Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed Income Clearing Corporation; Notice of Filing of Partial Amendment No. 1 to Proposed Rule Change To Modify the GSD Rules (i) Regarding the Separate Calculation, Collection and Holding of Margin for Proprietary Transactions and That for Indirect Participant Transactions, and (ii) To Address the Conditions of Note H to Rule 15c3-3a

October 28, 2024.

On March 14, 2024, Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (“FICC”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) the proposed rule change SR-FICC-2024-007 pursuant to Section 19(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and Rule 19b-4 thereunder to modify FICC's Government Securities Division (“GSD”) Rulebook (“GSD Rules”) to calculate, collect, and hold margin for proprietary transactions of a direct participant separately from margin submitted to FICC by a direct participant on behalf of indirect participants and to address conditions of Note H to Rule 15c3-3a under the Exchange Act (the “Proposed Rule Change”). The Proposed Rule Change was published for public comment in the Federal Register on March 28, 2024. The Commission has received comments regarding the substance of the Proposed Rule Change. The Commission also received a letter from FICC responding to the comments.

On April 24, 2024, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act, the Commission designated a longer period within which to approve, disapprove, or institute proceedings to determine whether to approve or disapprove the Proposed Rule Change. On June 21, 2024, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act, the Commission instituted proceedings to determine whether to approve or disapprove the Proposed Rule Change. On September 18, 2024, the Commission extended the time period for Commission action on the proceedings to determine whether to disapprove the Proposed Rule Change.

On October 25, 2024, FICC filed Partial Amendment No. 1 to the Proposed Rule Change. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Act and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, the Commission is publishing notice of this Partial Amendment No.1 to the Proposed Rule Change as described in Item I below. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on Partial Amendment No. 1 from interested persons.

I. Summary of the Terms of Substance of Partial Amendment No. 1 to the Proposed Rule Change

FICC filed Partial Amendment No. 1 to its previously submitted Proposed Rule Change, which would make several changes to FICC's GSD Rules to (1) provide for FICC to calculate, collect, and hold margin for the proprietary transactions of a Netting Member separately and independently from the margin for transactions that the Netting Member submits to FICC on behalf of indirect participants; (2) simplify and revise the account types through which Members may record transactions at FICC and adopt a new Rule 2B to provide clearer public disclosures through the Rules regarding the GSD account structure; (3) allow Netting Members to elect for margin for indirect participant transactions to be calculated on a gross basis ( i.e., an indirect participant-by-indirect participant basis) and legally segregated from the margin for the Netting Member's proprietary transactions (as well as those of other indirect participants); (4) align FICC's margin calculation methodology with the expanded account types and enhance public disclosure through the Rules of that calculation methodology; and (5) simplify the requirements for brokered transactions so that they only apply to transactions executed by an Inter-Dealer Broker Netting Member on the trading platform offered by that Inter-Dealer Broker Netting Member.

Regarding the changes described in (3) above, Partial Amendment No. 1 makes several changes to the requirements regarding Segregated Customer Margin. First, as originally proposed, the Proposed Rule Change requires FICC to establish and maintain on its books and records a Segregated Customer Margin Custody Account corresponding to each Segregated Indirect Participants Account. Partial Amendment No. 1 deletes and replaces language in Rule 4, Section 1a, requiring Segregated Customer Margin credited to a Segregated Customer Margin Custody Account to be used exclusively to settle and margin Transactions in U.S. Treasury securities recorded in the corresponding Segregated Indirect Participants Account, with language requiring Segregated Customer Margin credited to a Segregated Customer Margin Custody Account to secure Transactions recorded in the corresponding Segregated Indirect Participants Account and satisfy payment and delivery obligations owning to the Corporation (including liquidating or otherwise using such Segregated Customer Margin to obtain relevant cash or securities) in connection with a default in respect of such Transactions.

Similarly, Partial Amendment No. 1 deletes and replaces language in Rule 4, Section 5 regarding the use of Clearing Fund and Segregated Customer Margin requiring FICC to only use the portion of Segregated Customer Margin that supports each Segregated Indirect Participant's Transactions. The Proposed Rule Change stated that FICC could use that portion to secure or settle the obligations of that Segregated Indirect Participant, and of the Sponsoring Member or Agent Clearing Member with respect to the obligations of that Segregated Indirect Participant, whereas Partial Amendment No. 1 replaces this language to state that FICC may only use that portion of Segregated Customer Margin to secure the Transactions of that Segregated Indirect Participant recorded in the corresponding Segregated Indirect Participants Account and satisfy payment and delivery obligations owing to FICC (including liquidating or otherwise using such Segregated Customer Margin to obtain relevant cash or securities) in connection with a default in respect of such Transactions. Additionally, Partial Amendment No 1. clarifies language in that portion of Rule 4 regarding FICC's prohibition on using Segregated Customer Margin from one Segregated Indirect Participant's Transactions to secure or settle another Segregated Indirect Participant's Transaction by deleting reference to the term “settle” and replacing with satisfying payment or delivery obligations in connection with another Segregated Indirect Participant's Transaction.

Second, as originally proposed, the Proposed Rule Change requires FICC to hold all Segregated Customer Margin in an account at a bank within the meaning of the Exchange Act that is insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, which account shall be segregated from any other account of the Corporation and used exclusively to hold Segregated Customer Margin. Additionally, the Proposed Rule Change requires Segregated Customer Margin to be subject to a written notice of the bank or Federal Reserve Bank provided to and retained by the Corporation that the Segregated Customer Margin in the account is being held by the bank or Federal Reserve Bank pursuant to SEC Rule 15c3-3 and is being kept separate from any other accounts maintained by the Corporation or any other person at the bank or Federal Reserve Bank. Partial Amendment No. 1 revises the Proposed Rule Change to insert text that clarifies that FICC shall not only hold Segregated Customer Margin in an account of FICC at a bank within the meaning of the Exchange Act that is insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, but shall also hold Segregated Customer Margin in an account at a bank that is also a qualified custodian under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. Additionally, the Proposed Rule Change inserts text that clarifies that not only is each account holding Segregated Customer Margin being held by a bank or Federal Reserve Bank pursuant to SEC Rule 15c3-3 is being kept separate from any other accounts maintained by FICC or any other person at the bank or Federal Reserve Bank, but also requires these accounts to not be commingled with any other accounts maintained by FICC or any other persona at the bank or Federal Reserve Bank.

Third, as originally proposed, the Proposed Rule Change requires any interest earned on Segregated Customer Margin to be paid by FICC to the Netting Member. Partial Amendment No. 1 inserts language to clarify that any interest earned on Segregated Customer Margin consisting of cash shall be paid to the Netting Member for the benefit of, and as agent for, its Segregated Indirect Participants.

Fourth, as originally proposed, the Proposed Rule Change would apply three requirements to each Segregated Customer Margin Requirement for a particular Segregated Indirect Participants Account: (1) A minimum of 40 percent of the Segregated Customer Margin Requirement for such Account shall be satisfied with cash and/or Eligible Clearing Fund Treasury Securities; (2) the lesser of $5,000,000 or 10 percent of the Segregated Customer Margin Requirement for the Account must be made and maintained in cash; and (3) a minimum of the product of $1 million and the number of Segregated Indirect Participants whose Transactions are recorded in such Segregated Indirect Participants Account must be made and maintained in cash. Partial Amendment No. 1 would revise the Proposed Rule Change by deleting the second requirement regarding the lesser of $5,000,000 or 10 percent of the Segregated Customer Margin Requirement for the Account must be made and maintained in cash.

Fifth, as originally proposed, FICC had the discretion to retain some or all of the Excess Segregated Customer Margin if the Member had an outstanding payment or margin obligation to FICC with respect to the Transactions of any Segregated Indirect Participant. Partial Amendment No. 1 would revise the Proposed Rule Change by adding text that clarifies the FICC shall not retain the Excess Segregated Customer Margin with respect to the Transactions of a Segregated Indirect Participant when they have determined, in their sole discretion, that such outstanding payment or margin obligation is unrelated to the Transactions of that Segregated Indirect Participant.

Sixth, Partial Amendment No. 1 would make the following change to the Margin Component Schedule in the Proposed Rule Change regarding Segregated Customer Margin Requirement Calculations. As originally proposed, each Segregated Indirect Participant would be required to deposit in the Segregated Indirect Participants Account Required Fund Deposit the greater of the (i) the sum of the Unadjusted GSD Margin Portfolio Amount and all applicable additional charges; and (ii) a minimum charge of $1 million. Partial Amendment No. 1 would revise the Proposed Rule Change by inserting text to clarify that FICC may, in its sole discretion, adjust the minimum charge of $1 million in the Segregated Indirect Participants Account Required Fund Deposit if FICC determines that a different minimum charge would be appropriate and consistent with achieving its backtesting coverage target and that Members would be notified of any such adjustment by an Important Notice.

Seventh, Partial Amendment No. 1 would add text to Rule 3A, Section 3, as proposed to be amended by SR-FICC-2024-005, to state that a Sponsored Member may be a series of a limited liability company, statutory trust, or other legal entity.

Regarding the changes described in (4) above, Partial Amendment No. 1 would add language to clarify how the definition of Current Net Settlement Position relates to Sponsored GC Trades and that the definition does not refer to calculating the Net Settlement Position under Rule 11. As originally proposed, the definition stated that, if a Current Net Settlement Position recorded in a Sponsoring Member Omnibus Account or Segregated Indirect Participants Account is not clearly allocable to an individual Sponsored Member or Segregated Indirect Participant, including because one or more transactions recorded in the Account did not settle on its original Scheduled Settlement Date, then, for purposes of calculating the relevant Netting Member's Sponsoring Member Omnibus Account Required Fund Deposit or Segregated Customer Margin Requirement for such Account, FICC shall allocate the positions in the manner specified. In Partial Amendment No. 1, the definition states if a Current Net Settlement Position recorded in a Sponsoring Member Omnibus Account or Segregated Indirect Participants Account is not clearly allocable to an individual Sponsored Member or Segregated Indirect Participant, including because one or more transactions (other than Sponsored GC Trades) recorded in the Account did not settle on its original Scheduled Settlement Date (such failure to settle would not occur with respect to Sponsored GC Trades), then, for purposes of calculating the relevant Netting Member's Sponsoring Member Omnibus Account Required Fund Deposit or Segregated Customer Margin Requirement for such Account and not for purposes of calculating the Net Settlement Position under Rule 11, FICC shall allocate the positions in the manner specified.

Regarding the changes described in (5) above, Partial Amendment No. 1 makes several changes to the Proposed Rule Change and existing rules regarding the use of the term Brokered Transactions, including changes to its definition. Specifically, Partial Amendment No. 1 would delete and add text to the definition of Brokered Transaction to clarify that a Brokered Transaction means the side of a transaction, including a Repo Transaction, that is submitted to the Corporation for Novation by an Inter-Dealer Broker Netting Member calling for the delivery of an Eligible Netting Security, or the posting of cash or an Eligible Netting Security as collateral, that such Inter-Dealer Broker Netting Member enters into with another Netting Member or a Sponsored Member or Executing Firm Customer through the Inter-Dealer Broker Netting Member's own trading platform. As initially proposed, the definition of Brokered Transaction referred only to any transaction, including a Repo Transaction, calling for the delivery of an Eligible Netting Security, or the posting of cash or an Eligible Netting Security as collateral.

Partial Amendment No. 1 also revises text proposed in SR-FICC-2024-005 regarding the treatment of Agent Clearing Transactions and deletes reference to the term Brokered Transactions, such that Brokered Transactions would not be excluded from being an Agent Clearing Transaction.

Additionally, Partial Amendment No. 1 makes the following changes to delete references to the term Brokered Transactions: (i) amends text from the Proposed Rule Change regarding Rule 1, to remove the term Brokered Transactions from the definition of Dealer Account; (ii) revises Rule 4, Section 7 regarding loss allocation for Inter-Dealer Broker Netting Members, to replace a reference to a Segregated Repo Account, with a reference to a Broker Account, and to remove a reference to a Non-IDB Repo Broker, as the Proposed Rule Change deletes the use of that term from the Rules; and (iii) amends existing Rule 3A Section 5 regarding Sponsored Member Trades and deletes reference to the term Brokered Transactions, such that the text now states that Sponsored Member Trades (other than Sponsored GC Trades) may be any type of transaction eligible for submission to FICC for netting with the exception of Netting Eligible Auction Purchases and GCF Repo Transactions.

Finally, Partial Amendment No. 1 makes several technical and conforming changes throughout the Proposed Rule Change, such as renumbering section numbers to reflect the addition of new sections.

Partial Amendment No. 1 would not change the purpose of, or statutory basis for the proposed rule change. All other representations in the Proposed Rule Change remain as stated therein and no other changes are being made.

II. Solicitation of Comments

Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

• Use the Commission's internet comment form ( https://www.sec.gov/rules-regulations/self-regulatory-organization-rulemaking ); or
• Send an email torule-comments@sec.gov. Please include file number SR-FICC-2024-007 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

• Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-FICC-2024-007. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's internet website ( https://www.sec.gov/rules-regulations/self-regulatory-organization-rulemaking ). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of FICC and on DTCC's website at ( https://dtcc.com/legal/sec-rule-filings.aspx ). Do not include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-FICC-2024-007 and should be submitted on or before November 18, 2024.

[FR Doc. 2024-25429 Filed 10-31-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P