Wright Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Mar 31, 2005

344 N.L.R.B. 57 (N.L.R.B. 2005)

344 NLRB No. 57
Covenant Care of Ohio, Inc. d/b/a Wright Nursing
and Rehabilitation Center and International As-
sociation of Machinists and Aerospace Workers,
AFL–CIO, District Lodge 34. Case 9–CA–41696
March 31, 2005
DECISION AND ORDER
BY CHAIRMAN BATTISTA AND MEMBERS LIEBMAN
AND SCHAUMBER
This is a refusal-to-bargain case in which the Respon-
dent is contesting the Union’s certification as bargaining
representative in the underlying representation proceed-
ing. Pursuant to a charge filed on January 27, 2005, the
General Counsel issued the complaint on February 11,
2005, alleging that the Respondent has violated Section
8(a)(1) and (5) of the Act by refusing the Union’s request
to bargain following the Union’s certification in Case 9–
RC–17918. (Official notice is taken of the “record” in
the representation proceeding as defined in the Board’s
Rules and Regulations, Secs. 102.68 and 102.69(g);
Frontier Hotel, 265 NLRB 343 (1982).) The Respondent
filed an answer admitting in part and denying in part the
allegations in the complaint, and asserting an affirmative
defense.
On March 4, 2005, the General Counsel filed a Motion
for Summary Judgment and memorandum in support.
On March 9, 2005, the Board issued an order transferring
the proceeding to the Board and a Notice to Show Cause
why the motion should not be granted. The Respondent
filed a response.
Ruling on Motion for Summary Judgment
The Respondent admits its refusal to bargain, but con-
tends that the Union’s certification is invalid because the
Board erred in overruling its objections to the election in
the representation proceeding. The Respondent also
raises as an affirmative defense that “the Union was im-
properly certified” and therefore the Respondent “is un-
der no legal duty to recognize or bargain with the Un-
ion.”
All representation issues raised by the Respondent
were or could have been litigated in the prior representa-
tion proceeding. The Respondent does not offer to ad-
duce at a hearing any newly discovered and previously
unavailable evidence, nor does it allege any special cir-
cumstances that would require the Board to reexamine
the decision made in the representation proceeding. We
therefore find that the Respondent has not raised any
representation issue that is properly litigable in this un-
fair labor practice proceeding. See Pittsburgh Plate
Glass Co. v. NLRB, 313 U.S. 146, 162 (1941).1 Accord-
ingly, we grant the Motion for Summary Judgment.2
On the entire record, the Board makes the following
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. JURISDICTION
At all material times, the Respondent, a corporation,
has been engaged in the operation of a nursing home at
its 829 Yellow Springs, Fairfield Road, Fairborn, Ohio
facility.
During the 12-month period preceding issuance of the
complaint, the Respondent, in conducting its operations
described above, had a gross volume of business in ex-
cess of $250,000, and purchased and received at its Fair-
born, Ohio facility, goods valued in excess of $2000 di-
rectly from points outside the State of Ohio.
We find that the Respondent is an employer engaged
in commerce within the meaning of Section 2(2), (6), and
(7) of the Act, and that International Association of Ma-
chinists and Aerospace Workers, AFL–CIO, District
Lodge 34 (the Union) is a labor organization within the
meaning of Section 2(5) of the Act.
II. ALLEGED UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES
A. The Certification
Following the election held on July 20, 2004, the Un-
ion was certified on November 17, 2004, as the exclusive
collective-bargaining representative of the employees in
the following appropriate unit:
All full-time and regular part-time certified nurse assis-
tant/state tested nurse assistant, housekeeping, dietary,
laundry, restorative, activity, and maintenance employ-
ees employed by the Employer at its 829 Yellow
Springs, Fairfield Road, Fairborn, Ohio facility, but ex-
cluding all registered nurses, licensed practical nurses,
select therapy employees, all office clerical employees,
and all professional employees, guards and supervisors
as defined in the Act.
The Union continues to be the exclusive representative un-
der Section 9(a) of the Act.
B. Refusal to Bargain
On about November 23, 2004, the Union, in writing,
requested that the Respondent recognize and bargain
collectively with it as the exclusive collective-bargaining

1 Chairman Battista did not participate in the underlying representa-
tion proceeding. He agrees, however, that the Respondent has not
raised any new matters or special circumstances warranting a hearing in
this proceeding or reconsideration of the decision in the representation
proceeding, and that therefore summary judgment is appropriate.
2 The Respondent’s requests that the complaint be dismissed, that the
Union’s certification be revoked, and that the Respondent be awarded
costs and attorneys’ fees are therefore denied.
DECISIONS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD2
representative of the unit. Since about November 23,
2004, the Respondent has failed and refused to recognize
and bargain with the Union. We find that this failure and
refusal constitutes an unlawful refusal to bargain in vio-
lation of Section 8(a)(1) and (5) of the Act.
CONCLUSION OF LAW
By failing and refusing since November 23, 2004, to
bargain with the Union as the exclusive collective-
bargaining representative of employees in the appropriate
unit, the Respondent has engaged in unfair labor prac-
tices affecting commerce within the meaning of Section
8(a)(1) and (5) and Section 2(6) and (7) of the Act.
REMEDY
Having found that the Respondent has violated Section
8(a)(1) and (5) of the Act, we shall order it to cease and
desist, to bargain on request with the Union and, if an
understanding is reached, to embody the understanding
in a signed agreement.
To ensure that the employees are accorded the services
of their selected bargaining agent for the period provided
by law, we shall construe the initial period of the certifi-
cation as beginning the date the Respondent begins to
bargain in good faith with the Union. Mar-Jac Poultry
Co., 136 NLRB 785 (1962); Lamar Hotel, 140 NLRB
226, 229 (1962), enfd. 328 F.2d 600 (5th Cir. 1964), cert.
denied 379 U.S. 817 (1964); Burnett Construction Co.,
149 NLRB 1419, 1421 (1964), enfd. 350 F.2d 57 (10th
Cir. 1965).
ORDER
The National Labor Relations Board orders that the
Respondent, Covenant Care of Ohio, Inc. d/b/a Wright
Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, Fairborn, Ohio, its
officers, agents, successors, and assigns, shall
1. Cease and desist from
(a) Refusing to bargain with International Association
of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, AFL–CIO, Dis-
trict Lodge 34, as the exclusive bargaining representative
of the employees in the bargaining unit.
(b) In any like or related manner interfering with, re-
straining, or coercing employees in the exercise of the
rights guaranteed them by Section 7 of the Act.
2. Take the following affirmative action necessary to
effectuate the policies of the Act.
(a) On request, bargain with the Union as the exclusive
representative of the employees in the following appro-
priate unit on terms and conditions of employment and, if
an understanding is reached, embody the understanding
in a signed agreement:
All full-time and regular part-time certified nurse assis-
tant/state tested nurse assistant, housekeeping, dietary,
laundry, restorative, activity, and maintenance employ-
ees employed by the Employer at its 829 Yellow
Springs, Fairfield Road, Fairborn, Ohio facility, but ex-
cluding all registered nurses, licensed practical nurses,
select therapy employees, all office clerical employees,
and all professional employees, guards and supervisors
as defined in the Act.
(b) Within 14 days after service by the Region, post at
its facility in Fairborn, Ohio, copies of the attached no-
tice marked “Appendix.”3 Copies of the notice, on forms
provided by the Regional Director for Region 9, after
being signed by the Respondent’s authorized representa-
tive, shall be posted by the Respondent and maintained
for 60 consecutive days in conspicuous places, including
all places where notices to employees are customarily
posted. Reasonable steps shall be taken by the Respon-
dent to ensure that the notices are not altered, defaced, or
covered by any other material. In the event that, during
the pendency of these proceedings, the Respondent has
gone out of business or closed the facility involved in
these proceedings, the Respondent shall duplicate and
mail, at its own expense, a copy of the notice to all cur-
rent employees and former employees employed by the
Respondent at any time since November 23, 2004.
(c) Within 21 days after service by the Region, file
with the Regional Director a sworn certification of a re-
sponsible official on a form provided by the Region at-
testing to the steps that the Respondent has taken to
comply.
APPENDIX
NOTICE TO EMPLOYEES
POSTED BY ORDER OF THE
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
An Agency of the United States Government
The National Labor Relations Board has found that we violated
Federal labor law and has ordered us to post and obey this no-
tice.
FEDERAL LAW GIVES YOU THE RIGHT TO
Form, join, or assist a union
Choose representatives to bargain with us on your be-
half
Act together with other employees for your benefit and
protection
Choose not to engage in any of these protected activi-
ties.
WE WILL NOT refuse to bargain with International Associa-
tion of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, AFL–CIO, District

3 If this Order is enforced by a judgment of a United States court of
appeals, the words in the notice reading “Posted by Order of the Na-
tional Labor Relations Board” shall read “Posted Pursuant to a Judg-
ment of the United States Court of Appeals Enforcing an Order of the
National Labor Relations Board.”
WRIGHT NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER 3
Lodge 34, as the exclusive representative of the employees in
the bargaining unit.
WE WILL NOT in any like or related manner interfere with, re-
strain, or coerce you in the exercise of the rights guaranteed
you by Section 7 of the Act.
WE WILL, on request, bargain with the Union and put in writ-
ing and sign any agreement reached on terms and conditions of
employment for our employees in the bargaining unit:
All full-time and regular part-time certified nurse assis-
tant/state tested nurse assistant, housekeeping, dietary, laun-
dry, restorative, activity, and maintenance employees em-
ployed by us at our 829 Yellow Springs, Fairfield Road, Fair-
born, Ohio facility, but excluding all registered nurses, li-
censed practical nurses, select therapy employees, all office
clerical employees, and all professional employees, guards
and supervisors as defined in the Act.
COVENANT CARE OF OHIO, INC. D/B/A WRIGHT
NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER