Waterville Iron WorksDownload PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsDec 11, 194564 N.L.R.B. 1346 (N.L.R.B. 1945) Copy Citation In the Matter Of WATERVILLE IRON WORKS and INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS, AFL In the Matter Of WATERVILLE IRON WORKS and INTERNATIONAL MOLDERS AND FOUNDRY WORKERS UNION OF NORTH AMERICA, AFL Cases Nos. 1-P-1684 and 1-RD685, respectively .Decided December 11, 1945 Mr. Eugene Lander, of Waterville , Maine, for the Company. Mr. Harold F . Reardon, of Boston, Mass., for the Machinists. Mr. James P. Powers, of Boston, Mass., for the Molders. Miss Helen Hart, of counsel to the Board. , DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTIONS STATEMENT OF THE CASE Upon separate petitions duly filed by International Association of Machinists, AFL, herein called the Machinists, and International Molders and Foundry Workers Union of North America, AFL, herein called the Molders, alleging that questions affecting com- merce had arisen concerning the representation of employees of Waterville Iron Works, Waterville, Maine, herein called the Com- pany, the National Labor Relations Board consolidated the pro- ceedings by an order dated September 25, 1945, and provided for an appropriate hearing upon due notice before Samuel G. Zack, Trial Examiner. The hearing was held at Waterville, Maine, on September 27, 1945. The Company, the Machinists, and the Molders appeared,' participated, and were afforded full opportunity to be heard, to examine and cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce evi- dence bearing on the issues. The Trial Examiner's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. All parties were afforded an opportunity to file briefs with the Board. 1 Textile Workers Union of America , CIO, was served with Notice of Hearing but failed to appear. 64 N. L. R. B., No. 223. 1346 WATERVILLE IRON WORKS 1347 Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY Waterville Iron Works, a Maine corporation, is engaged in the manufacture of castings and machinery at Waterville, Maine. It annually purchases raw materials, valued in excess of $12,000, of which approximately 25 percent is received from points outside the State of Maine. Its sales of finished products approximate $90,000 annually, about $15,000 of which is shipped to points outside the State of Maine. We find that the Company is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act. II. THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED International Association of Machinists is a labor organization, affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, admitting to mem- bership employees of the Company. International Molders and Foundry Workers Union of North America is a labor organization, affiliated with the American Fed- eration of Labor, admitting to membership employees of the Company. IH. THE QUESTIONS CONCERNING REPRESENTATION The Company has refused to recognize either the Machinists or the Molders as exclusive bargaining representative of its machine shop or foundry, respectively, until each union has been certified by the Board in an appropriate unit. A statement of a Field Examiner for the Board, introduced into evidence at the hearing, indicates that the Machinists and the Mold- ers each represents a substantial number of employees in the unit alleged by each to be appropriate 2 We find that questions affecting commerce have arisen concerning the representation of employees of the Company within the meaning of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act. 2 The Field Examiner reported that the Machinists submitted 5 membership applications ; that the names of all persons appearing on the applications were listed on the Company's pay roll of August 23, 1945; and that there were 9 employees in the unit the Machinists alleges to be appropriate . He further reported that the Molders submitted 9 membership applications ; that the names of all persons appearing on the applications were contained in the aforesaid pay roll ; and that there were 10 employees in the unit the Molders alleges to be appropriate. 1348 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD IV. THE APPROPRIATE UNITS The Machinists contends that all machinists, machine shop workers, their helpers and apprentices in the Company's machine shop, exclud- ing foundry employees, clerks, executives, foremen, and all other supervisory employees, constitute an appropriate unit. The Molders, contends that all employees in the Company's foundry, excluding ma- chine shop employees, clerks, executives, foremen, and all other su- pervisory employees, comprise an appropriate unit. The Company, however, urges the establishment of a single unit composed of all of its production and maintenance workers. The Company's plant is divided into two major parts, one engaged in the casting of ferrous and non-ferrous materials and the other in the manufacture of machinery. The casting work is performed in the foundry, which occupies four buildings and part of a fifth. The employees in this department perform work exclusively in connection with the production of castings. The manufacture of machinery is carried on in part of the five other buildings occupied by the Company. There is no interchange of employees between the foundry and the machine shop. The machine shop and foundry are under the ultimate direction of the plant superintendent, but the foundry has its own foreman. Although the Company maintains a single personnel office, it hires foundry workers exclusively for the foundry and only those skilled in machine work for its machine department. The employees in both these departments average about the same rate of pay, but the computation of their earnings is arrived at on different bases. Both unions have confined their organizational activities to those of the Company's employees who traditionally come within their respec- tive crafts. The record discloses no previous history of collective bargaining at the plant. We are of the opinion that the employees in the machine shop and the employees in the foundry constitute sepa- rate appropriate units. We find that the following groups of employees of the Company constitute units appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act: 1. All machinists, machine shop workers, their helpers and appren- tices in the Company's machine shop, excluding foundry employees, clerks, executives, foremen, and all other supervisory employees with authority to hire, promote, discharge, discipline, or otherwise effect changes in the status of employees, or effectively recommend such action ; and 2. All employees in the foundry of the Company, excluding ma- chine shop employees, clerks, executives, foremen, and all other su- pervisory employees with authority to hire, promote, discharge, dis- WATERVILLE IRON WORKS 1349 cipline, or otherwise effect changes in the status of employees , or effec- tively recommend such action. V. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES We shall direct that the questions concerning representation which have arisen be resolved by separate elections by secret ballot among the employees in the appropriate units who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of the Direction of Elections herein, subject to the limitations and additions set forth in the Direction. DIRECTION OF ELECTIONS By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Rela- tions Act, and pursuant to Article III, Section 9, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 3, as amended, it is hereby DIRECTED that, as part of the investigation to ascertain representa- tives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Waterville Iron Works, Waterville, Maine, elections by secret ballot shall be con- ducted as early as possible , but not later than sixty ( 60) days from the date of this Direction , under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the First Region, acting in this matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and subject to Article III, Sections 10 and 11, of said Rules and Regulations , among the em- ployees in the units found appropriate in Section IV, above, who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of this Direction , including employees who did not work during said pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation or temporarily laid off, and including employees in the armed forces of the United States who present themselves in person at the polls , but excluding any who have since quit or been discharged for cause and have not been rehired or reinstated prior to the date of the election (1) to determine whether or not the employees in unit 1, described in Sec- tion IV, above, desire to be represented by International Association of Machinists , AFL, for the purposes of collective bargaining; and (2) to determine whether or not the employees in unit 2, described in Section IV, above, desire to be represented by International Mold- ers and Foundry Workers Union of North America, AIL, for the purposes of collective bargaining. MR. JOHN M. HOUSTON took no part in the consideration of the above Decision and Direction of Elections. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation