Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC Relating to the Equity Options Monthly Cap

Download PDF
Federal RegisterMar 29, 2011
76 Fed. Reg. 17468 (Mar. 29, 2011)
March 23, 2011.

Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”) and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, notice is hereby given that on March 17, 2011, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (“Phlx” or “Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.

17 CFR 240.19b-4.

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

The Exchange proposes to amend the Exchange's Fee Schedule to lower the monthly cap applicable to Registered Options Traders (“ROTs”) and Specialists for equity options transactions. The Exchange also proposes to assess a $0.05 per contract fee on ROTs and Specialists in certain circumstances when they have reached the monthly cap.

A Registered Options Trader (“ROT”) includes a Streaming Quote Trader (“SQT”), a Remote Streaming Quote Trader (“RSQT”) and a Non-SQT ROT, which by definition is neither a SQT or a RSQT. A ROT is defined in Exchange Rule 1014(b) as a regular member or a foreign currency options participant of the Exchange located on the trading floor who has received permission from the Exchange to trade in options for his own account. See Exchange Rule 1014(b)(i) and (ii).

A Specialist is an Exchange member who is registered as an options specialist pursuant to Rule 1020(a).

While changes to the Fee Schedule pursuant to this proposal are effective upon filing, the Exchange has designated these changes to be operative on April 1, 2011.

The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site at http://nasdaqtrader.com/micro.aspx?id=PHLXfilings,, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose

The purpose of this rule change is to reduce the monthly transaction fee cap applicable to ROTs and Specialists for equity options transactions (“Monthly Cap”). The Exchange believes that by reducing the Monthly Cap, a greater number of members may benefit from the Monthly Cap and the Exchange will attract additional order flow. In addition, another purpose of this proposed rule change is to establish a $0.05 per contract transaction fee when ROTs and Specialists participate as the contra-side of a Customer complex order execution after they have reached the maximum Monthly Cap. The Exchange proposes this amendment to defray the cost of paying Customer complex order rebates, which attracts additional Customer order flow to the Exchange.

A complex order is any order involving the simultaneous purchase and/or sale of two or more different options series in the same underlying security, priced at a net debit or credit based on the relative prices of the individual components, for the same account, for the purpose of executing a particular investment strategy. Furthermore, a complex order can also be a stock-option order, which is an order to buy or sell a stated number of units of an underlying stock or exchange-traded fund (“ETF”) coupled with the purchase or sale of options contract(s). See Exchange Rule 1080, Commentary .08(a)(i).

The Exchange currently applies a Monthly Cap of $600,000 on equity option transaction fees to ROTs and Specialists, as set forth in Section II of the Exchange's Fee Schedule titled “Equity Options Fees.” The Exchange is proposing to reduce the Monthly Cap from $600,000 to $550,000.

The trading activity of separate ROTs and Specialist member organizations are aggregated in calculating the Monthly Cap if there is at least 75% common ownership between the member organizations.

The Exchange is also proposing to assess ROTs and Specialists a $0.05 per contract transaction fee when such ROTs and Specialists: (i) participate as the contra-side of a Customer complex order; and (ii) have reached the maximum Monthly Cap, which is proposed to be $550,000. The Exchange currently pays a rebate of $0.05 per contract for Customer complex orders that are electronically-delivered and executed against a non-Customer such as a Specialist, ROT, SQT, RSQT, Professional, Firm or Broker-Dealer, contra-side complex order or if any of the components of such Customer complex order are executed against a non-Customer individual order or quote. The Exchange proposes this fee to defray the cost of the aforementioned rebate. The $.05 per contract transaction fee would only apply to those contracts that are executed after the affected ROT or Specialist has reached the Monthly Cap. For example, when a ROT or Specialist exceeds the proposed $550,000 Monthly Cap, a $0.05 per contract fee would be added to the Monthly Cap over those trades that were counted in reaching the $550,000 Monthly Cap, when such ROT or Specialist is on the contra-side of a Customer complex order. The ROT or Specialist would not be assessed the $0.05 per contract fee until the Monthly Cap is exceeded. The Exchange proposes to amend the current language in the Fee Schedule at Section II to reflect the proposal. The Exchange also proposes to make certain typographical and conforming changes to Section II of the Fee Schedule to make the language consistent in that section.

An SQT is defined in Exchange Rule 1014(b)(ii)(A) as an ROT who has received permission from the Exchange to generate and submit option quotations electronically in options to which such SQT is assigned.

A RSQT is defined in Exchange Rule in 1014(b)(ii)(B) as an ROT that is a member or member organization with no physical trading floor presence who has received permission from the Exchange to generate and submit option quotations electronically in options to which such RSQT has been assigned. An RSQT may only submit such quotations electronically from off the floor of the Exchange.

The Exchange defines a “professional” as any person or entity that (i) is not a broker or dealer in securities, and (ii) places more than 390 orders in listed options per day on average during a calendar month for its own beneficial account(s) (hereinafter “Professional”).

See Exchange's Fee Schedule at Section II, Equity Options Fees.

2. Statutory Basis

The Exchange believes that its proposal to amend its Fee Schedule is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act in particular, in that it is an equitable allocation of reasonable fees and other charges among Exchange members and other persons using its facilities.

15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).

The Exchange believes that the proposal to lower the Monthly Cap is reasonable because it lowers potential transaction fees for ROTs and Specialist providing liquidity on the Exchange.

The Exchange believes that the proposal to lower the Monthly Cap is equitable because it would uniformly apply to all ROTs and Specialists transacting equity options.

The Exchange believes that assessing a $0.05 per contract fee on ROTs and Specialists who have reached the Monthly Cap and are on the contra-side of a Customer complex order is reasonable because it would serve to defray the cost of paying the Customer complex order rebate, which is offered in certain circumstances. The Customer complex order rebate serves to attract Customer order flow to the Exchange, thereby benefiting all market participants.

The Exchange believes that assessing a $0.05 per contract fee on ROTs and Specialists who have reached the Monthly Cap and are on the contra-side of a Customer complex order is equitable because this fee would only be assessed once the Monthly Cap is reached and will uniformly apply to all ROTs and Specialists that have reached the Monthly Cap. In addition, this proposed transaction fee is based upon the $0.05 per contract fee that the Exchange currently assesses Firms who have reached the Firm Related Equity Option Cap and are on the contra-side of a Customer complex order.

See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62518 (July 16, 2010), 75 FR 43219 (July 23, 2010) (SR-Phlx-2010-90). See also the Exchange's Fee Schedule at Section II, Equity Options Fees.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action

The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

  • Use the Commission's Internet comment form ( http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml ); or
  • Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include File Number SR-Phlx-2011-36 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

  • Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2011-36. This file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site ( http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/shtml ). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File No. SR-Phlx-2011-36 and should be submitted on or before April 19, 2011.

For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.

Cathy H. Ahn,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2011-7282 Filed 3-28-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P