V. Paturzo, Bro. & Son, Inc.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsNov 16, 1955114 N.L.R.B. 1161 (N.L.R.B. 1955) Copy Citation V. PATURIO, BRO. & SON; -INC. 11161- that they have supervisory functions. as contended by the Petitioner; are properly in the Unit .4 The Petitioner would exclude and the Employer include Vincent Bonomo; a , truckdriver who is paid $1.19 an hour, drives a pickup truck, and buys'sma11 items like shallots and parsley°at the French market when the Employer is out of them. However, other truck- drivers also do this at tunes, although Bonomo does it "primarily." On this record we conclude that Bonomo's -discretion in buying is not such as to make: him" a managerial employee. We shall include him in the unit as a truckdriver. - , Also, the Petitioner would exclude and the Employer include Ture- gan the truck dispatcher,,who is paid $1.26 an hour. He keeps track o£ t^?e, movements of the various trucks and reports to management when "mechanical difficulties occur. His authority over the truck dr`ive'rs"appears to be routine and he makes no effective recommenda- tions as to her status; hence he is not a supervisor and we shall in- clude him in the unit. The platform truck -maintenance man regularly works 12 to 14 hours a week, on Saturdays and Sundays, repairing equipment. In- asm:ueh as he is a regular, part-time employee, no reason appears to exclude him from the unit as contended by the Petitioner.' Accordingly, we find that all production and maintenance employees of the Employer at its New Orleans; Louisiana, warehouses, including bom'iii.en; repackers,`warehousemen, truckdrivers, the truck dispatcher, inventory, clerks, receiving clerks, refrigeration men, the platform truck maintenance man, and salesmen order-takers but excluding the telephone salesman, the manager of the citrus department, office clerical employees, professional employees, guards, and supervisors as defined in the Act, constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the . [Text of Direction of Election omitted from publication.] 11 In rn. MURDOCK took no, part in the consideration of the above Decision and Direction of Election. 4 See Eagle Iron and Brass Company, 110 NLRi3 747, footnote 2 6 See Dependable Parts, Inc., 112 NLRB 581. P. Paturzo, Bro. & Son, Inc . and Material and Residential Con- struction- Laborers Local Union #912, and Laborers District Council I. H. C. B. & C. L. U. of A., AFL, Petitioner . Case No, 5-1C-1775. November Y6,1955 - DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION Upon a petition duly filed under Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act, a hearing was held before William C. Humphrey, hear- 114 NLRB No. 170, 1162 DECISIONS .OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD ing officer. The hearing officer's rulings made'at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. Upon the entire record in this case, the Board finds : 1. The Employer is engaged in the manufacture and sale of concrete products at a single plant located in Baltimore, Maryland. All of the Employer's sales , valued at $2,488,366.37, during its last fiscal year, were made within the State. Its indirect outflow was negligible. Purchases during the same period are valued at $1,224, 084, including out-of-State purchases. It is uncontested that the Employer's out-of- State purchases, exclusive of cement, amounted to $51,695.99. The Petitioner contends that, in addition to these out-of-State purchases, the Employer also bought cement from out of State in the amount of $627,922.96. ' The Employer, however, would have us dis- miss the petition on the grounds that the cement transactions are intra- state and at most constitute no more than indirect inflow; that the value of this cement for the fiscal year was only $469,829; and that, in any event, last year's inflow was, abnormally large rather than typical. The Employer buys all of its cement from Standard Lime and Cement Company, hereafter called Standard. Arrangements for these purchases are made with salesmen from Standard's principal office in Baltimore where the Employer pays by check and where Standard has a bank account. However, Standard has no manufacturing opera- tions in Maryland. All of its cement is produced at its Martinsburg, West Virginia, plant. It also operates limestone or refractory plants at Millville and Bakerton, West Virginia; Kimballton, Virginia; Pleasant Gap, Pennsylvania; Chicago, Illinois; Manistee, Michigan; and at Woodville, Ohio. Standard directly ships its cement in car- load lots f. o. b. Martinsburg to the Employer in Baltimore. The Employer's bill includes the price of the cement at Martinsburg plus freight charges, a 3-percent transportation tax, and a 15-percent to 18- percent surcharge on freight. In accordance ;with industry practice, the Employer subtracts a 10-cent per barrel discount which, for the last fiscal period, totaled $17,729.40. The Employer also would deduct the freight, the tax, and the surcharge, leaving the Martinsburg price of $469,829 after discount. As the cement is produced in, and shipped from, another State, we find that the cement purchased from Standard constitutes direct out-of-State inflow. We reject the Employer's contention that the procedure of placing its orders through Standard's local Baltimore office renders such cement purchases indirect inflow.' Nor do we find merit in the contention that, because Standard occasionally re- routes, purchases, or repurchases carload lots already on sidings in '.ferry Cravens, Inc., 113 NLRB 875. V. PATURZO, BRO. & SON, INC. 1163 Maryland and directs such cars to the Employer, the amount of the direct inflow should be reduced accordingly. We also reject the Em- ployer's contention that cement purchases for previous years and for 1955 indicate that figures for the last fiscal year were atypical. Fig- ures for previous years showed no substantial variation while figures for 1955 would indicate that cement purchases will be the same or higher.' Likewise without merit is the Employer's contention that taxes, freight, and other costs do not enter into the value of the cement receivedaby the Employer in Baltimore. Although it appears that the Employer takes title to the cement at Martinsburg, the value of the goods received in Baltimore includes transportation and other charges.' We agree that the discount of 10 cents per barrel should not be included. However, the Employer's operations meet the Board's half-million-dollar standard for direct inflow even if the figure of $469,829, urged by the Employer, is used, inasmuch as the Employer adiiits to' additional'direc't'ihflow of'$51,659.99' We therefore find that the Employer is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the Act, and that it will effectuate the purposes of the Act to assert jurisdiction herein. The Employer's motion to dismiss is hereby denied. % 2. The labor organization involved claims to represent certain em- ployees of the Employer. 3. A question affecting commerce exists concerning the representa- tion of employees of the Employer within the meaning of Section 9 (c) (1) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act. 4. The parties agree and we find that the following employees con- stitute a unit appropriate for collective bargaining within the mean- ing of Section 9 (b) of the Act: All production and maintenance employees employed at the Employer's Baltimore, Maryland, plant, including all mixer men, tow-motor operators, machine men, platform- truck operators, yard men, yard and machine men, maintenance men, hand-cas`t' operatovs,,, the, plant-payroll timekeeper and the inventory clerk, the maintenance dispatcher, and the shipping clerk, but exclud- ing the charwoman, all office clerical employees, guards, all salesmen, and all other supervisors as defined in the Act. [Text of Direction of Election omitted from publication.] MEMBER MURDOCK took no part in the consideration of the above Decision and Direction of Election. 2 See Aroostook Federation of Farmers, Inc , i 14 NLRB 538 2 South Florida Liquors Distributors, Inc, 113 NLRB 109. 4 Jonesboro Grain Drying Cooperative, 110 NLRB 481. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation