Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe From the United Arab Emirates: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2021-2022

Download PDF
Federal RegisterJul 12, 2024
89 Fed. Reg. 57128 (Jul. 12, 2024)

AGENCY:

Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY:

The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that producers/exporters of circular welded carbon-quality steel pipe (CWP) made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR), December 1, 2021, through November 30, 2022.

DATES:

Applicable July 12, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Rebecca Janz or Sofia Pedrelli, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2972 or (202) 482-4301, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

On January 8, 2024, Commerce published in the Federal Register the preliminary results of the 2021-2022 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on CWP from the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The review covers seven companies, including two mandatory respondents, Conares Metal Supply Limited (Conares) and Universal Tube and Plastic Industries, Ltd./THL Tube and Pipe Industries LLC/KHK Scaffolding and Formwork LLC (collectively, Universal), for individual examination.

See Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe from the United Arab Emirates: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2021-2022,89 FR 899 (January 8, 2024) ( Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.

See Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe from the Sultanate of Oman, Pakistan, and the United Arab Emirates: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping Duty Determination and Antidumping Duty Orders,81 FR 91906 (December 19, 2016) ( Order).

Commerce previously determined that Universal is a single entity consisting of the following three producers/exporters of subject merchandise: Universal Tube and Plastic Industries, Ltd.; KHK Scaffolding and Formwork LLC; and Universal Tube and Pipe Industries LLC. See Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe from the United Arab Emirates: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value,81 FR 75030 (October 28, 2016), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum. Additionally, we previously determined that THL Tube and Pipe Industries LLC is the successor-in-interest to Universal Tube and Pipe Industries LLC . See Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe from the United Arab Emirates: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017,84 FR 44845 (August 27, 2019). Because no information on the record of this review contradicts these findings, we continue to treat these companies as a single entity.

We invited parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. On February 14, 2024, we received case briefs from Conares and Universal; we did not receive any rebuttal briefs. On April 24, 2024, we extended the deadline for the final results until July 3, 2024. For a complete description of the events that occurred since the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Commerce conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).

See Preliminary Results.

See Conares' Letter, “Case Brief,” dated February 14, 2024; and Universal's Letter, “Case Brief,” dated February 14, 2024.

See Memorandum, “Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,” dated April 24, 2024.

See Memorandum, “Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe from the United Arab Emirates; 2021-2022,” dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, these results (Issues and Decision Memorandum).

Scope of the Order

The products covered by the Order are CWP from the UAE. A complete description of the scope of the Order is contained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.

Analysis of Comments Received

All issues raised in the case briefs filed by interested parties in this administrative review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum and are listed in an appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

Based on a review of the record and comments received from interested parties regarding the Preliminary Results, and for the reasons explained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, Commerce made certain changes to the preliminary weighted-average dumping margin calculations for Conares, Universal, and the non-examined companies for the final results of review.

See Issues and Decision Memorandum.

Rates for Non-Examined Companies

The Act and Commerce's regulations do not address the establishment of a rate to be applied to individual companies not selected for examination when Commerce limits its examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in a less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, for guidance when calculating the weighted-average dumping margin for companies which were not selected for individual examination in an administrative review. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others rate is normally an amount equal to the weighted average of the estimated weighted-average dumping margins established for exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding rates that are zero, de minimis ( i.e., less than 0.5 percent), or determined entirely on the basis of facts available.

For the final results, Commerce calculated weighted-average dumping margins for Conares and Universal that are not zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts otherwise available. Accordingly, Commerce has continued to calculate the rate for companies not selected for individual examination using a weighted average of the weighted-average dumping margins calculated for Conares and Universal, weighted by each respondent's publicly-ranged total U.S. sales value.

When Commerce's individual examination of respondents is limited to two respondents, Commerce normally calculates: (A) a weighted average of the weighted-average dumping margins calculated for the individually-examined respondents; (B) a simple average of the weighted-average dumping margins calculated for the individually-examined respondents; and (C) a weighted average of the weighted-average dumping margins calculated for the individually-examined respondents using each company's publicly-ranged U.S. sales quantities of subject merchandise. Commerce then compares then compares (B) and (C) to (A) and selects either the (B) or (C) rate based on the rate closest to (A) as the most appropriate rate for companies not selected for individual examination, as using the (A) rate would result in the disclosure of business proprietary information. See, e.g., Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews, Final Results of Changed-Circumstances Review, and Revocation of an Order in Part,75 FR 53661, 53663 (September 1, 2010). In this review, Commerce based the rate for companies not selected for individual examination on the publicly-ranged sales data of the mandatory respondents. For an analysis of the data, see Memorandum, “Calculation of the Review-Specific Rate for Non-Selected Companies for the Final Results,” dated concurrently with this notice.

Final Results of Administrative Review

As a result of this review, we determine that the following estimated weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period December 1, 2021, through November 30, 2022:

Producer/exporter Weighted-average dumping margin (percent)
Conares Metal Supply Limited 0.90
Universal Tube and Plastic Industries, Ltd; THL Tube and Pipe Industries LLC; KHK Scaffolding and Formwork LLC 1.00
Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable to the Following Companies
Ajmal Steel Tubes & Pipes Ind., L.L.C 0.98
K.D. Industries Inc 0.98
TSI Metal Industries L.L.C 0.98

Disclosure

Commerce intends to disclose the calculations performed in connection with these final results of review to interested parties within five days after public announcement of the final results or, if there is no public announcement, within five days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register , in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Assessment Rate

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), Commerce has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review.

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), because Conares and Universal reported the entered value of their U.S. sales, we calculated importer-specific ad valorem duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for each importer's examined sales and the total entered value of those sales. Where either the respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an importer-specific rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.

For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by each individually examined respondent for which the producer did not know that the merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate established in the LTFV investigation ( i.e., 5.95 percent) if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.

See Order.

See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties,68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).

For the companies identified above that were not selected for individual examination, we will instruct CBP to liquidate entries at the rate determined in these final results of review.

Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this review in the Federal Register . If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired ( i.e., within 90 days of publication).

Cash Deposit Requirements

Upon publication of this notice in the Federal Register , the following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for each company listed above will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin established in the final results of this review; (2) for merchandise exported by producers or exporters not covered in this review but covered in a prior completed segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published in the completed segment for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original LTFV investigation, but the producer has been covered in a prior completed segment of this proceeding, then the cash deposit rate will be the rate established in the completed segment for the most recent period for the producer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be 5.95 percent, the all-others rate established in the LTFV investigation for this proceeding. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.

Id.

Notification to Importers

This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Order

This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation subject to sanction.

Notification to Interested Parties

We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).

Dated: July 3, 2024.

Ryan Majerus,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary

II. Background

III. Scope of the Order

IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results

V. Discussion of the Issues

Comment 1: Differential Pricing Analysis

Comment 2: Appropriate Currency for Conares' Domestic Inland Freight

Comment 3: Cost of Manufacture for Sales-Below-Cost-Test

Comment 4: Correction of Name of Company Which is Part of the Collapsed Entity

VI. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2024-15330 Filed 7-11-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P