United Brick and Tile Co.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsNov 25, 194671 N.L.R.B. 763 (N.L.R.B. 1946) Copy Citation In the Matter of UNITED BRICK AND TILE COMPANY. EMPLOYER and INTERNATIONAL UNION OF MINE, MILL AND S _IIELTER WORKERS, CIO, PETITIONER Case No. 18-R-1548.Decided November 25, 19461 Mr. Walter F . Maley, of Des Moines , Iowa, for the Employer. Messrs . Floyd Piper and Hairy Bootle , both of Des Moines, Iowa, for the Petitioner. Mr. Warren Lelavad, of counsel to the Board. DECISION AND CERTIFICATION OF REPRESENTATIVES STATEMENT OF TILE CASE Upon a petition duly filed the National Labor Relations Board, on June 17, 1946, conducted a prehearing election among employees of the Employer in the alleged appropriate unit, to determine whether or not they desired to be represented by the Petitioner for the purposes of collective bargaining. At the close of the election a Tally of Ballots was furnished the parties. The Tally shows that there were approximately 30 eligible voters of whom 26 cast valid ballots, 15 of which were for the Peti- tioner and 11 against. Thereafter, hearing in the case was held at Des Moines, Iowa, on July 17, 1946, before Gerald P. Leicht, hearing officer, and on October 18, 1946, before Clarence A. Meter, hearing officer. At the hearing, and in its brief, the Employer moved that the proceeding be dismissed. For reasons stated in Sections I and V, infra, the motion is hereby denied.' The rulings of the hearing officers made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. Upon the entire record in the case, the National Labor Relations Board makes the following : 'The Emplo3er in its reply brief moved that essentially the whole brief of the Peti- tioner be striken because it contains no matter germane to the issues in this case We find the Employee's contention without sufficient merit and the motion is hereby denied. 71 N L. R. B., No. 130. 763 764 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD FINDINGS OF FACT 1. THE BUSINESS OF THE EMPLOYER United Brick and Tile Company, a Delaware corporation with its principal office at Kansas City, Missouri, is engaged in the manufacture of clay products at plants located in various states in the United States. We are concerned in this proceeding only with the Em- ployer's plant located at Des Moines, Iowa. During the period from January 1, 1946, to September 1. 1946, the Employer purchased raw materials for its Des Moines plant, consisting principally of coal, fire brick, steel, machinery, and electrical equipment, valued in excess of $40,000, approximately 50 percent of which was received from points outside the State of Iowa. During the period from July 1, 1946, to October 18, 1946, the Employer manufactured approximately 1,260,000 bricks at its Des Moines plant. Because of the great local demand for brick, the Employer has not yet shipped its products to points outside the State of Iowa. It is clear, however, that such shipments will be made in due course. Despite the Employer's contention to the contrary, we find that it is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the National Labor Rela- tions Act? If. THE ORGANIZATION INVOLVED The Petitioner is a labor organization affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, claiming to represent employees of the Employer. Iii. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION The Employer refuses to recognize the Petitioner as the exclusive bargaining representative of employees of the Employer until the Petitioner has been certified by the Board in an appropriate emit. We find that a question affecting commerce has arisen concerning - the representation of employees of the Employer, within the meaning of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act. IV. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT We find in accordance with the Petitioner's unopposed request, that all production and maintenance employees employed at the Employer's Des Moines, Iowa, plant, excluding office employees and all supervisory employees with authority to hire, promote, discharge, discipline, or otherwise effect changes in the status of employees, or effectively rec- 2 See Matter of General Motors Corporation, Eastern Aircraft , Linden Division, 44 N L R B 513. UNITED BRICK AND TILE COMPANY 765 ommend such action, constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act. V. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES The Employer urges that the prehearing election was improper and that no certification should issue because it proposes in the near future to increase its complement of employees from about 45, employed at the time of the prehearing election, to approximately 75. Futhermore, the Employer asserts that its present staff of employees is not a rep- resentative group, as it is now comprised of laborers and repairmen, who will eventually be replaced by skilled or semi-skilled production workers. The record reveals that the Employer's Des Moines plant has been closed for approximately 8 years, and repair and construction workers were employed in October 1945 to ready the plant for resumed pro- duction. By June 17, 1946, the date of the prehearing election, ap- proximately 45 unskilled workers were so employed. On July 1, 1946, the Employer commenced production on a small scale, expecting to increase its output progressively, until it would operate a maximum of 13 kilns. On October 18, 1946, there were still approximately 45 work- ers employed, and as many as 10 kilns were in operation. The record shows the Employer hired its present complement of workers as laborers and repairmen with the understanding that, if possible, they would be used for regular production. While the Em- plover would prefer to utilize experienced men for its regular produc- tion work, it is admittedly unable to secure such personnel. Of neces- sity, therefore, the unskilled employees, who have been performing regular production duties, may be retained indefinitely. It is clear that the voting unit in which the election was held cannot be regarded in any way as having been an unrepresentative group. We are also of the opinion that the prehearing election of June 17, 1946, was proper, and we can perceive no va]id reason why a certification should not now issue.3 However, in view of the possible expansion of the appropriate unit to more than twice its size at the tune of the prehearing election 4 we shall entertain a new petition for investigation and certification of representatives affecting the employees involved herein within less than a year, but not before the expiration of 6 months from the date of the certification which we are issuing in the instant proceeding, upon proof As noted above, the Petitioner has received a majority of the valid votes cast we shall therefore, certify the Petitioner as the collective bargaining representative of the employees in the appropriate unit. 4 There were approximately 30 eligibles, and the anticipated increase in the Em- ployer's staff may more than double the number in the appropriate unit at the time of the election. 766 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR REI:ATIONS BOARD (1) that the number of employees in the appropriate unit is more than double the number eligible to vote in the prehearing election of June 17, 1946; and (2) that the petitioning union represents substantial number of employees in the expanded appropriate unit.5 CERTIFICATION OF REPRESENTATIVES IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that International Union of Mine, Mill & Smelter Workers, CIO, has been designated and selected by a majority of all production and maintenance employees employed by United Brick and Tile Company , at its Des Moines , Iowa, plant, excluding office employees , and all supervisory employees with authority to hire, promote, discharge , discipline , or otherwise effect changes in the status of employees , or effectively recommend such action, as their representa- tive for the purposes of collective bargaining , and that pursuant to Section 9 (a) of the Act, the said organization is the exclusive rep- resentative of all such employees for purposes of collective bargaining with respect to rates of pay, wages, hours of employment , and other conditions of employment. 5 See Matter of Aluminum Company of America , 52 N. L R B. 1040. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation