numbers

    [By Level B harassment only]

    Species Abundance Estimated Level B takes Requested Level B takes Max percent population
    Low-frequency Cetaceans
    Fin whale 6,802 15 15 0.22
    Sei whale 6,292 4 4 0.06
    Minke whale 21,968 39 39 0.18
    Humpback whale 1,396 10 10 0.72
    North Atlantic right whale 340 15 15 4.41
    Mid-frequency Cetaceans
    Sperm whale 5,895 2 2 0.03
    Atlantic white-sided dolphin 93,233 99 99 0.11
    Atlantic spotted dolphin 31,506 4 4 0.01
    Common bottlenose dolphin (offshore stock) 64,587 65 65 0.10
    Long-finned pilot whale 39,215 11 11 0.03
    Risso's dolphin 44,067 4 4 (14) 0.03
    Common dolphin 93,100 586 586 (1,485) 1.60
    Striped dolphin 48,274 0 0 (46) 0.10
    White-beaked dolphin 536,016 0 0 (12) 0.00
    High-frequency Cetaceans
    Harbor porpoise 85,765 293 293 0.34
    Pinnipeds
    Seals:
    Gray seal 27,911 586 586 2.10
    Harbor seal 61,336 586 586 0.96