Document headings vary by document type but may contain the following:
See the Document Drafting Handbook for more details.
AGENCY:
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION:
Final rule.
SUMMARY:
The Coast Guard is revising regulations associated with the approval, carriage, and maintenance of certain safety equipment required on board vessels and offshore units or facilities. We are taking this action to align these regulations with current industry practice and provide more transparent regulations for the regulated industry. These revisions eliminate outdated requirements, reduce inspection and testing requirements, and update standards incorporated by reference. Additionally, these revisions remove obsolete sections and align conflicting sections with the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea.
DATES:
This final rule is effective October 18, 2024.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in the rule is approved by the Director of the Federal Register beginning October 18, 2024. The incorporation by reference of certain other publications listed in the rule was approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of August 22, 2016.
ADDRESSES:
To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-2020-0519 in the search box and click “Search.” Next, in the Document Type column, select “Supporting & Related Material.”
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For information about this document, call or email Lieutenant Jeff Bors, Lifesaving and Fire Safety Division (CG-ENG-4), U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 571-610-2849, email Jeffrey.S.Bors@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents for Preamble
I. Abbreviations
II. Basis, Purpose, and Regulatory History
III. Background
IV. Discussion of Comments
V. Discussion of the Final Rule and Changes From NPRM
VI. Incorporation by Reference
VII. Regulatory Analyses
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
B. Small Entities
C. Assistance for Small Entities
D. Collection of Information
E. Federalism
F. Unfunded Mandates
G. Taking of Private Property
H. Civil Justice Reform
I. Protection of Children
J. Indian Tribal Governments
K. Energy Effects
L. Technical Standards
M. Environment
I. Abbreviations
ASTM ASTM International
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CG-ENG Coast Guard Office of Design and Engineering Standards
COMDTINST Commandant Instruction
COSPAS Space System for the Search of Vessels in Distress
DHS Department of Homeland Security
EPIRB Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacon
FCC Federal Communications Commission
FR Federal Register
FTP Code Fire Test Procedures Code
IBR Incorporation by reference
IMO International Maritime Organization
ISO International Organization for Standardization
LSA Life-Saving Appliances
MISLE Marine Information for Safety and Law Enforcement
MODU Mobile offshore drilling unit
MSC Maritime Safety Committee
MSHA Mine Safety and Health Administration
NIOSH National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
NFPA National Fire Protection Association
NRTL Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
NVIC Navigation and Vessel Inspection Circular
OCMI Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection
OCS Outer Continental Shelf
OMB Office of Management and Budget
PHS Public Health Service
RTCM Radio Technical Commission for Maritime Services
SARSAT Search and Rescue Satellite-Aided Tracking
SCBA Self-contained breathing apparatus
§ Section
SME Subject matter expert
SOLAS International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea
UL Underwriters Laboratories, Inc.
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Basis, Purpose, and Regulatory History
The statutory authority for these regulations can be found in Title 46 of the United States Code (U.S.C.), Sections 3306 and 3703. The authority to issue regulations, pursuant to these sections, is delegated to the Commandant of the Coast Guard under Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Delegation No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.4, paragraph (II)(92).
Under 46 U.S.C. 3306, the Secretary of DHS is required to prescribe necessary regulations to ensure safety of individuals and property on board vessels subject to inspection. This final rule ensures the proper design, construction, alteration, repair, and operation of vessels subject to inspection.
Under 46 U.S.C. 3703, the Secretary of DHS is required to prescribe regulations for the design, construction, alteration, repair, maintenance, operation, equipping, personnel qualification, and manning of tank and cargo vessels that may be necessary for increased protection against hazards to life and property, navigation and vessel safety, and enhanced protection of the marine environment.
The Coast Guard issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on May 23, 2023, and solicited public comment on the proposed rule during a comment period of 62 days. The comment period closed on July 24, 2023. The Coast Guard received six comment submissions, which are discussed later in this document.
This final rule amends title 33 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), chapter I, subchapters NN, and 46 CFR, chapter I, subchapters A, D, F, H, I, I-A, K, L, N, Q, R, T, U, and W. These subchapters are associated with approving, carrying, and maintaining certain safety equipment required on board vessels and offshore units or facilities. The revisions in this final rule eliminate outdated requirements, reduce inspection and testing requirements, modify submission requirements for equipment approval to allow materials to be submitted electronically, and update standards incorporated by reference. Additionally, this final rule removes numerous obsolete CFR sections and updates other CFR sections to bring them into compliance with the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) and related regulations.
III. Background
The Coast Guard conducted a comprehensive review of regulations regarding the approval, carriage, and maintenance of marine equipment on U.S.-flagged vessels. The Coast Guard continues to review regulations with the following goals: updating references to incorporated standards that have been modified; clarifying language; providing additional regulatory flexibility where possible; minimizing the regulatory burden on affected vessels; and removing obsolete rules to ensure marine equipment requirements are current with emerging technology and industry standards.
IV. Discussion of Comments
In response to the NPRM published on May 23, 2023, we received six written submissions during the comment period. These written submissions are available in the public docket for this rulemaking, where indicated under ADDRESSES , or at the direct link: https://www.regulations.gov/docket/USCG-2020-0519/comments. The Coast Guard appreciates the comments from the public, as these insights continue to inform Coast Guard actions and programs. We summarize the comments and our responses in the paragraphs that follow.
One commenter noted that the proposed changes to 46 CFR 116.400(c) would create an unintentional application of subchapter H's egress requirements found in § 72.05-20 for all subchapter K vessels that use SOLAS Structural Fire Protection requirements as equivalent. The intent of the amendments to § 116.400 was to clarify the egress requirements and not to impose additional egress requirements. All subchapter K vessels that use SOLAS Structural Fire Protection requirements as equivalent must comply with the egress requirements for stairtowers, stairways, ladders, and elevators in § 116.438. In accordance with § 116.438(a), those subchapter K vessels that carry more than 600 passengers or with overnight accommodations for more than 49 passengers must meet the egress requirements in subchapter H for stairtowers, stairways, ladders, and elevators in § 72.05-20. In response to this comment, in § 116.400(c) we removed the direct reference to § 72.05-20 from the proposed rule and added a reference to § 116.438 in this final rule so as not to apply § 72.05-20 to all subchapter K vessels.
A commenter noted the rulemaking's intent to “align the regulations with the current industry practice and provide more transparent regulations for the regulated industry” and suggested revising and updating the regulations for 46 CFR subchapter W. The commenter offered a number of suggestions to revise regulations for Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons (EPIRBs), distress signals, lifebuoys, survival craft, line throwing appliances, and provide clarity to the definitions of accommodation and workstation. The updates to subchapter W in this rule were specifically drafted to align davit maintenance intervals with SOLAS requirements, and not to update regulations in subchapter W in general. Therefore, this commenter's suggestions are outside the scope of this rulemaking. We cannot make those updates in this final rule; however, the Coast Guard acknowledges that the application of subchapter W to barges that are not self-propelled is ambiguous and is working to address it. Additionally, as of July 2023, there is a newly published Change 2 to Navigation and Vessel Inspection Circular (NVIC) 02-81 that has exemptions for life-saving requirements on integrated and articulated tug and barge combinations.
U.S. Coast Guard NVIC 02-81 Ch-2, https://www.dco.uscg.mil/Portals/9/DCO%20Documents/5p/5ps/NVIC/1981/NVIC%2002-81%20Ch.2_CG%20%Inspec%20Guidance20Integrated%20and%20Articulated%20Tug%20&%20Barges.pdf, accessed January 23, 2024.
We received a comment regarding Coast Guard requirements for nonmetallic (plastic) piping used in various engineering systems for different types of vessels. The comment suggested that, because all nonmetallic piping used in the building industry essentially meets the same ASTM International (ASTM) D1784 standard requirements, piping that also meets this standard should be acceptable for use in vessel systems without more requirements from the Coast Guard. The intent of this rule on this particular subject is to remove redundant fire testing requirements for nonmetallic piping, specifically for vessels under 46 CFR subchapter K. A proposal to newly incorporate an industry standard on this subject is beyond the scope of this rulemaking, as piping requirements vary between the regulations applicable to specific vessel types. We note that manufacturers and vessel designers may submit specific material test results for general approval by the Coast Guard, or acceptance to an equivalent level of safety to the CFR for a particular vessel or project. As a result, the Coast Guard made no changes from the proposed rule in response to this comment.
We received a comment that concurred with the proposed edits to 46 CFR 56.60-25(a)(4), but also recommended that § 56.60-25(a)(7) be modified to include other laboratory accreditation bodies for potable water piping. Specifically, the comment recommended inclusion of accreditation entities signatory to the International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation Mutual Recognition Arrangement. The Coast Guard's proposed change to remove repetitive wording was editorial in nature. As the commenter's recommended modification of acceptable accreditation entities is a substantial change that was not considered in the NPRM, we cannot make that change in this final rule; however, the recommendation may be considered for a future rulemaking.
We also received a comment regarding the carpet requirements for vessels under subchapter K in 46 CFR 116.423. The comment stated that the rugs and carpets requirements in § 116.423(a)(4) are applicable to all spaces, not just rooms containing fire resistant furnishings under § 116.423(a) and suggests that the carpet requirements should be its own paragraph, not a subparagraph of § 116.423(a). The Coast Guard acknowledges this comment. It is outside the scope of this rulemaking because this section was not part of the changes proposed in the NPRM. However, we will consider this revision for inclusion in a future rulemaking. For these reasons, we have made no changes from the proposed rule in response to this comment.
We received one comment on the regulatory analysis (RA) related to the affected population for the lifeboats listed in table 2 of the NPRM. The commenter expressed concern that the table did not provide enough clarity to determine if floating Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) facilities were included. We did not include floating OCS facilities in our population of vessels carrying lifeboats because the proposed change is not applicable to floating OCS facilities. We made the recommended changes to reflect the affected population of vessels carrying lifeboats by subchapter, and we listed the affected population by inspection subchapter, for vessels carrying lifeboats, in table 7 of the RA in this final rule.
V. Discussion of the Final Rule and Changes From NPRM
In order to decrease likelihood of introducing errors, to improve efficiency during the publication process, and to meet drafting and formatting requirements for publication, we are revising or revising and republishing several sections and tables, as appropriate. This final rule makes no substantive changes from the NPRM; it makes effective the following changes to various subchapters in titles 33 and 46 of the CFR:
(1) Modifies equipment approval submission requirements to allow for materials to be submitted electronically to typeapproval@uscg.mil, instead of the existing requirement of paper submissions in triplicate;
(2) Removes obsolete regulations for pilot hoists that are no longer allowed on U.S.-flagged vessels;
(3) Allows vessel owners and operators to use a third party to test the properties and quality of their firefighting foam;
(4) Revises the requirements for pressure vacuum relief valves to align with international consensus standards;
(5) Updates requirements for lifeboat and rescue boat releasing mechanisms on board mobile offshore drilling units (MODUs) to allow for lifeboats that serve as rescue boats to carry lifeboat releasing mechanisms. We note that this does not apply to OCS facilities as incorrectly stated in the NPRM;
(6) Removes prescriptive design requirements for lifeboat, rescue boat, and liferaft winch limit switches and aligns requirements with the Life-Saving Appliances (LSA) Code;
(7) Removes a redundant flame-spread testing requirement for nonmetallic piping used in certain vessels;
(8) Revises the “end-for-ending” requirement for launching appliance falls (wire ropes) to align with SOLAS, which allows for a fall replacement interval of 5 years without end-for-ending;
(9) Changes the interval for hydrostatic testing of all inert gas firefighting extinguishing system bottles to align with the hydrostatic testing intervals for carbon dioxide and Halon firefighting extinguishing systems. The interval will change from at least once every 5 or 10 years (depending on bottle size) to once every 12 years;
(10) Removes the Mine Safety and Health Administration's (MSHA) approval requirement for self-contained breathing apparatuses (SCBAs) because MSHA no longer certifies this type of equipment for marine use;
(11) Revises the standards of fire-resistant fiber-reinforced plastic resin used to manufacture survival craft and rescue boats to allow the use of additional international standards;
(12) Removes the requirement for Coast Guard approval of EPIRBs and codifies the current policy in which the Coast Guard reviews test data, instruction manuals, drawings, and specifications of the EPIRB and issues a letter to the manufacturer stating whether the EPIRB satisfies all Radio Technical Commission for Maritime Services (RTCM) Recommended Standards. This aligns with the requirements as set out in 47 CFR 80.1061;
(13) Adds an option for the use of fire detection systems as excess equipment for MODUs and a grandfathering clause for fire extinguishers on board nautical school vessels;
(14) Makes editorial changes to clarify language, correct typographical errors, and delete repetitive words;
(15) Updates incorporations by reference (IBRs), removes outdated IBRs, and revises CFR citations to the correct IBRs;
(16) Corrects errors in fire extinguisher quantities and ratings from a previous rulemaking; and
(17) Clarifies structural fire protection requirements for means of egress on 46 CFR subchapter K vessels.
Table 1 provides a list of the types of changes, summaries of the changes, and the subparts affected by this final rule. Further explanation for each of these categories can be found after the table.
Table 1—Summary of Changes and CFR Subparts and Sections Affected
Equipment involved or type of change | Changes | Affected CFR subparts and sections |
---|---|---|
CFR References and Changes to IBRs | 1. Deletes references to outdated IBRs and corrects improper IBRs in regulation text. 2. Corrects improper CFR references | 46 CFR 115.810(b)(1), 46 CFR 118.500(d), 46 CFR 160.171-3, 46 CFR 160.174-3, 46 CFR 161.002-18(a)(3), 46 CFR 161.002-19(a)(3), 46 CFR 161.002-19(b)(3), 46 CFR 162.017-0, 46 CFR 164.106-3(a), 46 CFR 164.137-2(b)(2), 46 CFR 164.137-3(a), 46 CFR 164.138-2(a), 46 CFR 164.138-2(b)(2), 46 CFR 164.138-3(a), 46 CFR 164.139-2(a), 46 CFR 164.139-2(b)(2), 46 CFR 164.139-3(a). |
Editorial | 1. Clarifies language. 2. Corrects typographical errors. 3. Deletes repetitive words and wording | 33 CFR 149.410, 46 CFR 56.60-25(a)(4), 46 CFR 108.495, 46 CFR subpart 162.017, 46 CFR 181.500(b). |
Electronic Submissions | 1. Adds option to submit equipment approval materials electronically. 2. Removes requirement for multiple copies of submissions for equipment approval, if submitted electronically | 46 CFR 2.75-10(b), 46 CFR 159.001-5, 46 CFR 160.115-9(b), 46 CFR 160.115-13(g)(2), 46 CFR 160.132-9(b), 46 CFR 160.132-13(g)(2), 46 CFR 160.133-9(b), 46 CFR 160.133-13(g)(2), 46 CFR 160.135-9(b), 46 CFR 160.135-13(g)(2), 46 CFR 160.156-9(b), 46 CFR 160.156-13(g)(2), 46 CFR 160.170-9(b), 46 CFR 160.170-13(g)(2), 46 CFR 161.002-18(a), 46 CFR 161.002-19(a)(2), 46 CFR 161.012-5(a), 46 CFR 161.012-5(b)(2), 46 CFR 161.013-11(c)(1), 46 CFR 161.013-17, 46 CFR 162.050-15(a), 46 CFR 162.060-40(b), 46 CFR 164.009-9(a), 46 CFR 164.018-7(a), 46 CFR 164.018-7(b)(2). |
End-for-Ending Launching Appliance Falls | 1. Removes requirement for “end-for-ending” for launching appliance falls, to align with SOLAS. 2. Revises interval for launching appliance falls replacement to 5 years | 46 CFR 109.301(j), 46 CFR 199.190(j) |
EPIRB | Aligns Coast Guard acceptance of EPIRBs in 46 CFR with Federal Communications Commission (FCC) requirements in 47 CFR and standards established by the Space System for the Search of Vessels in Distress (COSPAS), Search and Rescue Satellite-Aided Tracking (SARSAT), and RTCM | 46 CFR 161.011-1, 46 CFR 161.011-5, 46 CFR 161.011-10. |
Equipment Deletion | Deletes pilot hoist approval series, § 163.002 and associated references in various subchapters | 46 CFR 32.90-1(h), 46 CFR 77.40-1(h), 46 CFR 96.40-1(h), 46 CFR 108.719(h), 46 CFR subpart 163.002, 46 CFR 195.40-1(h). |
Fire Protection and Other Conforming Amendments | 1. Corrects fire extinguisher ratings. 2. Clarifies fire extinguisher quantities. 3. Adds option to allow use of nationally recognized testing laboratory (NRTL) listed and labeled fire detection systems as excess equipment for MODUs. 4. Adds grandfathering provision for fire extinguishers for public nautical school ships and sailing school ships | 46 CFR 34.10-90(a)(3), 46 CFR 34.50-10(a), 46 CFR 76.50-10(a), 46 CFR 95.50-10(a), 46 CFR 105.14(a), 46 CFR 108.103, 46 CFR 108.489(a)(3), 46 CFR 118.500(c), 46 CFR 167.45-40, 46 CFR 167.45-65, 46 CFR 167.45-70, 46 CFR 167.45-71, 46 CFR 167.45-75, 46 CFR 169.567(a), 46 CFR 169.568. |
Foam Testing | 1. Adds option for third-party testing for foam concentrates. 2. Aligns testing processes with requirements in SOLAS and Coast Guard Office of Design and Engineering Standards (CG-ENG) Policy Letter 01-20, Third Party Foam Concentrate Analysis | 46 CFR 31.10-18(c), 46 CFR 107.235(b)(4). |
Hydrostatic Testing for Inert Gas Cylinders | Revises hydrostatic testing requirements for inert gas bottles to every 12 years | 46 CFR 147.66(a), 46 CFR 147.66(c). |
MODU Lifesaving Appliance Release Mechanism | 1. Adds an option in 46 CFR subchapter I-A to allow lifeboats also serving as rescue boats to have lifeboat release mechanisms instead of rescue boat release mechanisms. 2. Aligns this regulation with a similar regulation in 46 CFR subchapter W | 46 CFR 108.570(c)(3). |
Nonmetallic Piping | Removes redundant fire testing requirements for nonmetallic piping in 46 CFR subchapter K | 46 CFR 116.405(f). |
Pressure-Vacuum Relief Valves | 1. Revises requirements for approving pressure-vacuum relief valves. 2. Updates IBR edition | 46 CFR 39.1005, 46 CFR 39.2011(b)(1), 46 CFR 162.017-1, 46 CFR 162.017-2, 46 CFR 162.017-3(n), 46 CFR 162.017-3(r), 46 CFR 162.017-6. |
Resins for Lifeboats and Rescue Boats | Removes approval series for fire-retardant resins and incorporates approval of these resins into approvals for lifeboats and rescue boats | 46 CFR 160.135-5(d), 46 CFR 160.135-7(b)(3)(iv)(A), 46 CFR 160.156-5(d), 46 CFR 160.156-7(b)(3)(iv)(A), 46 CFR subpart 164.120. |
Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus | Removes obsolete requirement for MSHA approval for SCBAs | 46 CFR 35.30-20(c)(1), 46 CFR 77.35-5(b), 46 CFR 96.35-5(b), 46 CFR 108.497(a), 46 CFR 132.365(b)(1), 46 CFR 167.45-60(a), 46 CFR 169.717(a)(1). |
Stairwell Structural Fire Protection and Means of Egress | Clarifies the stairwell structural fire protection and means of egress requirements for 46 CFR subchapter K vessels | 46 CFR 116.400(c). |
Winches and Davits | 1. Removes prescriptive design requirements for winch and davit safety devices under the LSA Code. 2. Aligns the safety device requirement with the LSA Code | 46 CFR 160.115-7(b)(6)(vi). |
Table 2—Summary of Changes to the RA From the NPRM to the Final Rule
46 CFR 116.400(c)Description | NPRM | Final rule | Reason for change | Resulting change in RA |
---|---|---|---|---|
Affected population of U.S.-flagged vessels | The Coast Guard estimated that the proposed rule would affect 435 vessels carrying lifeboats. | In the final rule, we revised this estimate to 442 vessels. | Based on public comment, we revised this estimate using a new data pull. | The increase in the affected population of vessels carrying lifeboats increases the cost savings. |
The Coast Guard intended to clarify the stairwell structural fire protection and means of egress requirements for 46 CFR subchapter K vessels. | In the final rule, we revised the referenced citation to eliminate unnecessary case-by-case evaluations for certain vessels. | Based on public comment, we determined the proposed text change unintentionally required case-by-case evaluation for certain vessels. | No impact; clarification. |
Table 3—Summary of Impacts of the Final Rule
Category | Summary |
---|---|
Applicability | Update 33 CFR, chapter I, subchapter NN, and 46 CFR, chapter I, subchapters A, D, F, H, I, I-A, K, L, N, Q, R, T, U, and W. |
Affected Population | 588 U.S.-flagged vessels: • 132 carrying foam fire extinguishing systems, • 14 carrying inert gas bottles, and • 442 carrying lifeboats. |
Costs | There will be no costs to industry or the Federal Government because this final rule reduces burden and generates cost savings. |
Benefits | Provide flexibility by offering third-party testing options for certain safety equipment. Reduce confusion and administrative burdens by (1) removing obsolete regulations, IBRs, and outdated references; and (2) updating standards to align with SOLAS, related regulations, and current industry practice. |
Cost savings (7% discount rate)* | Cost savings to industry: 10-year: $2,532,521. Annualized: $360,574. |
* Totals may not sum due to independent rounding. |
Table 4—Regulatory Changes of the Final Rule by CFR Subparts and Sections
46 CFR 108.570(c)(3)46 CFR 116.405(f)46 CFR 116.400(c)46 CFR 160.115-7(b)(6)(vi)Equipment involved or type of change | Changes | Affected CFR subparts and sections | Economic impact |
---|---|---|---|
CFR References and Changes to IBRs | 1. Deletes references to outdated IBRs and corrects improper IBRs in regulation text. 2. Corrects improper CFR references. | 46 CFR 115.810(b)(1), 46 CFR 118.500(d), 46 CFR 160.171-3, 46 CFR 160.174-3, 46 CFR 161.002-18(a)(3), 46 CFR 161.002-19(a)(3), 46 CFR 161.002-19(b)(3), 46 CFR 162.017-0, 46 CFR 164.106-3(a), 46 CFR 164.137-2(b)(2), 46 CFR 164.137-3(a), 46 CFR 164.138-2(a), 46 CFR 164.138-2(b)(2), 46 CFR 164.138-3(a), 46 CFR 164.139-2(a), 46 CFR 164.139-2(b)(2), 46 CFR 164.139-3(a) | No impact; editorial. |
Editorial | 1. Clarifies language. 2. Corrects typographical errors. 3. Deletes repetitive words and wording. | 33 CFR 149.410, 46 CFR 56.60-25(a)(4), 46 CFR 108.495, 46 CFR subpart 162.017, 46 CFR 181.500(b) | No impact; editorial. |
Electronic Submissions | 1. Adds option to submit equipment approval materials electronically. 2. Removes requirement for multiple copies of submissions for equipment approval, if submitted electronically. | 46 CFR 2.75-10(b), 46 CFR 159.001-5, 46 CFR 160.115-9(b), 46 CFR 160.115-13(g)(2), 46 CFR 160.132-9(b), 46 CFR 160.132-13(g)(2), 46 CFR 160.133-9(b), 46 CFR 160.133-13(g)(2), 46 CFR 160.135-9(b), 46 CFR 160.135-13(g)(2), 46 CFR 160.156-9(b), 46 CFR 160.156-13(g)(2), 46 CFR 160.170-9(b), 46 CFR 160.170-13(g)(2), 46 CFR 161.002-18(a), 46 CFR 161.002-19(a)(2), 46 CFR 161.012-5(a), 46 CFR 161.012-5(b)(2), 46 CFR 161.013-11(c)(1), 46 CFR 161.013-17, 46 CFR 162.050-15(a), 46 CFR 162.060-40(b), 46 CFR 164.009-9(a), 46 CFR 164.018-7(a), 46 CFR 164.018-7(b)(2) | No impact; aligns with current industry practice. Over the past 5 years, the Coast Guard has received 99.2 percent of the submissions electronically. So, this final rule codifies the use of electronic submission. |
End-for-Ending Launching Appliance Falls | 1. Removes requirement for “end-for-ending” for launching appliance falls, to align with SOLAS. 2. Revises interval for launching appliance falls replacement to 5 years. | 46 CFR 109.301(j), 46 CFR 199.190(j) | Cost savings; reduces testing burdens by allowing owners and operators to replace the falls every 5 years without the end-for-ending requirement. |
EPIRB | Aligns Coast Guard acceptance of EPIRBs in 46 CFR with Federal Communications Commission (FCC) requirements in 47 CFR and standards established by the Space System for the Search of Vessels in Distress (COSPAS), Search and Rescue Satellite-Aided Tracking (SARSAT), and RTCM. | 46 CFR 161.011-1, 46 CFR 161.011-5, 46 CFR 161.011-10 | No impact; aligns with, current industry practice. |
Equipment Deletion | Deletes pilot hoist approval series, § 163.002, and associated references in various subchapters. | 46 CFR 32.90-1(h), 46 CFR 77.40-1(h), 46 CFR 96.40-1(h), 46 CFR 108.719(h), 46 CFR subpart 163.002, 46 CFR 195.40-1(h) | No impact; aligns with current industry practice. |
Fire Protection and Other Conforming Amendments | 1. Corrects fire extinguisher ratings. 2. Clarifies fire extinguisher quantities. 3. Adds option to allow use of nationally recognized testing laboratory (NRTL) listed and labeled fire detection systems as excess equipment for MODUs. 4. Adds grandfathering provision for fire extinguishers for public nautical school ships and sailing school ships. | 46 CFR 34.10-90(a)(3), 46 CFR 34.50-10(a), 46 CFR 76.50-10(a), 46 CFR 95.50-10(a), 46 CFR 105.14(a), 46 CFR 108.103, 46 CFR 108.489(a)(3), 46 CFR 118.500(c), 46 CFR 167.45-40, 46 CFR 167.45-65, 46 CFR 167.45-70, 46 CFR 167.45-71, 46 CFR 167.45-75, 46 CFR 169.567(a), 46 CFR 169.568 | No impact; editorial and aligns with current industry practice. |
Foam Testing | 1. Adds option for third-party testing for foam concentrates. 2. Aligns testing processes with requirements in SOLAS and Coast Guard Office of Design and Engineering Standards (CG-ENG) Policy Letter 01-20, Third Party Foam Concentrate Analysis. | 46 CFR 31.10-18(c), 46 CFR 107.235(b)(4) | Cost savings; reduces testing burdens via the use of other test alternatives from the third party. |
Hydrostatic Testing for Inert Gas Cylinders | Revises hydrostatic testing requirements for inert gas bottles to every 12 years. | 46 CFR 147.66(a), 46 CFR 147.66(c) | Cost savings; changes the interval for hydrostatic testing for all vessels with inert gas bottles for fire protection systems from at least once in every 5 years for large bottles and 10 years for small bottles to once in every 12 years for all bottle types. |
MODU Lifesaving Appliance Release Mechanism | 1. Adds an option in 46 CFR subchapter I-A to allow lifeboats also serving as a rescue boat to have lifeboat release mechanisms instead of rescue boat release mechanisms. 2. Aligns this regulation with a similar regulation in 46 CFR subchapter W. | No impact; editorial and aligns with current industry practice. | |
Nonmetallic Piping | Removes redundant fire testing requirements for nonmetallic piping in 46 CFR subchapter K. | No impact; editorial. | |
Pressure-Vacuum Relief Valves | 1. Revises requirements for approving pressure-vacuum relief valves. 2. Updates IBR edition. | 46 CFR 39.1005, 46 CFR 39.2011(b)(1), 46 CFR 162.017-1, 46 CFR 162.017-2, 46 CFR 162.017-3(n), 46 CFR 162.017-3(r), 46 CFR 162.017-6 | No impact; editorial and aligns with current industry practice. |
Resins for Lifeboats and Rescue Boats | Removes approval series for fire-retardant resins and incorporates approval of these resins into approvals for lifeboats and rescue boats. | 46 CFR 160.135-5(d), 46 CFR 160.135-7(b)(3)(iv)(A), 46 CFR 160.156-5(d), 46 CFR 160.156-7(b)(3)(iv)(A), 46 CFR subpart 164.120 | No impact; editorial. |
Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus | Removes obsolete requirement for MSHA approval for SCBAs. | 46 CFR 35.30-20(c)(1), 46 CFR 77.35-5(b), 46 CFR 96.35-5(b), 46 CFR 108.497(a), 46 CFR 132.365(b)(1), 46 CFR 167.45-60(a), 46 CFR 169.717(a)(1) | No impact; editorial. |
Stairwell Structural Fire Protection and Means of Egress | Clarifies the stairwell structural fire protection and means of egress requirements for 46 CFR subchapter K vessels. | No impact; editorial. | |
Winches and Davits | 1. Removes prescriptive design requirements for winch and davit safety devices under the LSA Code. 2. Aligns the safety device requirement with the LSA Code. | No impact; editorial. |
Table 5—Baseline Cost for Foam Testing
Period | Foam testing population for each period | Cost per test | Total cost |
---|---|---|---|
(A) | (B) | (C) = (A) × (B) | |
1 | 132 × (0.40) | $150 | $7,920 |
2 | 132 × (0.40) | 150 | 7,920 |
3 | 132 × (0.40) | 150 | 7,920 |
4 | 132 × (0.40) | 150 | 7,920 |
5 | 132 × (0.40) | 150 | 7,920 |
6 | 132 × (0.40) | 150 | 7,920 |
7 | 132 × (0.40) | 150 | 7,920 |
8 | 132 × (0.40) | 150 | 7,920 |
9 | 132 × (0.40) | 150 | 7,920 |
10 | 132 × (0.40) | 150 | 7,920 |
Total | 79,200 | ||
Note: Totals may not sum due to independent rounding. | |||
* This test occurs twice in a 5-year period. |
Table 6—Baseline Cost for Inert Gas Cylinders
Period | Inert gas population for each period | Cost per test | Total cost |
---|---|---|---|
(A) | (B) | (C) = (A) × (B) | |
1 | 169 × (0.10) | $1,820 | $30,758 |
2 | 169 × (0.10) | 1,820 | 30,758 |
3 | 169 × (0.10) | 1,820 | 30,758 |
4 | 169 × (0.10) | 1,820 | 30,758 |
5 | 169 × (0.10) | 1,820 | 30,758 |
6 | 169 × (0.10) | 1,820 | 30,758 |
7 | 169 × (0.10) | 1,820 | 30,758 |
8 | 169 × (0.10) | 1,820 | 30,758 |
9 | 169 × (0.10) | 1,820 | 30,758 |
10 | 169 × (0.10) | 1,820 | 30,758 |
Total | 307,580 | ||
Note: Totals may not sum due to independent rounding. | |||
* This test occurs once every 10 years. |
Table 7—U.S.-Flagged Vessel Population by Inspection Subchapter for Lifeboats
Subchapter | Description | Population |
---|---|---|
D | Tank Vessels | 20 |
H | Passenger Vessels (≥100 gross tons) | 3 |
I | Cargo and Miscellaneous Vessels | 311 |
I-A | Mobile Offshore Drilling Units (MODUs) | 1 |
K | Small Passenger Vessels Carrying More Than 49 Passengers | 5 |
M | Towing Vessels | 45 |
O & D Combination (tank barge or freight barge) | Combination Bulk Cargo-including chemicals | 19 |
R | Nautical Schools | 8 |
U | Oceanographic Research Vessels | 17 |
T | Small Passenger Vessels (under 100 gross tons) | 13 |
Total | 442 |
Table 8—Baseline Cost for Lifeboat Wire Falls
Period | Lifeboat wire falls population for each period | Cost per turning | Total cost |
---|---|---|---|
(A) | (B) | (C) = (A) × (B) | |
1 | 884 × (0.20) | $2,000 | $353,600 |
2 | 884 × (0.20) | 2,000 | 353,600 |
3 | 884 × (0.20) | 2,000 | 353,600 |
4 | 884 × (0.20) | 2,000 | 353,600 |
5 | 884 × (0.20) | 2,000 | 353,600 |
6 | 884 × (0.20) | 2,000 | 353,600 |
7 | 884 × (0.20) | 2,000 | 353,600 |
8 | 884 × (0.20) | 2,000 | 353,600 |
9 | 884 × (0.20) | 2,000 | 353,600 |
10 | 884 × (0.20) | 2,000 | 353,600 |
Total | 3,536,000 | ||
Note: Totals may not sum due to independent rounding. | |||
* This test occurs twice in a 5-year period. |
Table 9—Summary of Baseline Costs Associated With Each Item
Period | Foam testing | Lifeboat wire falls | Inert gas testing | Undiscounted cost |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | $7,920 | $353,600 | $30,758 | $392,278 |
2 | 7,920 | 353,600 | 30,758 | 392,278 |
3 | 7,920 | 353,600 | 30,758 | 392,278 |
4 | 7,920 | 353,600 | 30,758 | 392,278 |
5 | 7,920 | 353,600 | 30,758 | 392,278 |
6 | 7,920 | 353,600 | 30,758 | 392,278 |
7 | 7,920 | 353,600 | 30,758 | 392,278 |
8 | 7,920 | 353,600 | 30,758 | 392,278 |
9 | 7,920 | 353,600 | 30,758 | 392,278 |
10 | 7,920 | 353,600 | 30,758 | 392,278 |
Total | 79,200 | 3,5360,000 | 307,580 | 3,922,780 |
Note: Totals may not sum due to independent rounding. |
Table 10—Cost Change for Foam Testing
Period | Foam testing population for each period | Cost per test | Total cost |
---|---|---|---|
(A) | (B) | (C) = (A) × (B) | |
1 | 132 × (0.40) | $115 | $6,072 |
2 | 132 × (0.40) | 115 | 6,072 |
3 | 132 × (0.40) | 115 | 6,072 |
4 | 132 × (0.40) | 115 | 6,072 |
5 | 132 × (0.40) | 115 | 6,072 |
6 | 132 × (0.40) | 115 | 6,072 |
7 | 132 × (0.40) | 115 | 6,072 |
8 | 132 × (0.40) | 115 | 6,072 |
9 | 132 × (0.40) | 115 | 6,072 |
10 | 132 × (0.40) | 115 | 6,072 |
Total | 60,720 | ||
Note: Totals may not sum due to independent rounding. | |||
* This test occurs twice in a 5-year period. |
Table 11—Net Cost Savings for Foam Testing
Period | Baseline cost * | Cost ** | Total cost savings |
---|---|---|---|
(A) | (B) | (C) = (A)−(B) | |
1 | $7,920 | $6,072 | $1,848 |
2 | 7,920 | 6,072 | 1,848 |
3 | 7,920 | 6,072 | 1,848 |
4 | 7,920 | 6,072 | 1,848 |
5 | 7,920 | 6,072 | 1,848 |
6 | 7,920 | 6,072 | 1,848 |
7 | 7,920 | 6,072 | 1,848 |
8 | 7,920 | 6,072 | 1,848 |
9 | 7,920 | 6,072 | 1,848 |
10 | 7,920 | 6,072 | 1,848 |
Total | 79,200 | 60,720 | 18,480 |
Note: Totals may not sum due to independent rounding. | |||
* Table 5. | |||
** Table 10. |
Table 12—Cost Change for Inert Gas Cylinders
Period | Inert gas population for each period | Cost per test | Total cost |
---|---|---|---|
(A) | (B) | (C) = (A) × (B) | |
1 | 169 × (0.083) | $1,820 | $25,632 |
2 | 169 × (0.083) | 1,820 | 25,632 |
3 | 169 × (0.083) | 1,820 | 25,632 |
4 | 169 × (0.083) | 1,820 | 25,632 |
5 | 169 × (0.083) | 1,820 | 25,632 |
6 | 169 × (0.083) | 1,820 | 25,632 |
7 | 169 × (0.083) | 1,820 | 25,632 |
8 | 169 × (0.083) | 1,820 | 25,632 |
9 | 169 × (0.083) | 1,820 | 25,632 |
10 | 169 × (0.083) | 1,820 | 25,632 |
Total | 256,320 | ||
Note: Totals may not sum due to independent rounding. |
Table 13—Net Cost Savings for Inert Gas Cylinders
Period | Baseline cost * | Cost ** | Total cost saving |
---|---|---|---|
(A) | (B) | (C) = (A)−(B) | |
1 | $30,758 | $25,632 | $5,126 |
2 | 30,758 | 25,632 | 5,126 |
3 | 30,758 | 25,632 | 5,126 |
4 | 30,758 | 25,632 | 5,126 |
5 | 30,758 | 25,632 | 5,126 |
6 | 30,758 | 25,632 | 5,126 |
7 | 30,758 | 25,632 | 5,126 |
8 | 30,758 | 25,632 | 5,126 |
9 | 30,758 | 25,632 | 5,126 |
10 | 30,758 | 25,632 | 5,126 |
Total | 307,580 | 256,320 | 51,260 |
Note: Totals may not sum due to independent rounding. | |||
* Table 6. | |||
** Table 12. |
Table 14—Net Cost Savings for Lifeboat Wire Falls
Period | Baseline cost * | Cost | Total cost saving |
---|---|---|---|
(A) | (B) | (C) = (A)−(B) | |
1 | $353,600 | $0 | $353,600 |
2 | 353,600 | 0 | 353,600 |
3 | 353,600 | 0 | 353,600 |
4 | 353,600 | 0 | 353,600 |
5 | 353,600 | 0 | 353,600 |
6 | 353,600 | 0 | 353,600 |
7 | 353,600 | 0 | 353,600 |
8 | 353,600 | 0 | 353,600 |
9 | 353,600 | 0 | 353,600 |
10 | 353,600 | 0 | 353,600 |
Total | 3,536,000 | 0 | 3,536,000 |
Note: Totals may not sum due to independent rounding. | |||
* Table 8. |
Table 15—Summary of Cost Savings of the Final Rule
[10-Year period of analysis, 7- and 3-percent discount rates]
Period | Foam testing * | Inert gas testing ** | Lifeboat wire falls *** | Undiscounted cost savings | 7% Discount | 3% Discount |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | $1,848 | $5,126 | $353,600 | $360,574 | $336,985 | $350,072 |
2 | 1,848 | 5,126 | 353,600 | 360,574 | 314,939 | 339,876 |
3 | 1,848 | 5,126 | 353,600 | 360,574 | 294,336 | 329,976 |
4 | 1,848 | 5,126 | 353,600 | 360,574 | 275,080 | 320,365 |
5 | 1,848 | 5,126 | 353,600 | 360,574 | 257,084 | 311,034 |
6 | 1,848 | 5,126 | 353,600 | 360,574 | 240,266 | 301,975 |
7 | 1,848 | 5,126 | 353,600 | 360,574 | 224,547 | 293,180 |
8 | 1,848 | 5,126 | 353,600 | 360,574 | 209,857 | 284,640 |
9 | 1,848 | 5,126 | 353,600 | 360,574 | 196,128 | 276,350 |
10 | 1,848 | 5,126 | 353,600 | 360,574 | 183,298 | 268,301 |
Total | 18,480 | 51,260 | 3,536,000 | 3,605,740 | 2,532,521 | 3,075,769 |
Annualized | 360,574 | 360,574 | ||||
Note: Totals may not sum due to independent rounding. | ||||||
* Table 11. | ||||||
** Table 13. | ||||||
*** Table 14. |
Table 16—Summary of the Annual Cost Savings per Entity per Vessel of the Final Rule
Item | Number of small entities | Cost saving per entity per vessel | Cost saving per vessel |
---|---|---|---|
(A) | (B) | (C) = (A) × (B) | |
Foam Testing | 68 | $14 | $952 |
Lifeboat Wire Falls | 251 | 800 | 200,800 |
Inert Gas Testing | 8 | 218 | 1,744 |
Foam Testing and Lifeboat Wire Falls | 36 | 814 | 29,304 |
Lifeboat Wire Falls and Inert Gas Testing | 2 | 890 | 1,780 |
Foam Testing, Lifeboat Wire Falls, and Inert Gas Testing | 2 | 2,314 | 4,628 |
Total | 367 | 239,208 |
Table 17—Distribution of Revenue Impacts
Percent of revenue impact | Average annual impact per vessel | Small entities with known revenue | ||||
<1% | Foam Testing | Lifeboat Wire Falls | Inert Gas Testing | Foam Testing and Lifeboat Wire Falls | Lifeboat Wire Falls and Inert Gas Testing | 51 |
Cost Savings per Vessel | $14 | $800 | $218 | $814 | $890 | |
Cost Savings per Small Entity | $28 | $1,600 | $436 | $1,628 | $1,780 |
Table 1 to § 34.50-10( a )—Portable and Semi-Portable Extinguishers
Table 1 to 76.50-10 (b) —Carriage of Portable and Semi-Portable Fire Extinguishers
Table 1 to § 108.495—Carriage of Portable Fire Extinguishers
Table 1 to § 169.567 (a) —Required Portable Fire Extinguishers
Space | Portable fire extinguishers | |
---|---|---|
Minimum required rating | Quantity and location | |
Propulsion machinery space without fixed extinguishing system | 40-B:C | 2. |
Propulsion machinery space with fixed extinguishing system | 40-B:C | 1 in the vicinity of the exit. |
Living space and open boats | 2-A | 1 per 1,000 cubic foot of space. |
Galley (without fixed system) | 40-B:C | 1 per 500 cubic foot. |
Spare Units | 2-A | 10 percent of the required number rounded up. |
40-B:C | 10 percent of the required number rounded up. |
Table 1 to § 181.500( b )—Required Portable Fire Extinguishers
Space | Portable fire extinguishers | |
---|---|---|
Minimum required rating | Quantity and location | |
Operating Station | 10-B:C | 1. |
Machinery Space | 40-B:C | 1 in the vicinity of the exit. |
Open Vehicle Deck | 40-B | 1 for every 10 vehicles. |
Accommodation Space | 2-A | 1 each for each 2,500 square feet (232.3 square meters) or fraction thereof. |
Galley | 40-B:C | 1. |
Pantry, concession stand | 2-A | 1 in the vicinity of the exit. |