Tracey L. Thompson, Complainant,v.Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Pacific Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionFeb 8, 2012
0120112456 (E.E.O.C. Feb. 8, 2012)

0120112456

02-08-2012

Tracey L. Thompson, Complainant, v. Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Pacific Area), Agency.




Tracey L. Thompson,

Complainant,

v.

Patrick R. Donahoe,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service

(Pacific Area),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120112456

Agency Nos. 4F-940-0207-08 and 4F-940-0075-09

Hearing Nos. 550-2010-00128X and 550-2010-00105X

DISMISSAL OF APPEAL

Complainant filed an appeal with this Commission from the February

18, 2011 Final Decision finding no discrimination with regard to her

complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Section

501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended,

29 U.S.C. § 791 et seq. For the following reasons, Complainant’s

appeal is DISMISSED.

BACKGROUND

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked

as a Part Time Regular Mail Handler at the Agency’s SFC-Napoleon Street

Annex facility in San Francisco, California. Complainant filed formal

complaints alleging that the Agency subjected her to discrimination on

the bases of disability and in reprisal for prior protected EEO activity

under Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 when:

1. Complainant has been forced to perform the work of two men without

any assistance;

2. On or around July 21, 2008, Complainant’s request to fill a vacant

position at a smaller station was denied;

3. Since on or about February 19, 2008, Complainant has been subjected to

harassment in regard to: working conditions and instructions; preferential

treatment of co-workers; held to a higher standard than her peers;

threatened and denied union representation;

4. Complainant was issued a Letter of Warning on May 12, 2009,

for failure to follow instructions; and

5. Complainant was issued a Letter of Warning on September 3,

2009 for irregular attendance.

On April 6, 2011, Complainant filed a civil action (identified as Civil

Action No. C11-01670 EDL) in the United States District Court for the

Northern District of California. The record further discloses that the

claims raised therein encompass those raised in the instant complaint.

The regulation found at 29 C.F.R. § 1614.409 provides that the filing

of a civil action "shall terminate Commission processing of the appeal."

Commission regulations mandate dismissal of the EEO complaint under these

circumstances so as to prevent a Complainant from simultaneously pursuing

both administrative and judicial remedies on the same matters, wasting

resources, and creating the potential for inconsistent or conflicting

decisions, and in order to grant due deference to the authority of the

federal district court. See Stromgren v. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs,

EEOC Request No. 05891079 (May 7, 1990); Sandy v. Dep’t of Justice,

EEOC Appeal No. 01893513 (October 19, 1989); Kotwitz v. U.S. Postal Serv.,

EEOC Request No. 05880114 (October 25, 1988).

CONCLUSION

Complainant’s appeal is DISMISSED. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party’s timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. § 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive

for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency

head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full

name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal

of your case in court. “Agency” or “department” means the

national organization, and not the local office, facility or department

in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a

civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative

processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. §§ 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the

request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits as

stated in the paragraph above (“Right to File a Civil Action”).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

February 8, 2012

__________________

Date

2

0120112456

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

4

0120112456