Wisconsin Gas & Electric Co.

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Jul 14, 1944

57 N.L.R.B. 285 (N.L.R.B. 1944)

In the Matter of WISCONSIN GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY and PUBLIC
SERVICE EMPLOYEES LOCAL INDUSTRIAL UNION, C. I. O.
Case No. 13-R--364.Decided July 14, 19441
Shaw, Muskat and Paulsen, by Mr. F. H. Prosser , of Milwaukee,
Wis., for the Company.
. Messrs. F. J. Micl4el and Walter Debussy, of Milwaukee , Wis., and
Mr. Theodore R. Reitz, of Racine , Wis., for the CIO.
Mr. Arthel AShelton , of Chicago , Ill., for District 50.
Messrs. Alfred H. Handrich and B. M. Feinberg , of Milwaukee, Wis.,
for the Association.
Padway cfi Goldberg , by Mr . A. G. Goldberg , of Milwaukee, Wis.,
for the IBEW.
Miss Frances Lopinsky , of counsel to the Board.
DECISION
DIRECTION OF ELECTION
AND
ORDER
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Upon a petition duly filed by Public Service Employees Local Indus-
trial Union, C. I. 0., herein called the CIO, alleging that a question
affecting commerce had arisen concerning the representation of em-
ployees of Wisconsin Gas & Electric Company, Racine, Wisconsin,
herein called the Company, the National Labor Relations Board pro-
vided for an appropriate hearing upon due notice before Gustaf B.
Erickson, Trial Examiner. Said hearing was held at Racine, Wiscon-
sin, on May 4, 1944. The Company, the CIO, District 50, United Mine
Workers of America, herein called District 50, United Association of
Office, Sales and Technical Employees, herein called the Association,
and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No.
4948 (A. F. of L.), herein called the IBEW, appeared and participated.
All parties were afforded full opportunity to be heard, to examine and
cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing on the
issues. The Company moved that the petition be dismissed on the
57 N. L. R. B., No. 53.
285
286 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
ground that by order of a Wisconsin state court, the CIO and the
president of the CIO are incapable of lawfully representing the em-
ployees of the Company,' and, therefore, if the CIO is certified by the
Board, the Company cannot negotiate with that union without commit-
ting an unlawful act. The motion is hereby denied. Whatever effect
the court order may have had upon the CIO has been cured by a time
limitation therein. Whatever liability it may have imposed upon
Reitz cannot affect the right of the employees to select a representative
of their choice to bargain for them .2 The order placed on the Com-
pany only the duty to inform its employees of the contents thereof. It
did not inhibit the Company in any way. The fear expressed by the
Company is, therefore, unfounded.
The Association and District 50 moved that the petition be dis-
missed on the ground that the unit requested is inappropriate for
bargaining. For reasons hereinafter stated, the motion is in part
granted and is part denied. The Trial Examiner's rulings made at the
hearing are free ' from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. All
.parties were afforded an opportunity to file briefs with the Board.
Upon the entire record in the case the Board makes the following :
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY
Wisconsin Gas & Electric Company is a subsidiary of Wisconsin
Electric Power Company of Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Its principal
offices are in Racine, Wisconsin. The Company is engaged in the
manufacture and distribution of gas and electricity in about seven
counties in the southern part of Wisconsin. In this area it has in
excess of 100,000 customers, a large number of which are companies
engaged in vital defense work. It annually purchases approximately
$400,000 worth of coal for the production of gas, which is shipped
to Racine from West Virginia. It also purchases a substantial amount
of appliances and equipment which are shipped to Racine from points
outside the State of Wisconsin. We find that the business of the
Company affects commerce within the meaning of the National Labor
Relations Act.
1 A court Order dated January 14, 1944, suspended Public Service Employees Union, herein
called the,PSEU, from acting as bargaining representative for the employees of the Com-
pany for a period not to exceed 6 months , and suspended Theodore R. Reitz, president
of the PSEU from acting , in any capacity , as a representative of the employees of the
Company for a period of 1 year. Reitz is now president of the CIO Local and the
Company contends that the CIO is a successor to the PSEU and that the suspension applies
to it.
3 See Matter of Eppinger & Russell, 56 N. L. It. B. 1259.
WISCONSIN GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
II. THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED
287
Public Service Employees Local Industrial Union, affiliated with
the Congress of Industrial Organizations; District 50, United Mine
Workers of America; United Association of Office, Sales and Tech-
nical Employees; and International Brotherhood of Electrical Work-
ers, affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, are all labor
organizations admitting to membership employees of the Company.
III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION
In January 1944, the CIO requested recognition as exclusive bar-
gaining representative of certain of the Company's employees. The
Company refused to recognize the CIO, for the asserted reason that it
was under contractual obligation to Public Service Employees Union,
herein called the PSEU. Although the PSEU at one time represented
the employees whom the CIO noly seeks to represent, the contract
between the Company and the PSEU terminated in November 1943
and negotiations for a new contract between these parties ceased in
January 1944. The PSEU is now in process of dissolution. No
existing contract is, therefore, a bar to a present determination of
representatives.
A statement of a Board agent introduced into evidence at the hear-
ing, supplemented by a statement of the Trial Examiner made at the
hearing, indicates that each of the participating unions herein repre-
sents a substantial number of employees in the unit, or voting group,
which it contends is appropriate.3
We find that a question affecting commerce had arisen concerning
the representation of employees of the Company, within the meaning
of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act.
IV. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT
The Company operates in four divisions : Racine, Kenosha, Northern
and Western. With one exception, all collective bargaining has been
R The CIO submitted to the Field Examiner 171 application -for-membership cards, all
of which bore names of persons listed on the Company ' s pay roll for April 17, 1944,
which contained the names of 270 persons in the unit requested by the CIO.
The Association submitted to the Trial Examiner 29 application -for-membership cards
28 of which bore names of persons listed on the Company ' s pay roll for June 15, 1944,
which contained the names of approximately 240 persons in the unit requested by the
Association.
The IBEW submitted 14 application -for-membership cards to the Field Examiner and
an additional 0 cards to the Trial Examiner, all of which bore names of persons listed
on the Company 's pay rolls of April 17 and June 15, 1944, which contained the names of
28 persons in the unit requested by the IBEW.
District 50 submitted to the Field Examiner 29 application-for-membership cards, all
of which bore names of persons listed on the Company 's pay roll for April 17, 1944, which
contained the names of 36 persons in the voting group requested by District 50.
288 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
carried on between the Company and labor organizations on the basis
of system-wide, occupational units. For purposes of bargaining, the
Company's employees have been placed in three occupational cate-
gories : electrical workers, gas utility employees, and clerical, tech-
nical and sales employees. The PSEU came into existence in 1934
as representative of the clerical, technical and sales employees. The
IBEW organized the electrical workers in 1935, and a predecessor of
District 50 organized the gas utility employees in 1936. The IBEW
presently has a contract covering all electrical workers of the Com-
pany on a system-wide basis. District 50 presently has a contract
covering all gas utility employees of -the Company except those em-
ployed in the Western Division,4 and claims to represent the gas utility
employees in, the Western Division as well. No party expressly ques-
tions the appropriateness of the three separate units so established.
The PSEU's expired contract covered all clerical, technical and sales
employees. The PSEU was also i4iformally recognized by the Com-
pany as the bargaining representative of the gas workers and steam
plant operators in the Western Division. The Association would rep-
resent only employees covered by the PSEU's contract, namely, cler-
ical, technical and sales employees. All parties are in agreement, and
we find, that the clerical, technical and sales employees of the Com-
pany constitute an appropriate unit for bargaining. The Company
and the CIO would extend this unit to include the gas utility employees
in the Western Division.' The other parties contend that the inclu-
sion of production and maintenance employees in the proposed "white-
collar" unit would be inappropriate. In accordance with our usual
practice, we so find.6
Although the CIO may, in the light of the above finding, wish to
represent the gas utility employees in the Western Division in a sep-
arate unit , we shall not at this time direct an election among them.
The history of bargaining on behalf of the employees of the Company
has been on a system-wide basis varied only in the gas utility em-
ployees' unit. We have repeatedly held that a system-wide unit of
a public utility is appropriate whenever there is a labor organiza-
tion in a position to represent employees throughout the system.z
4 Both of the above-mentioned contracts will expire December 1944.
c The Company is in agreement with the CIO as to the appropriate unit but it would
amend the CIO's description thereof for the purpose of reconciling it with the units repre-
sented by other labor organizations with which it bargains. The unit requested by the
CIO is phrased in terms of "all" meter readers, storeroom employees, station operators
and telephone operators. Gas meter readers and storeroom employees who handle gas
equipment and appliances are covered by District 50's contract; station operators In the
Racine and Kenosha Divisions and night telephone operators are covered by the IBEW's
contract.
6 See Matter of Boston Edison Company, 51 N. L. R. B. 118, Matter of Indianapolis
Power and Light Company, 51 N. L. R. B. 670, and Matter of Sierra Pacific Power Company,
56 N. L. R. B. 458.
See Matter of Pennsylvania Electric Company, 56 N. L. R. B. 625, and cases cited
therein.
WISCONSIN GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY 289
District 50 is now apparently in a position to complete the pattern
of system-wide representation, and upon the expiration of District
50's contract in less than 6 months, there will be no obstacle to an in-
vestigation of representatives for all the gas utility employees on a
system-wide basis. A division-wide unit for the representation of gas
utility employees of the Western Division is, therefore, inappropriate.
Since no party presently requests an election in the appropriate unit,
we shall dismiss the petition insofar as it concerns the gas utility
employees in the Western Division.
There are certain categories of employees who the CIO, the Associa-
tion, and the Company contend should be included in the appropriate
unit but whom the IBEW would represent in a separate unit. These
are storeroom employees handling electrical equipment and appliances,
junior engineers, telephone operators, and electric meter readers.,, All
of these employees were represented by the PSEU and covered by its
contracts. Storeroom employees keep records of materials on hand
and materials disbursed as well as assist in taking and keeping in-
ventories. The work of meter readers consists mainly of reading and
copying figures on meters and making certain calculations. Although
junior engineers perform some work with a transit in the field taking
measurements and distances , most of their work is done on a plotting
board in the offices of the Company. The day telephone operators
merely route calls.9 The fact that the duties of these employees are
incidentally connected with some phase of electricity does not alter
the fact that they are in nature predominantly clerical or technical.
We shall deny the IBEW's request for a separate unit composed
of storeroom employees handling electrical equipment, junior 'en-
gineers, telephone operators, and electric meter readers, and shall in-
clude those employees in the unit hereinafter found appropriate.
The CIO, the Association, and the Company would include in the
unit composed of clerical, technical and sales employees, and the IBEW
would exclude therefrom, the station operators in the Western Divi-
sion.10 The duties of these employees are similar to those of station
operators in the Racine and Kenosha Divisions who are represented
by the IBEW. These employees work under the supervision of load
dispatchers who are within the IBEW unit, and are in constant con-
tact with electrical workers. Although they have been included in the
unit represented by PSEU, we shall exclude all station operators
from the unit hereinabove found appropriate."
8 Since storeroom employees who handle gas equipment and appliances, night telephone
operators and gas meter readers are presently covered by existent contracts, we shall not
consider them herein. See footnote 5.
Night telephone operators work in the capacity of dispatchers.
There appear to be no station operators in the Northern Division.
This exclusion shall not apply to the station operator at Ft. Atkinson who spends" 95
percent of his time performing the duties of a storeroom employee.
601245-45-vol. 5 i-20
290 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Steam plant operators are another category of employees presently
unrepresented. The CIO would include them in their requested unit.
The IBEW contends that they are electrical workers; District 50
contends that they are gas utility employees. These employees take
readings of the electric switchboard, take care of telephone trouble
calls covering both gas and electricity on Sundays, holidays, and
daily from 5 p. m. to 8 a. m., take care of gas pressures and distribu-
tion mains, take care of steam pressures, fire the boilers and do neces-
sary repair work on steam and gas equipment. It is evident that they
are not clerical employees and we shall, therefore, exclude them from
the appropriate unit. Their interests lie with the electrical or with
the gas utility employees. Since no election is presently being directed
with reference to these two groups of employees, it is unnecessary
that we determine at this time in which of these two units they might
most effectively be represented.
The Association and the Company would further exclude from the
unit, stenographers who act as private secretaries to the heads of the
four divisions. The CIO contends that no such category exists. Be-
fore its office employees were organized, the Company employed pri-
vate secretaries. In 1936 the Wisconsin Employment Relations Board,
in a decision rendered in a representation proceeding, refused to ex-
clude them from the bargaining unit. The Company then reclassi-
fied secretaries as stenographers and ceased giving them any confi-
dential dictation. Since, in our opinion, the Company is entitled to
have a reasonable number of stenographers to whom dictation con-
cerning labor relations may be given without fear that the informa-
tion may be prematurely transmitted to a union, we shall provide for
the exclusion of confidential employees to act in this capacity.
The parties agree to the exclusion of supervisory, administrative,
and executive employees from the clerical unit. The Company con-
tends that employees in charge of developing accounting procedures
and the inventory control man aid in shaping the policy of the Com-
pany and that they come within the excluded categories. The Associa-
tion, protests the exclusion of these employees 12 from the unit. The
CIO protests only the exclusion of the inventory control man. The
inventory control man takes physical inventory of all materials in
all divisions with the exception of fuel and residual stock, traces
shortages disclosed by the physical count to determine cost and per-
sons responsible, prepares written reports of serious shortages dis-
closed and makes recommendations for the prevention of such short-
ages. The other persons in dispute develop accounting procedures,
follow the procedures to see that their purpose has been carried out
in detail, design or lay out improved procedures involving both cus-
12 A, Hughes, S. Hughes, and Verheileg.
WISCONSIN GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY 291
tomers' accounting and general accounting. We agree with the Com-
pany that these employees are executives and we shall exclude them
as such.
We find that all clerical, sales and technical employees of the Com
pany, including all employees of the accounting, sales, promotional,
addressograph, collection and engineering departments, day telephone
operators, janitors and janitresses and customer contact clerks in the
Company's offices, junior engineers, and all meter readers, bill de-
liverers, storeroom employees and night loaders,73 except those meter
readers, bill deliverers, storeroom employees and night loaders pres-
ently represented by District 50, but excluding confidential and execu-
tive employees, research engineers, and all supervisory employees with
authority to hire, promote, discharge, discipline or otherwise effect
changes in the status of employees or effectively recommend such
action constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective
bargaining within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act.
V. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES
We shall direct that the question concerning representation which
has arisen be resolved by an election by secret ballot among the em-
ployees in the appropriate unit who were employed during the pay-roll
period immediately preceding the date of the Direction of Election
herein, subject to the limitations and additions set forth in the
Direction.
DIRECTION OF ELECTION
By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor
Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations
Act, and pursuant to Article III, section 9, of National Labor Rela-
tions Board Rules and Regulations-Series 3, it is hereby
DIRECTED that, as part of the investigation to ascertain representa-
tives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Wisconsin Gas &
Electric Company, Racine, Wisconsin an election by secret ballot shall
be conducted as early as possible, but not later than thirty (30) days
from the date of this Direction, under the direction and supervision of
the Regional Director for the Thirteenth Region, acting in this matter
as agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and subject to Article
III, Sections 10 and 11, of said Rules and Regulations, among the
employees in the unit found appropriate in Section IV, above, who
were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the
date of this Direction, including employees who did not work during
the said pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation or tempo-
13 Night Loaders are storeroom employees on duty at night.
292 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
rarily laid off, and including employees in the armed forces of the
United States who present themselves in person at the polls, but ex-
cluding those employees who have since quit or been discharged for
cause and have not been rehired or reinstated prior to the date of the
election, to determine whether they desire to be represented by Public
Service Employees Local Industrial Union, C. I. 0., or by United
Association of Office, Sales and Technical Employees, for the purposes
of collective bargaining, or by neither.
ORDER
Upon the basis of the foregoing findings of fact, the National Labor
Relations Board hereby orders that the petition for investigation and
certification of representatives filed by Public Service Employees Local
Industrial Union, C. I. O., insofar and insofar only as its concerns gas
utility employees of the Western Division of Wisconsin Gas and Elec-
tric Company, be, and it hereby is, dismissed. '